[asterisk-users] Asterisk 15 Beta Released

2017-08-02 Thread Matt Fredrickson
It is with great pleasure I wish to inform you of the first beta release of the new Asterisk 15 branch. It's a very exciting time to be a user of Asterisk! Asterisk 15 is arguably the biggest release of Asterisk that has happened in the last 10 or so years. There has been a lot of work done in the

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 13 on old VMware ESXI 4

2017-08-02 Thread Richard Kenner
> The version is licensed and the customer does not want to invest on new > hardware/software at the moment. If the ESXI version is too old I need > to give them definitive proof that the segfaults are caused by that but > since the old elastix has been running there for years they do not

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 13 on old VMware ESXI 4

2017-08-02 Thread Doug Lytle
>>> On Aug 2, 2017, at 6:45 AM, Richard Kenner ken...@gnat.com wrote: >>> I wouldn't believe it either. I'd be quite surprised if something won't >>> work with any ESXI version. *Perhaps* there's a configuration issue, but >>> I'd be surprised about that too. There are certain versions of the

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 13 on old VMware ESXI 4

2017-08-02 Thread George Joseph
On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 12:53 PM, Carlos Chavez wrote: > I am having a very tough time trying to replace an Elastix 2.X > install running as a virtual machine on ESXI 4. I tried using the Freepbx > 14 ISO that installs CentOS 6 along with Asterisk 13.16 but I keep

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 13 on old VMware ESXI 4

2017-08-02 Thread Richard Kenner
> There are certain versions of the Linux kernel that have no support > under the older version of ESXI. We started having issues under our > ESXI v4 setup with RH Enterprise and vmware's response was, "It's > not supported" "not supported" and "does not work" are not the same thing. ESXI

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 13 on old VMware ESXI 4

2017-08-02 Thread Nathan Anderson
Richard Kenner wrote: > But the question here > was *Asterisk*, not kernels. User-level code has *way* fewer > dependencies. *Precisely*. Unless we're talking DAHDI here (which we're not), Linux & ESXi are red herrings. Carlos Chavez wrote: > I am having a very tough time trying to

[asterisk-users] SIP-Header Pass-Through

2017-08-02 Thread Carsten Bock
Hi, quick question: I need to pass-through some headers from the A-Leg to the B-Leg, which are connected using PJSIP. Currently I do the following: [handler] exten => addheader,1,GotoIf($["${ARG1}" == ""]?3) exten => addheader,2,Set(PJSIP_HEADER(add,Route)=${ARG1}) exten =>

Re: [asterisk-users] SIP-Header Pass-Through

2017-08-02 Thread Joshua Colp
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017, at 10:39 AM, Carsten Bock wrote: > Hi, > > quick question: > I need to pass-through some headers from the A-Leg to the B-Leg, which > are connected using PJSIP. > Currently I do the following: > > [handler] > exten => addheader,1,GotoIf($["${ARG1}" == ""]?3) > exten =>

[asterisk-users] CallerID matching failure, possibly bug.

2017-08-02 Thread Blank Field
Hello everyone. Seems like i've managed to isolate a troubling behaviour on my asterisk. CallerID pattern matching does not work on the first try. Technical info below: asterisk*CLI> core show version Asterisk 14.5.0 built by admin @ asterisk.domain on a x86_64 running Linux on 2017-06-13

Re: [asterisk-users] CallerID matching failure, possibly bug.

2017-08-02 Thread Joshua Colp
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017, at 08:37 AM, Blank Field wrote: > Hello everyone. > > Seems like i've managed to isolate a troubling behaviour on my asterisk. > CallerID pattern matching does not work on the first try. > > Technical info below: > asterisk*CLI> core show version > Asterisk 14.5.0 built by

Re: [asterisk-users] SIP-Header Pass-Through

2017-08-02 Thread John Kiniston
My only suggestion would be you could reduce your line count by replacing your GotoIf statements with ExecIF statements. exten => addheader,1,ExecIf($["x${ARG1}" != "x"]?Set(PJSIP_HEADER(add,Route)=${ARG1})) same => n,ExecIf($["x${ARG2}" != "x"]?Set(PJSIP_HEADER(add,P-Charging-Vector)=${ARG2}))

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 15.0.0-beta1 Now Available

2017-08-02 Thread Ira
Title: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 15.0.0-beta1 Now Available Hello Asterisk, Wednesday, August 2, 2017, 9:20:19 AM, you wrote: > The Asterisk Development Team would like to announce the first beta of Asterisk 15.0.0. > This beta is available for immediate download at >

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 15.0.0-beta1 Now Available

2017-08-02 Thread Joshua Colp
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017, at 02:28 PM, Ira wrote: > Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 15.0.0-beta1 Now AvailableHello Asterisk, > > Wednesday, August 2, 2017, 9:20:19 AM, you wrote: > > > > The Asterisk Development Team would like to announce the first beta > > of Asterisk 15.0.0. This beta is

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 13 on old VMware ESXI 4

2017-08-02 Thread Carlos Chavez
On 2017-08-02 07:08, Nathan Anderson wrote: Richard Kenner wrote: But the question here was *Asterisk*, not kernels. User-level code has *way* fewer dependencies. *Precisely*. Unless we're talking DAHDI here (which we're not), Linux & ESXi are red herrings. Carlos Chavez wrote: I