Hi Philipp -
Since the list was switched over to API-Digital almost
every message I get is older than a week. Coincidence?
Is anyone else having trouble?
Well, this is now the third active thread on this subject, but I guess
you won't see this message for a while. Has anyone dissected the
Dovid B wrote:
2) If you hav been following the list and the issue you will notice
that the problem is for a lot of users that have their servers out
side of the US. The problems started when digium moved over from easy
news to api-digital. The reason why you probably have no issue is
Anthony Francis wrote:
Doug Lytle wrote:
Before poking Digium too much, I would look at exactly what YOUR mail
servers are doing that may potentially be the real cause of the delays.
You have two servers in your MX records.
drdos.info. 60 IN MX 10 smtp.drdos.info.
Philipp Kempgen wrote:
Anthony Francis wrote:
Doug Lytle wrote:
Before poking Digium too much, I would look at exactly what YOUR mail
servers are doing that may potentially be the real cause of the delays.
You have two servers in your MX records.
drdos.info.
-levels: (S:91.99845/99.9 FC:95.5390 LC:95.5390 R:95.9108 P:95.9108
M:97.0282 C:98.6951 )
X-pstn-settings: 3 (1.:1.) s fc lc gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c
X-pstn-addresses: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] [db-null]
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Slow list
X-BeenThere: asterisk-users
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Walt Reed
Sent: Friday, 6 July 2007 6:33 a.m.
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Slow list
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 01:40:50PM -0400, Doug Lytle said:
Well, this is now the third active
Andrew,
1) Please reply a topic on hand. If it is about the slow list then reply to
that thread. It is confusing to people if you reply to a release from the
Asterisk development team.
2) If you hav been following the list and the issue you will notice that the
problem is for a lot of users
Doug Lytle wrote:
Looks like mail is getting held up between INXS.digium.internal and
lists.digium.com
Here's what I get:
---cut---
Received: from lanai.amooma.com ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (lanai.amooma.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id DYhd6TXxmG6B;
On 16:28, Thu 05 Jul 07, Philipp Kempgen wrote:
Since the list was switched over to API-Digital almost
every message I get is older than a week. Coincidence?
Is anyone else having trouble?
Regards,
Philipp
I got this message today July 14
Yes, I have the same.
--
Michiel van Baak
Well, this is now the third active thread on this subject, but I guess
you won't see this message for a while. Has anyone dissected the
headers of a delayed message yet? We should be able to tell for sure
where the holdup is. All of the messages are coming through on time
for me, so it won't do
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 05.07.2007, 14:58 -0400 schrieb Andrew Kohlsmith:
On Thursday 05 July 2007 2:38 pm, Doug Lytle wrote:
Already did that. I use ASSP for filtering. Digium and associated
mailing lists are white listed. There was only 1 attempt for deliver
and there were no delays.
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 11:42:24AM -0400, Noah Miller wrote:
Hi Philipp -
Since the list was switched over to API-Digital almost
every message I get is older than a week. Coincidence?
Is anyone else having trouble?
Well, this is now the third active thread on this subject, but I guess
Doug: are you starting a new message on each new reply?
(quoting from the list archives?)
Yes,
I have no other choice. None of these messages are coming though to my mail
server.
Doug
--
Ben Franklin quote:
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
Since the list was switched over to API-Digital almost
every message I get is older than a week. Coincidence?
Is anyone else having trouble?
Regards,
Philipp
--
amooma GmbH - Bachstr. 126 - 56566 Neuwied - http://www.amooma.de
Let's use IT to solve problems and not to create new ones.
Before poking Digium too much, I would look at exactly what YOUR mail
servers are doing that may potentially be the real cause of the delays.
Already did that. I use ASSP for filtering. Digium and associated
mailing lists are white listed. There was only 1 attempt for deliver
and there
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 01:40:50PM -0400, Doug Lytle said:
Well, this is now the third active thread on this subject, but I guess
you won't see this message for a while. Has anyone dissected the
headers of a delayed message yet? We should be able to tell for sure
where the holdup is. All
On Thursday 05 July 2007 2:38 pm, Doug Lytle wrote:
Already did that. I use ASSP for filtering. Digium and associated
mailing lists are white listed. There was only 1 attempt for deliver
and there were no delays. I subscribe to 10 mailing lists (Including
the dev list) and they are not
Doug Lytle wrote:
Before poking Digium too much, I would look at exactly what YOUR mail
servers are doing that may potentially be the real cause of the delays.
Already did that. I use ASSP for filtering. Digium and associated
mailing lists are white listed. There was only 1
stand s a large probability that the list server is trying that address
first.
We'll test your theory, I don't get anything but spam on my second
server, so I've had it shut down for a good portion of this year. I
just went and started it back up. If this was the case though, I'd
expect the
Philipp Kempgen wrote:
Wow. My message made it to the list after more than 3 hours.
Philipp
I noticed similar delays, no wonder we get a lot of 'me too'-s to the
list (sorry list for my bitching).
--
Remco Post
I didn't write all this code, and I can't even pretend that all of it
Wow. My message made it to the list after more than 3 hours.
Philipp
--
amooma GmbH - Bachstr. 126 - 56566 Neuwied - http://www.amooma.de
Let's use IT to solve problems and not to create new ones.
Asterisk? - http://www.das-asterisk-buch.de
Geschäftsführer: Stefan
21 matches
Mail list logo
