Re: [asterisk-users] Mixing commercial/SVN Asterisk

2009-12-17 Thread Scott L. Lykens
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Mixing commercial/SVN Asterisk On Dec 16, 2009, at 10:08 AM, Richard Kenner wrote: Am I correct that if I'm running an -rc or from an SVN release tree that there's no way I can use any commercial add-ons from Digium, such as Skype, Cepstral, or G.729

Re: [asterisk-users] Mixing commercial/SVN Asterisk

2009-12-17 Thread Richard Kenner
It is frustrating to me as we are encouraged to upgrade due to security issues but if we want to use this particular Digium product we cannot. I have chosen to upgrade as we have not purchased Fax for Asterisk and as we are unable to evaluate it I doubt we will. (Not to be snarky but I don't

Re: [asterisk-users] Mixing commercial/SVN Asterisk

2009-12-17 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
Scott L. Lykens wrote: I don't mean to be rude in calling you out about it, however, I've been waiting for three months for an appearance of Fax for Asterisk that is compatible with 1.6.1.5+. Several previous requests for timelines to this list have resulted in responses indicating it was

[asterisk-users] Mixing commercial/SVN Asterisk

2009-12-16 Thread Richard Kenner
Am I correct that if I'm running an -rc or from an SVN release tree that there's no way I can use any commercial add-ons from Digium, such as Skype, Cepstral, or G.729? ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

Re: [asterisk-users] Mixing commercial/SVN Asterisk

2009-12-16 Thread John Todd
On Dec 16, 2009, at 10:08 AM, Richard Kenner wrote: Am I correct that if I'm running an -rc or from an SVN release tree that there's no way I can use any commercial add-ons from Digium, such as Skype, Cepstral, or G.729? No, happily not correct. :-) Digium tries to make their add-ons

Re: [asterisk-users] Mixing commercial/SVN Asterisk

2009-12-16 Thread Richard Kenner
Am I correct that if I'm running an -rc or from an SVN release tree that there's no way I can use any commercial add-ons from Digium, such as Skype, Cepstral, or G.729? No, happily not correct. :-) Digium tries to make their add-ons work with all major releases of Asterisk. You

Re: [asterisk-users] Mixing commercial/SVN Asterisk

2009-12-16 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
Richard Kenner wrote: Well, I tried to use res_cepstral.so for 1.6.0 on the 1.6.2 release branch and Asterisk dumped core on startup. I take it that wasn't expected? You should not try to mix modules for different major versions of Asterisk. 1.6.0.x modules should only be used with 1.6.0.x,

Re: [asterisk-users] Mixing commercial/SVN Asterisk

2009-12-16 Thread Richard Kenner
You should not try to mix modules for different major versions of Asterisk. 1.6.0.x modules should only be used with 1.6.0.x, etc. While John's previous comments were not incorrect, it is unfortunately quite common that there are API/ABI changes between major releases that necessitate

Re: [asterisk-users] Mixing commercial/SVN Asterisk

2009-12-16 Thread Danny Nicholas
@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Mixing commercial/SVN Asterisk You should not try to mix modules for different major versions of Asterisk. 1.6.0.x modules should only be used with 1.6.0.x, etc. While John's previous comments were not incorrect, it is unfortunately quite common

Re: [asterisk-users] Mixing commercial/SVN Asterisk

2009-12-16 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
Danny Nicholas wrote: Shouldn't is a better word. Some will work, others won't. Buyer beware. And the subject of the email might imply that this is caused by licensing issues, but it's not... it's just because we don't produce binary modules releases for every possible version of Asterisk that