Hi
We use Snom phones pretty exclusively and find them to be really good.
So long as you get the firmware version up to 7.3.28 you shouldn't have
any issues.
They are really good for remote configuring and management and also have
a really nice web interface for the user to use if the phones
On the 'used' market I can't really fault the Swissvoice 1P10S (The SIP
version). Web Browser/Phone configuration, simple, works flawlessly with
Asterisk, can take a headset and around £10-£20 used.
--
_
-- Bandwidth and
Hi!
On the 'used' market I can't really fault the Swissvoice 1P10S (The
SIP version). Web Browser/Phone configuration, simple, works flawlessly
with Asterisk, can take a headset and around £10-£20 used.
Agreed - but do note that this is a single line phone (correct me if I am
wrong). And
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010, Jeff LaCoursiere wrote:
I haven't used any standard Grandstream IP phones, but I am *trying* to
stabalize the new video phones they have come up with. I have several
GXV3000 and GXV3140s. I got through central provisioning using their java
based tool and for the most
I have always found that the marginal extra cost of a Polycom, Snom or
Cisco phone is very, very well worth it in the long run versus the
giant catastrophe that is Grandstream and other low-budget hardware.
The customers seem to agree.
Budget-conscious doesn't have to mean masochistic.
--
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010, Alex Balashov wrote:
I have always found that the marginal extra cost of a Polycom, Snom or
Cisco phone is very, very well worth it in the long run versus the
giant catastrophe that is Grandstream and other low-budget hardware.
The customers seem to agree.
SPA504G seems to be a good choice since I don't want to have any issues and
this still have the same provisioning scheme I'm working right now.
Also I like the HD feature.. what is the bandwith consumption for that
feature? It will work only between 2 spa504 right? or any G722 device can
Sebastian Milioto wrote:
Hi all,
I have to install 25 IP Phone in some building. I want just basic IP
Phones like:
Cisco-Linksys SPA922 u$s 146
Grandstream GXP-2000 u$s 105
Snom 300 u$s 119
The most valuables parameters for me are (in importance
try Yealink, this is damn good phone and we distribute in India.
Rgards
MT Kondela
www.kevesystems.com
On 2/10/10, Sebastian Milioto smili...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I have to install 25 IP Phone in some building. I want just basic IP Phones
like:
Cisco-Linksys SPA922 u$s 146
Hi all,
I have to install 25 IP Phone in some building. I want just basic IP Phones
like:
Cisco-Linksys SPA922 u$s 146
Grandstream GXP-2000 u$s 105
Snom 300 u$s 119
The most valuables parameters for me are (in importance order from high to
low):
-
Of Sebastian
Milioto
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 9:39 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [asterisk-users] IP Phone recommendation
Hi all,
I have to install 25 IP Phone in some building. I want just basic IP Phones
like:
Cisco-Linksys SPA922 u$s
...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Peder
Sent: 10 February 2010 15:51
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] IP Phone recommendation
Don't use Grandstream if you want quality and stability. Also check out the
Cisco SPA504G. They are the newer
On 10 Feb 2010, at 15:50, Peder wrote:
check out the Cisco SPA504G. They are the newer versions of the
SPA922, support multiple lines and are fairly cheap too.
I second that. They're rock solid, good audio quality and easy to
provision.
S
--
-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Peder
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 10:51 AM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] IP Phone recommendation
Don't use Grandstream if you want quality and stability. Also check out the
Cisco
*Sent:* Wednesday, February 10, 2010 10:51 AM
*To:* 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
*Subject:* Re: [asterisk-users] IP Phone recommendation
Don’t use Grandstream if you want quality and stability. Also check out
the Cisco SPA504G. They are the newer versions
On 10.2.2010 18:06, Steve Howes wrote:
On 10 Feb 2010, at 15:50, Peder wrote:
check out the Cisco SPA504G. They are the newer versions of the
SPA922, support multiple lines and are fairly cheap too.
I second that. They're rock solid, good audio quality and easy to
provision.
S
I see... problem with spa941 is it dont have LAN port (I'm thinking NAT the
customer PC)
Sebastian
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Peter peterp...@aboutsupport.com wrote:
On 10.2.2010 18:06, Steve Howes wrote:
On 10 Feb 2010, at 15:50, Peder wrote:
check out the Cisco SPA504G. They
SPA504G - 1 more vote for it.
