Re: [asterisk-users] low-level dump for PRI dchan debugging

2007-08-09 Thread Erik Anderson
On 8/6/07, Erik Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been going back and forth with my telco for several days, trying different configurations to get a new PRI to come up. The bchannels are all up and the T1 is not in alarm status. The dchannel refuses to come up however. We've tried ni2,

Re: [asterisk-users] low-level dump for PRI dchan debugging

2007-08-09 Thread Jerry Jones
On Aug 9, 2007, at 9:37 AM, Erik Anderson wrote: On 8/6/07, Erik Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been going back and forth with my telco for several days, trying different configurations to get a new PRI to come up. The bchannels are all up and the T1 is not in alarm status. The

Re: [asterisk-users] low-level dump for PRI dchan debugging

2007-08-07 Thread Andrew Joakimsen
On 8/6/07, Erik Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/6/07, Anthony Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yeah you are sending the SABME's because you think you are the master, they are not replaying with a UA because they think they are the master, you should def be pri_cpe. Tried it...no

Re: [asterisk-users] low-level dump for PRI dchan debugging

2007-08-07 Thread Erik Anderson
On 8/7/07, Andrew Joakimsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In your wanpipe1.conf see if you have TDMV_DCHAN = 0 Nope. I have it set to 24. -erik -- Erik Anderson http://andersonfam.org ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by

[asterisk-users] low-level dump for PRI dchan debugging

2007-08-06 Thread Erik Anderson
I've been going back and forth with my telco for several days, trying different configurations to get a new PRI to come up. The bchannels are all up and the T1 is not in alarm status. The dchannel refuses to come up however. We've tried ni2, qsig, and now dms100 for the switchtype. The telco

Re: [asterisk-users] low-level dump for PRI dchan debugging

2007-08-06 Thread Steve Totaro
Call Sangoma and give them root if you can. They will fix it quickly or at least give you ammunition that it is the telco's issue. Thanks, Steve Erik Anderson wrote: I've been going back and forth with my telco for several days, trying different configurations to get a new PRI to come up.

Re: [asterisk-users] low-level dump for PRI dchan debugging

2007-08-06 Thread Darryl Dunkin
Switchtype: National ISDN -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik Anderson Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007 11:09 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] low-level dump for PRI dchan debugging I've been

Re: [asterisk-users] low-level dump for PRI dchan debugging

2007-08-06 Thread Erik Anderson
On 8/6/07, Steve Totaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Call Sangoma and give them root if you can. They will fix it quickly or at least give you ammunition that it is the telco's issue. Good idea - I just emailed them. Hopefully they'll respond quickly. My normal contact there (Jignesh) is either

Re: [asterisk-users] low-level dump for PRI dchan debugging

2007-08-06 Thread Steve Totaro
Erik Anderson wrote: On 8/6/07, Steve Totaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Call Sangoma and give them root if you can. They will fix it quickly or at least give you ammunition that it is the telco's issue. Good idea - I just emailed them. Hopefully they'll respond quickly. My normal

Re: [asterisk-users] low-level dump for PRI dchan debugging

2007-08-06 Thread Erik Anderson
On 8/6/07, Darryl Dunkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: wanpipemon is the way to do it as far as I know. For starters, what do your zaptel/zapata configs look like? lpdlnx04*CLI pri show span 1 Primary D-channel: 24 Status: Provisioned, Down, Active Switchtype: Nortel DMS100 Type: Network I know

Re: [asterisk-users] low-level dump for PRI dchan debugging

2007-08-06 Thread Darren Nickerson
Erik Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Good idea - I just emailed them. Hopefully they'll respond quickly. My normal contact there (Jignesh) is either out of the office today or at least he forgot to start up MSN this morning, as he's showing offline. Hopefully he's not the only tech support

Re: [asterisk-users] low-level dump for PRI dchan debugging

2007-08-06 Thread Erik Anderson
On 8/6/07, Steve Totaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have done a conference call with the telco guy, myself, and a Sangoma tech at the same time. I was just quite and let them battle it out. It turned out to be a telco issue but the Global Crossing tech wanted to blame me and my equipment.

Re: [asterisk-users] low-level dump for PRI dchan debugging

2007-08-06 Thread Steve Totaro
Darren Nickerson wrote: Erik Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Good idea - I just emailed them. Hopefully they'll respond quickly. My normal contact there (Jignesh) is either out of the office today or at least he forgot to start up MSN this morning, as he's showing offline. Hopefully

Re: [asterisk-users] low-level dump for PRI dchan debugging

2007-08-06 Thread Anthony Francis
Erik Anderson wrote: On 8/6/07, Steve Totaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Call Sangoma and give them root if you can. They will fix it quickly or at least give you ammunition that it is the telco's issue. Good idea - I just emailed them. Hopefully they'll respond quickly. My normal

Re: [asterisk-users] low-level dump for PRI dchan debugging

2007-08-06 Thread Erik Anderson
On 8/6/07, Anthony Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: also in asterisk do: pri intense debug span 1 Then you should see UA's and SABME's, If you don't, your not talking to them. I see plenty of SABMEs, but nothing else: [ 02 01 7f ] Unnumbered frame: SAPI: 00 C/R: 1 EA: 0 TEI: 000

Re: [asterisk-users] low-level dump for PRI dchan debugging

2007-08-06 Thread Darryl Dunkin
- Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] low-level dump for PRI dchan debugging lpdlnx04*CLI pri show span 1 Primary D-channel: 24 Status: Provisioned, Down, Active Switchtype: Nortel DMS100 Type: Network I know it's odd, but the telco instructed me to set my equipment as the network

Re: [asterisk-users] low-level dump for PRI dchan debugging

2007-08-06 Thread Anthony Francis
: Provisioned, Up, Active Switchtype: National ISDN -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik Anderson Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007 11:09 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] low-level dump

Re: [asterisk-users] low-level dump for PRI dchan debugging

2007-08-06 Thread Anthony Francis
Erik Anderson wrote: On 8/6/07, Anthony Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: also in asterisk do: pri intense debug span 1 Then you should see UA's and SABME's, If you don't, your not talking to them. I see plenty of SABMEs, but nothing else: [ 02 01 7f ] Unnumbered

Re: [asterisk-users] low-level dump for PRI dchan debugging

2007-08-06 Thread Erik Anderson
On 8/6/07, Anthony Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You should never be the signaling source, you are always a slave to the provider, go with pri_cpe and see if things go better. That's what I've experienced in the past, but they were adamant about me being the network end. I tried switching

Re: [asterisk-users] low-level dump for PRI dchan debugging

2007-08-06 Thread Erik Anderson
On 8/6/07, Anthony Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yeah you are sending the SABME's because you think you are the master, they are not replaying with a UA because they think they are the master, you should def be pri_cpe. Tried it...no go. There is one other potential cause here, you may