Re: [ATrpms-users] new mythtv packages increased dependencies

2007-08-03 Thread Shad L. Lords
It could also be that the name of the package changed: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# yum list '*myth*' | grep lib libmyth.i386 0.20.1-158.el4 installed libmyth-0.20.1_0.i3860.20.1-161.el4 atrpms libmythavcodec-0.20.1_0.i386

Re: [ATrpms-users] new mythtv packages increased dependencies

2007-08-03 Thread Kim Bisgaard
Axel Thimm wrote: (I noted though that libmyth was not updated). That should not happen, but it seems unrelated to the removal of the mythtv package. Maybe you have selective/partial upgrading setup? Not w.r.t. myth. Here is the details as of now: # yum list libmyth Loading

Re: [ATrpms-users] new mythtv packages increased dependencies

2007-08-03 Thread Axel Thimm
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 12:48:53AM -0400, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: Axel Thimm wrote: On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 08:39:39AM -0600, Shad L. Lords wrote: [...] but before the update, mythtv wasn't a meta package, it included the /usr/share/doc part mythtv. And it was a required package for at

Re: [ATrpms-users] new mythtv packages increased dependencies

2007-08-03 Thread Kim Bisgaard
Axel Thimm wrote: rpm -e --nodeps libmyth smart upgrade --update Why is it the libmyth package, and not the mythtv package, one should remove? I thought that it was the mythtv package name that was reused. I have been using/advocating the following work around, with no visible

Re: [ATrpms-users] new mythtv packages increased dependencies

2007-08-03 Thread Axel Thimm
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 12:33:22PM +0200, Kim Bisgaard wrote: Try w/o excluding packages ... So you mean this is harmful? exclude=clam* spamassassin It shouldn't, but I never use any excluding in yum (actually almost never use yum proper anyway), so it's best to check w/o (which you did

Re: [ATrpms-users] Tux on ice

2007-08-03 Thread Tako Schotanus
On 8/3/07, Axel Thimm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 09:20:03PM +0200, Tako Schotanus wrote: Just out of curiosity, why the name change to tux on ice? That's an upstream change, not a package level change. I also don't know why, but I assume it's to differentiate from

Re: [ATrpms-users] new mythtv packages increased dependencies

2007-08-03 Thread Axel Thimm
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 09:24:09PM +0200, Kim Bisgaard wrote: # yum list libmyth\* Available Packages libmyth.i386 0.20.1-158.fc7 atrpms libmyth-devel.i386 0.20.1-158.fc7 atrpms Definitely ancient mirror. # cat