It is worth having 4 lines even if you need 1 initially.
SPA504G supports G722 and sound is awesome even if you do not not use
teh HD sound. If you do not care that mcuh about HD sound and do not
need PoE SPA941 is a excellent choice - you get really a lot for the
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Brent Torrenga li...@torrenga.com wrote:
Coming from someone who uses 7940's and 60's: has Cisco/Linksys embraced
SIP compatibility with asterisk more completely with the SPA504G's than they
have the 7940 series? Lack of features on the 7940's is
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Brent Torrenga li...@torrenga.com wrote:
Coming from someone who uses 7940's and 60's: has Cisco/Linksys embraced
SIP compatibility with asterisk more completely with the SPA504G's than
they
have the 7940 series? Lack of features on the 7940's is
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010, Sebastian Milioto wrote:
Hi all,
I have to install 25 IP Phone in some building. I want just basic IP Phones
like:
Cisco-Linksys SPA922 u$s 146
Grandstream GXP-2000 u$s 105
Snom 300 u$s 119
The most valuables parameters for
SPA504G is LINKSYS with newer look and HD :-)
Expect all you had in Linksys SPA9XX + more.
I personaly have both phones - differences are not a lot :)
Peter
On 10.2.2010 20:31, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Brent Torrenga li...@torrenga.com wrote:
Coming from
- Gordon Henderson gordon+aster...@drogon.net wrote:
If not using PoE I'd suggest getting a few extra PSUs though - that's
one
area I have had a few issues with - but maybe it's just been the UK
ones.
Gordon
The same can be said for the US versions. My experience has been it's not a
Hi!
Lack of features on the 7940's is frustrating, and makes me hesitant to
try other Cisco phones, even if the SPA504G is newer.
Here are two quotes that make me stay away from Cisco/Linksys:
Firmware can be downloaded from the Cisco Support Center (registered
partners only - password
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010, Tim Nelson wrote:
- Gordon Henderson gordon+aster...@drogon.net wrote:
If not using PoE I'd suggest getting a few extra PSUs though - that's
one
area I have had a few issues with - but maybe it's just been the UK
ones.
Gordon
The same can be said for the US
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Philipp von Klitzing
klitz...@pool.informatik.rwth-aachen.de wrote:
Here are two quotes that make me stay away from Cisco/Linksys:
Firmware can be downloaded from the Cisco Support Center (registered
partners only - password required) [...]
Here is a
I would love to hear some inputs on Aastra and Snom IP phones.
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Jeff LaCoursiere j...@jeff.net wrote:
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010, Tim Nelson wrote:
- Gordon Henderson
gordon+aster...@drogon.netgordon%2baster...@drogon.net
wrote:
If not using PoE I'd
I would love to hear some inputs on Aastra and Snom IP phones.
I'm using Aastra 57i phones and like them. They can provisioned easily
(without ANY entries from a local network). The support BLF and I'm also
using the XML capability.
--
At 02:18 PM 2/10/2010, you wrote:
I would love to hear some inputs on Aastra and Snom IP phones.
I've have 3 480i-CT Aastra phones in our house for 3 or 4 years now
with no complaints. Took a year for the firmware to get where it is
and there were some things I'd like changed, but I can't
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 09:18:34AM -0500, Danny Nicholas wrote:
I will agree with most of what you say about the polycoms, but here is one
thing to help you out. The Polycom 501 has an HTTP configuration interface;
I set up mine thru http://127.0.0.1:8088/asterisk/static/phones where
Cary Fitch wrote:
We have a bunch of SNOM 360’s we are not using. I agree they are not
intuitive to the user. They work ok in general. I would part with 15
or so at an attractive price, one or more,
I like the Grandstream 2000 series. Easy to use, easy to set up, good
web page.
