Luis,
I'm retracting my observation. Trying to reproduce it with the
logs you asked for did show that the ath9k node tried to increase
the tx data rate from time to time and that the signal strength
was very low. I don't quite understand this, but now I do not
think that the RC algorithm is to
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 6:35 AM, Douglass, Woodrow
woodrow.dougl...@qinetiq-na.com wrote:
After installing the
compat-wireless-2.6 package from november 18th, the system locks up
completely after bringing the interface up, instead of just the oops.
Thank you in advance for any help you guys
Luis R. Rodriguez a écrit :
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Benoit Papillault
benoit.papilla...@free.fr wrote:
From: Benoit PAPILLAULT ben...@benoit-laptop.(none)
It has been tested with a 802.11 frame generator and by checking the FCS
field
of each received frame with the value reported
neither on 11s
I'm hacking on it slowly, due to limited time after work.
--- On Thu, 11/19/09, Yongheng Qi jete...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Yongheng Qi jete...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] 802.11n HT for adhoc?
To: Duy Nguyen dnl...@gmail.com
Cc: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
Date:
Luis,
as an addendum to this I am using suse 11.2 on an eeepc.
2.6.32-rc7-wl-1-desktop-W.
When I boot using the original kernel and compile wireless testing it
compiles ok.
However, If I boot to the wireless-testing kernel(r6) then it does not
compile. It complains about a preload file being
COMO CRESTA DESACTIVO ESTA WEA NO ME INTERESA LINUX!!! ME GUSTA
MAC!!!PORFAVOR SI ME PUEDEN AYUDAR Y OJALA LO RESUELVAN!!!SALUDOS Y AYUDENME
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:38:59 +1000
From: b...@netspeed.com.au
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] Kernel config for
