Re: [ATrpms-users] nvidia-graphics7185-1.0_7185-74.3.fc7 should have .so instead of .o?

2007-09-10 Thread David O'Shea
- From: David O'Shea [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Paulo Cavalcanti [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: atrpms-users@atrpms.net Sent: Friday, September 07, 2007 7:18 PM Subject: Re: [ATrpms-users] nvidia-graphics7185-1.0_7185-74.3.fc7 should have .so instead of .o? Hi Paulo, I'm trying to use http

[ATrpms-users] nvidia-graphics7185-1.0_7185-74.3.fc7 should have .so instead of .o?

2007-09-06 Thread David O'Shea
Hi, I'm trying to use http://dl.atrpms.net/all/nvidia-graphics7185-1.0_7185-74.3.fc7.i386.rpm on Fedora 7 with a RIVA TNT2 M64. When Xorg starts up, it reports 'Failed to load module nvidia (module does not exist, 0)'. This RPM contains nvidia-1.0-7185_drv.o and a symlink from nvidia_drv.o