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Rob Hillis wrote:
Cary Fitch wrote:
We have a bunch of SNOM 360ÿÿs we are not using. I agree they are not
intuitive to the user. They work ok in general. I would part with 15
or so at an attractive price, one or more,
I like the Grandstream 2000 series. Easy to use,
Right! Whatever somebody likes more! I just say that the Snoms look
better at the side of my Mac. Wich is of course by far the superiour
system. ;-)
Chris
John Novack schrieb:
Hasn't this religious argument/discussion gone on long enough??
zoach...@securax.org wrote:
I personally find
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] IP phone recommendation
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 09:18:34AM -0500, Danny Nicholas wrote:
I will agree with most of what you say about the polycoms, but here is one
thing to help you out. The Polycom 501 has an HTTP configuration
interface;
I set up mine thru http
Hi all,
Any good recommendation of IP phone in term of sound quality and
price (reasonable) using with asterisk?
ango
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update
Discussion
Betreff: [asterisk-users] IP phone recommendation
Hi all,
Any good recommendation of IP phone in term of sound quality and
price (reasonable) using with asterisk?
ango
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com
-
Von: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:
asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] Im Auftrag von Rilawich Ango
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. Juni 2009 09:45
An: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Betreff: [asterisk-users] IP phone recommendation
Hi all,
Any good
On 03/06/09 08:37, Rilawich Ango wrote:
Hi all,
Any good recommendation of IP phone in term of sound quality and
price (reasonable) using with asterisk?
ango
Not sure where you are in the world, or what you really need but I like
the Siemens Gigaset IP DECT phones.
The S685IP is really
Christian Stredicke wrote:
Check out the snom 300 or the snom 820...
Good lord... talk about two extremes... :) The Snom 300 is pretty good,
but the 320 is much better and costs around a *third* of what the Snom
820 does.
Stick with the older model snoms. So far I've seen nothing about
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 08:23:13PM +1000, Rob Hillis wrote:
Christian Stredicke wrote:
Check out the snom 300 or the snom 820...
Good lord... talk about two extremes... :) The Snom 300 is pretty good,
but the 320 is much better and costs around a *third* of what the Snom
820 does.
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Rob Hillis wrote:
Christian Stredicke wrote:
Check out the snom 300 or the snom 820...
Good lord... talk about two extremes... :) The Snom 300 is pretty good,
but the 320 is much better and costs around a *third* of what the Snom
820 does.
Stick with the older model
Alex Samad wrote:
I have been looking at a snom 300, which seems okay. the display goes a
bit haywire occasionally - not sure why yet.
Are the 320 worth the extra money ?
IMO yes, though it really depends on what you want from the phone.
The Snom 320s handle transfers considerably better
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Rob Hillis wrote:
Alex Samad wrote:
I have been looking at a snom 300, which seems okay. the display goes a
bit haywire occasionally - not sure why yet.
Are the 320 worth the extra money ?
IMO yes, though it really depends on what you want from the phone.
The Snom
Jeff LaCoursiere wrote:
We are still talking about a $175 phone. How about the Polycom IP 320?
$85 at 888voipstore. Can't go wrong with Polycom for voice quality.
True, Polycom's are brilliant for voice quality, but unlike the Snom, a
Polycom /will/ reboot on the drop of a hat /and/ take
members.
-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Rob Hillis
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 9:10 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] IP phone
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Rob Hillis wrote:
Jeff LaCoursiere wrote:
We are still talking about a $175 phone. How about the Polycom IP 320?
$85 at 888voipstore. Can't go wrong with Polycom for voice quality.
True, Polycom's are brilliant for voice quality, but unlike the Snom, a
Polycom
On 06/03/2009 11:47 AM, Jeff LaCoursiere wrote:
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Rob Hillis wrote:
Jeff LaCoursiere wrote:
We are still talking about a $175 phone. How about the Polycom IP 320?
$85 at 888voipstore. Can't go wrong with Polycom for voice quality.
True, Polycom's are brilliant for voice
I personally find the snom phones to be generally ugly and
un-finger-friendly, in terms of reliability and quality, never had any
trouble, good phones all in all, i just can't get past the tacky look and
feel so don't buy them.
2009/6/3 Darrick Hartman dhart...@djhsolutions.com
On 06/03/2009
market.
Cary Fitch
_
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Geraint Lee
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 12:33 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] IP phone
I'll put in my $0.02CAD for Polycom. We use the 330s here.
