Re: [asterisk-users] Loss of devices registration (pjsip)

Thanks, George Joseph! Now a lot clearer the reasons for this behavior. It turns out that in the case of devices there are two ways to understand that they are "alive": 1. Registration from device to server 2. qualify from the server to the client And the second way does not seems superfluous.

Re: [asterisk-users] Loss of devices registration (pjsip)

On 21 March 2016 at 20:32, George Joseph wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 11:58 AM, Dmitriy Serov > wrote: > >> Good day. >> >> Asterisk 13.7.2, res_pjsip. >> There is a problem of loss of registration of several devices. This >> happens not

Re: [asterisk-users] Loss of devices registration (pjsip)

Now do you mind if we get back to the original purpose of this thread before it was hijacked? Dmitriy... See my response further back. :) On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 8:42 PM, Pete Mundy wrote: > > Good result! Glad it worked for you :) > > Pete > > > On 22/03/2016, at 9:34

Re: [asterisk-users] Loss of devices registration (pjsip)

Good result! Glad it worked for you :) Pete > On 22/03/2016, at 9:34 am, somsad khan wrote: > > I have added CID name prefix on inbound route. and it works fine :) now I can > simply forward five incoming routes to one extension. and as far as I guess, > if I add

Re: [asterisk-users] Loss of devices registration (pjsip)

Somsad, Yep. That's why I suggested it as another option :) These links may help: http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+Detailed+Variable+List (see CALLERID(num) and CALLERID(name)) http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+cmd+Set Pete > On 22/03/2016, at

Re: [asterisk-users] Loss of devices registration (pjsip)

I have added CID name prefix on inbound route. and it works fine :) now I can simply forward five incoming routes to one extension. and as far as I guess, if I add CID name prefix for every number. it should work :) thanks alot :) On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 2:28 AM, somsad khan

Re: [asterisk-users] Loss of devices registration (pjsip)

On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 11:58 AM, Dmitriy Serov wrote: > Good day. > > Asterisk 13.7.2, res_pjsip. > There is a problem of loss of registration of several devices. This > happens not on all devices, but problem devices a lot. > Below is the log of registration of a contact

Re: [asterisk-users] Loss of devices registration (pjsip)

hello Pete Mundy, thanks alot for your idea and reply. but unfortunately none of our SIP phone have the facilities to use multiple line and UI. I can see incoming numbers on my softphone(Zoiper) when a incoming call hits. I liked your incoming caller ID customize idea. Is it possible to add

Re: [asterisk-users] Loss of devices registration (pjsip)

On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 2:49 PM, somsad khan wrote: > Hello guys, > > I need some help. > > > I have a client coming who wants to assign 5 different numbers to one > virtual employee SIP phone at his desk or softphone (Zoiper). > > > which I can assign for the incoming

Re: [asterisk-users] Loss of devices registration (pjsip)

Many desk phones support multiple simultaneous SIP registrations. You could use BLF buttons for each SIP registration and the operator uses the LEDs as their queue as to which account is ringing. Alternatively the phone's UI may be able to indicate which account is ringing without the need for

Re: [asterisk-users] Loss of devices registration (pjsip)

Hello guys, I need some help. I have a client coming who wants to assign 5 different numbers to one virtual employee SIP phone at his desk or softphone (Zoiper). which I can assign for the incoming or outgoing both. but the problem is which I might not understanding enough, that, e.g.

[asterisk-users] Loss of devices registration (pjsip)

Good day. Asterisk 13.7.2, res_pjsip. There is a problem of loss of registration of several devices. This happens not on all devices, but problem devices a lot. Below is the log of registration of a contact of one device. Is suspect two things: 1. delete a contact after the contact is added.