Re: [asterisk-users] Wi-SIP 802.11f - Inter Access Point Protocol HANDOFF

2008-08-31 Thread Duncan Turnbull
Its not so hard if the APs are purely just converting ethernet to wireless. If there is any authing on the AP then it would be tougher. And a centralised DHCP issuer is important i.e. just one address range across all APs so when moving APs there is no dhcp change, no auth change, just a

[asterisk-users] Wi-SIP 802.11f - Inter Access Point Protocol HANDOFF

2008-08-30 Thread Karl Fife
Has anyone ever really, truly, actually held on to a Wi-SIP call while moving from the range of one AP to the range of another AP in the same network? Let's say a 'YES' only counts if you had a bona-fide handoff. In other words, you began in place 'A' (within range of AP#1 but OUTSIDE the

Re: [asterisk-users] Wi-SIP 802.11f - Inter Access Point Protocol HANDOFF

2008-08-30 Thread Michael Graves
On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 11:51:49 -0500, Karl Fife wrote: Has anyone ever really, truly, actually held on to a Wi-SIP call while moving from the range of one AP to the range of another AP in the same network? Let's say a 'YES' only counts if you had a bona-fide handoff. In other words, you began

Re: [asterisk-users] Wi-SIP 802.11f - Inter Access Point Protocol HANDOFF

2008-08-30 Thread Anthony Messina
On Saturday 30 August 2008 11:51:49 am Karl Fife wrote: Let's say a 'YES' only counts if you had a bona-fide handoff.  In other words, you began in place 'A' (within range of AP#1 but OUTSIDE the range of AP#2), AND THEN MOVED to place 'B' (in range of AP#2, but completely outside the range of

Re: [asterisk-users] Wi-SIP 802.11f - Inter Access Point Protocol HANDOFF

2008-08-30 Thread Karl Fife
wouldn't the ap ranges have to have *some* overlap, lest the basic network connection be dropped, whereby dropping the voip call? Indeed you're right. You'd have area covered by AP 'A' only, AP 'B' only and area of AB overlap, Picture a venn diagram:

Re: [asterisk-users] Wi-SIP 802.11f - Inter Access Point Protocol HANDOFF

2008-08-30 Thread Anthony Messina
On Saturday 30 August 2008 01:35:10 pm Karl Fife wrote: Indeed you're right.   You'd have area covered by AP 'A' only, AP 'B' only and area of AB overlap, Picture a venn diagram: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/56/Venn-diagram-AB.png right. it's just your inital description