Singer
Geraint Lee wrote:
I personally find the snom phones to be generally ugly and
un-finger-friendly, in terms of reliability and quality, never had
any trouble, good phones all in all, i just can't get past the tacky
look and
I personally find the snom phones to look quite good compared to the
american and chinese brands, might be a european thing though :)
Zoa
Geraint Lee wrote:
I personally find the snom phones to be generally ugly and
un-finger-friendly, in terms of reliability and quality, never had
any
Hasn't this religious argument/discussion gone on long enough??
zoach...@securax.org wrote:
I personally find the snom phones to look quite good compared to the
american and chinese brands, might be a european thing though :)
Zoa
Geraint Lee wrote:
I personally find the snom phones
you could say it has, and you're right, it probably has :)
but i personally find these threads help make the day pass a little faster
2009/6/3 John Novack jnov...@stromberg-carlson.org
Hasn't this religious argument/discussion gone on long enough??
zoach...@securax.org wrote:
I personally
How did I miss thins gem?
Polycom /will/ reboot on the drop of a hat /and/ take a damned
long time
to do it (~45-60 seconds) In addition, the web interface should
be
taken away and shot - the only real way to configure them is
through (T)FTP.
I didn't say
Kris,
I highly recommend the snom 320. Very easy to configure, and very easy
to setup line appearances.
As has already been mentioned, the idea of lines is a bit dated.
For more information, read this:
http://forums.digium.com/viewtopic.php?t=891.
Sean
Duracom ISP Lists wrote:
We
Anders Svensson wrote:
We use Grandstream GPX2000 for this. It works ok. Support 11 lines in basic.
Anders
I also use this phone, have read about the 11 lines, but how does one
'manage' these lines? The first 4 are easy, you have buttons for that,
but how can you use the 'others' ?
You can use the speeddial buttons. They are configurable
Anders
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kristof Hardy
Sent: den 13 december 2005 09:17
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] IP
We are going to replace our existing PBX system with an Asterisks box. I
have 7 phone lines that come in and I need to get a phone that would support
that many lines at minimum. Do you guys recommend any phones that you have
used that work well.
Kris
: [Asterisk-Users] IP Phone Recommendation
We are going to replace our existing PBX system with an Asterisks box. I
have 7 phone lines that come in and I need to get a phone that would support
that many lines at minimum. Do you guys recommend any phones that you have
used that work well.
Kris
Often when existing PBXs go and are replaced by IP phones, the
installer/planner doesn't realize that the tern *lines* isn't really
correct -- think *appearances* and it might help you visualize your
needs a little more accurately. How many simultaneous calls must a
phone user be in at once?
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Duracom ISP
Lists
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 2:36 PM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] IP Phone Recommendation
We are going to replace our existing PBX system with an Asterisks box. I
have 7 phone lines
Discussion'
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] IP Phone Recommendation
We are going to replace our existing PBX system with an Asterisks box.
I
have 7 phone lines that come in and I need to get a phone that would
support
that many lines at minimum. Do you guys recommend any phones that you
have
used that work
Have been experimenting with Asterisk for about 2 months now
have developed a configuration that I feel is ready to deploy for our
own in house use
As deployed, we will have an Asterisk server at our main
office with 4 IP and 11 legacy analog extensions on an ancient Panasonic
Gary G. Hendershot wrote:
I have admired the Cisco 7960, the Polycom 600 and the Snom 200 more or
less in that order of appeal all seem to be available in about the
same general price range of $275-$350 street price (used ones for less
on eBay) I am new enough to IP telephony gear that I have
Do you need to use a real VoIP phone at the remote locations,
especially those which will be behind a NAT?
In particular, given that IAX traverses NAT more easily than SIP, I
wonder if you would get better results buying a nice analog desk phone
and an IAXy
PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] IP Phone Recommendation ?
We will also need to deploy 8 additional units at remote locations that
are on consumer type internet connections . mostly cable and DSL but one
is on a satellite ISP (guy lives in the woods but writes beautiful code)
. these remotes
Hi
Out of interest, (this may be not possible) but I think it
would be an excellent idea to modify firmware to handle the
IAX2 protocol. Especially since its a linux based phone.
Thoughts?
