RE: [Asterisk-Users] Inbound call center - reliability \ scalabil ity with queues

2005-05-24 Thread mattf
OK, If you are going to be recording all calls you will need to rethink things a bit. Recording calls limits you to 50-60 consecutive conversations per server before audio distortion starts to occur. You will probably want to think about limiting yourself to 3 T1s per machine. There are many ways

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Inbound call center - reliability \ scalabil ity with queues

2005-05-24 Thread Ilan Rabinovitch
Matt, Are you doing any call recording / monitoring? What percentage? Ilan On 5/23/05, mattf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For an inbound call center with 4 T1s and 30-50 agents on you would do just fine with a single, one-processor machine. We have handled more than this on a single P4 server

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Inbound call center - reliability \ scalabil ity with queues

2005-05-24 Thread mattf
List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Inbound call center - reliability \ scalabil ity with queues Matt, Are you doing any call recording / monitoring? What percentage? Ilan On 5/23/05, mattf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For an inbound call center with 4 T1s and 30-50

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Inbound call center - reliability \ scalabil ity with queues

2005-05-24 Thread mattf
Well, that really changes things then. I'm not really sure what to tell you because we've never done it that way. The ciscos are limited in how you can have them send calls to different servers based upon specific parameters so you will be limited there somewhat. Is there a specific reason you're

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Inbound call center - reliability \ scalabil ity with queues

2005-05-23 Thread mattf
For an inbound call center with 4 T1s and 30-50 agents on you would do just fine with a single, one-processor machine. We have handled more than this on a single P4 server although we use astGUIclient instead of Asterisk queues, but the load is very similar. I would recommend a Sangoma Quad T1