For those interested in upgrading to fedora 22, I built the basic packages,
and
they are available here:
http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/myrpms-f22-x86_64/repoview/
Anything missing should be downloaded from rpmfusion, because, in this
case, the package is simple enough, to even bother building
If I remember well, it is a python script.
It is not really difficult to rewrite ...
The problem is that I am using intel graphics 4000, and several apple
computers, and gave up nvidia.
For day to day work it is more than enough for me.
I only have one 8500 card at work. Therefore, it is
Would you have this version already packaged and available somewhere, or at
least, the source rpm?
Thanks.
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 10:33 PM, Stephen Collier judi...@bigpond.net.au
wrote:
On 5/01/2015 6:52 pm, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
Hi,
I need a set of nvidia rpms for an old rhel6 dell
Hi,
I need a set of nvidia rpms for an old rhel6 dell notebook with a nvidia
8400.
Since I upgrades to rhel 6.6, the ones I used stopped to work.
Does anyone know what is the appropriate version now?
Also, I have a new le novo notebook running f21. Anyone has experience with
bumblebee and
The easiest way is rebuilding mplayer against the newer lib:
http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/myrpms-f20-x86_64/lcgrpms/mplayer-1.2-93_snap20140413.fc20.x86_64.rpm
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 6:53 PM, Nick Campbell westlandn...@gmail.com
wrote:
yes, this is what is hanging up. Its trying to install
There are some packages unsigned in Epel, and a lot of broken dependencies
...
You can just install then using in mock, even without signature, and
rebuild your packages.
I have rebuilt quite some packages myself, but I gave up myth a long time
ago... I use xbmc...
My packages are here:
There are so many packages missing on all rhel7 repos,
that I really do not know if the effort is worth ...
Anyway, my basic survival environment is here:
http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/myrpms-el7-x86_64/repoview/
Epel has been extensively used in my builds ...
Some packages from F20 have also
I put the missing packages from ATrpms, here:
http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/myrpms-f20-x86_64/lcgrpms/
Have fun ...
--
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
LCG - UFRJ
___
atrpms-users mailing list
atrpms-users@atrpms.net
I put the latest nvidia kmdl here:
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/rpms/rmps20-x86_64/
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 8:37 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com wrote:
I think Axel, is on vacations, and F20 is missing the majority of its
multimedia packages. Maybe next week we have
Hi,
this is the one I am using now:
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/rpms/rmps20-x86_64/nvidia-graphics331.20-kmdl-3.12.5-302.fc20-331.20-162.fc20.x86_64.rpm
It is working just fine for me.
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 7:40 AM, OM Ugarcina mo.uc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Guys,
Would it
I think Axel, is on vacations, and F20 is missing the majority of its
multimedia packages. Maybe next week we have the packages available ...
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 8:28 AM, OM Ugarcina mo.uc...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02/01/14 21:02, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
Hi,
this is the one I am using now
I had some fun upgrading from F17 to F18...
One of the problems was that nvidia 319 does not compile any more with the
latest 3.10 kernel. Axel compiled the newest nvidia 325.15, which works,
despite of a message complaining about a missing libGL during installation.
There seems to be some
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/nvidia-graphics319.32-319.32-157.fc17.src.rpm
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 8:45 AM, OM Ugarcina mo.uc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Paulo,
Looks like we have a new NVIDIA driver out . Seems to have some new
features , would like to try it out . Can you
in
the atrpms repo so 'yum install mplayer' can work. I'm particularly
interested on the el6 repo.
I glanced around orion.lcg but couldn't find the src.rpm. Hope it's not
lost!
Thanks,
Chris
On 05/22/2013 09:31 AM, OM Ugarcina wrote:
On 22/05/13 23:11, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
I still
I tried and vdpau did not change for me.
Something is not being initialized, because if I try several
times then suddenly it works (maybe one in five tries).
I have two monitors, and I do not know if this fact has anything to do
with the problem. The 310 series worked much better for me ...
On
vdpau is crashing in nvidia 319.17 drivers when playing most divx
compressed avi's.
I am using vo=gl with mplayer to bypass this problem. I do not remember of
seeing
this happen with previous nvidia drivers, thought. My card is a GT 640,
that is,
a relatively new card.
We have to wait for a fix
I still have it here:
http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/myrpms-f12-x86_64/atrpms/mplayer-skins-1.0-16.noarch.rpm
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 9:47 AM, OM Ugarcina mo.uc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Guys,
I have been trying to install mplayer , but am getting a strange
dependency :
Error: Package:
]
/root/redhat/BUILDROOT/nvidia-graphics319.17-319.17-155.el6.x86_64
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/bin/nvidia-cuda-mps-control
/usr/bin/nvidia-cuda-mps-server
/usr/bin/nvidia-persistenced
RPM build errors:
Installed (but
This is easy. There are three new files
not listed in the package yet.
I will try to fix the spec ...
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 9:09 AM, OM Ugarcina mo.uc...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/05/13 23:20, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
This is a renaming Axel created for avoiding conflicts with previous
This is a renaming Axel created for avoiding conflicts with previous
versions
(the files were originally un-versioned).
Maybe nvidia fixed this issue and the renaming is no longer necessary.
Try commenting these two lines and see what happens...
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 8:41 AM, OM Ugarcina
It is a linking problem. It is not finding
the opengl libraries.
I compile using mock, and this avoids conflicts
between mesa and nvidia files.