Regards
Clive
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 21:54:59 +
Joshua Colp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] IP phone recommendation
Hi
Out of interest, (this may be not possible) but I think it
would be an excellent idea to modify firmware to handle the
IAX2 protocol. Especially since its a linux based phone.
Thoughts?
Regards
Clive
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 21
Hi,
I am looking for some affordable IP Phones. Any experiences with the
SipToneII by ipDialog?
What about soft phones? Any recommendations there (for Windoze and Linux)?
Thanks,
Yiannis
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL
On Mon, 2004-07-19 at 09:04, Yiannis Costopoulos wrote:
Hi,
I am looking for some affordable IP Phones. Any experiences with the
SipToneII by ipDialog?
So far our experience with the IP Dialog SipToneII is not good. It
locks up after hang up on us, and just does not play nice. If
I really wish a few users would help me with my Avaya 4602SW SIP phone
as I believe I am the first to try it with Asterisk. Its a very modern
looking phone, I've seen it on froogle for about $135, and it has a
decent set of features, and Avaya is really good quality and has a
good name in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 19 July 2004 12:04 pm, Yiannis Costopoulos wrote:
Hi,
I am looking for some affordable IP Phones. Any experiences with the
SipToneII by ipDialog?
What about soft phones? Any recommendations there (for Windoze and Linux)?
Hello Yiannis,
I have an ipDialog SipTone II sitting right beside me. Overall it is an
excellent phone but lacks codecs. It only has ulaw, alaw, and g729. The
speakerphone is adequate for most things, call transferring works, holding,
volume controller, conferencing, 2 lines, it pretty much
Hey thanks. Much appreciated!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Andy Hester
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 9:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] IP phone recommendation
Nathan,
I am using
At 08:14 13-8-2003 -0500, you wrote:
Has anyone had the opportunity to use a PingTel phone with Asterisk?
No, I have used the Pingtel softclient though, and it's supposed to be very
similar. Works pretty well, although I seem to remember something about
DTMF modes...
Met vriendelijke groet,
http://voipstore.atacomm.com/shops/Browse.aspx/27934028032-27934031360.htm
Thats a good start..
bkw
On Tue, 12 Aug 2003, Fabrice Tereszkiewicz wrote:
Hello,
I would like to buy a SIP IP phone, but I don't know wich one to
choose... Can you tell me wich IP Phone is known to work with
Hello,
I would like to buy a SIP IP phone, but I don't know wich one to
choose... Can you tell me wich IP Phone is known to work with Asterisk
please.
I've seen the Cisco 7940, but I don't know if it works, and how
expensive is it ?
I'm french, so if you know some french resellers, tell me.
PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 10:12 PM
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] IP phone recommendation
How about when you compare the SNOM to the Budgetone, which one would you
recommend for basic telephony?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
Has anyone had the opportunity to use a PingTel phone with Asterisk?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WipeOut .
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 2:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] IP phone recommendation
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Florian Overkamp
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 8:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] IP phone recommendation
At 08:14 13-8-2003 -0500, you wrote:
Has anyone had the opportunity to use a PingTel phone with Asterisk?
No, I have used
How about when you compare the SNOM to the Budgetone, which one would you
recommend for basic telephony?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of WipeOut .
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 2:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] IP
The Cisco is from what I have heard a good phone but is VERY expenisve..
My suggestions would be to go with either a SNOM 200 or a Grandstream Bugetone..
All these have ben discussed many times in the list so search the archives and read up
on them..
Hello,
I would like to buy a SIP IP
to the Budgetone, which one would you
recommend for basic telephony?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of WipeOut .
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 2:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] IP phone recommendation
I
, 2003 9:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] IP phone recommendation
My users also like the Budgetones better then the Cisco 7960
phones. The
Budgetones just handle echo better. (Cisco really need to get
there echo
problem fixed!)
My only problem
On Tue, 2003-08-12 at 11:45, WipeOut . wrote:
The Cisco is from what I have heard a good phone but is VERY expenisve..
My suggestions would be to go with either a SNOM 200 or a Grandstream Bugetone..
Where can one get a SNOM 200 for less than a Cisco 7960? The Cisco's
are about $300 on eBay
85 matches
Mail list logo