I have vlc for rhel6 here:
http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/myrpms-el6-x86_64/lcgrpms/vlc-2.0.6-6.el6.x86_64.rpm
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/nvidia-graphics319.17-319.17-155.fc17.src.rpm
On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 4:20 AM, OM Ugarcina mo.uc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Paulo,
Looks like we have a new NVIDIA driver out . Seems to have some new
features , would like to try it out . Can you
Not tested yet:
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/nvidia-graphics310.44-310.44-155.fc17.src.rpm
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 2:04 AM, OM Ugarcina mo.uc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Paulo,
When you can please make us one of your world famous src rpm for the new
Nvidia long lived drivers
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 7:42 AM, OM Ugarcina mo.uc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Paulo,
When time permits could you please package up a srpm for this new nvidia
long lived release . Much appreciate your help .
Not tested, but should work ...
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 9:52 AM, John Pilkington j.p...@tesco.net wrote:
After running Myth 0.26 for a few weeks on my SL6 laptop I thought I would
like to experiment with patches and have tried rebuilding using Stephen's
specfile (posted 2 December) and a new git download. That worked fine,
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 12:04 PM, John Pilkington j.p...@tesco.net wrote:
I saw new packages for nvidia-graphics 304.51-149 and 304.64-150 for
kernel 3.6.10-2, which is in Fedora-testing, and gave them a try. I had
304.51 running under 3.6.2-1, but had a file conflict and had to remove it
to
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 8:42 AM, OM Ugarcina mo.uc...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/12/12 19:39, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 11:08 PM, George Galt george.g...@gmail.commailto:
george.g...@gmail.com** wrote:
Paulo:
I get a conflict with:
Transaction Check Error
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 11:08 PM, George Galt george.g...@gmail.com wrote:
Paulo:
I get a conflict with:
Transaction Check Error:
file /usr/bin/nvidia-cuda-proxy-control from install of
nvidia-graphics310.19-310.19-151.fc16.x86_64 conflicts with file from
package
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 6:15 PM, George Galt george.g...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, I've tried to follow the instructions on the Packaging Guidelines,
but it doesn't seem to have worked for me. I'm reasonable new to RPM
packaging, so I might be missing something.
I've added
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 7:44 PM, George Galt george.g...@gmail.com wrote:
Really? I must have messed up building the src.rpm from the .spec file.
Oh, well. I'm just glad something worked. Please upload the src.rpm and
I'll build it too.
Thanks!!
I am re-uploading it now (same version,
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 8:14 PM, George Galt george.g...@gmail.com wrote:
Ouch! Thanks. I'll wait and give it a try a little later.
It is already there now...
--
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
DCC - UFRJ
___
atrpms-users mailing list
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 2:45 PM, George Galt george.g...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 5:24 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 2:13 AM, OM Ugarcina mo.uc...@gmail.com wrote:
In each case, the path differs by the addition of
nvidia-graphics
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 2:13 AM, OM Ugarcina mo.uc...@gmail.com wrote:
In each case, the path differs by the addition of
nvidia-graphics-310.14 before the file being looked for. Does anyone
have any idea how to either adjust the spec file or alter the way it looks
for these files?
One thing I was going to ask you . I am interested how do you create the
srpm from the binary package that Nvidia makes . I would like to have a go
at making the new 304.60 drivers into a srpm , and then into a set of rpms
for el6 . Any information appreciated greatly .
Basically, you have
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Paulo Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com wrote:
One thing I was going to ask you . I am interested how do you create the
srpm from the binary package that Nvidia makes . I would like to have a go
at making the new 304.60 drivers into a srpm , and then into a set
Sorry, I meant:
rpmbuild -bs --rmsource nvidia-graphics304.51.spec
Furthermore, one has to adapt the spec file to adjust
the version. Axel also names the spec file using the version of the
driver.
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/nvidia-graphics304.60-304.60-149.fc12.src.rpm
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 10:48 PM, OM Ugarcina mo.uc...@gmail.com wrote:
The old nvidia packages do not build for kernel 3.6.1 (F17) any more.
I built the latest 304:
http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/**myrpms-f17-x86_64/nvidia/**
%pre backend
# Add the mythtv user
/usr/sbin/useradd -c mythtvbackend User \
-s /sbin/nologin -r -d %{_varlibdir}/mythtv mythtv 2 /dev/null || :
%post backend
/sbin/chkconfig --add mythbackend
%preun backend
if [ $1 = 0 ]; then
/sbin/service mythbackend stop /dev/null 21
Hi,
has anyone successfully configured mythtv 0.25.2 on F17?
The installation went fine, but ...
My problems are:
1) Mythweb just shows me a blank page. I see some error 500 in http log.
27.0.0.1 - - [27/Aug/2012:09:22:06 -0300] GET /mythweb/ HTTP/1.1 401 401
- Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 12:47 AM, Kirk Bocek t...@kbocek.com wrote:
On 8/25/2012 8:28 AM, James B. Huber wrote:
Can't speak to anyone else, I use the atrpms kernel modules for 0.8.7-88
on both my RHEL and CentOS machines that have both the IR from Hauppauge
IR hardware remotes and a MCE
Paulo:
Thanks for all of the help! You are correct that KDE was the culprit.
Building under Gnome (Cinnamon, to be precise), it worked just fine.
I also experimented with upgrading back to fakeroot 1.12, but found
that didn't work.
I'm curious about these 2 issues. I notice that fakeroot
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 11:08 PM, George Galt george.g...@gmail.com wrote:
Paulo:
Yes, I've checked and I have fakeroot 1.12. What is the difference
and is there any way to use 1.12?
None that I am aware of.
I always downgrade to 1.11. I should have
a pre-build version if you want.
--
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 11:58 AM, George Galt george.g...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks, I've grabbed the src.rpm from Axel's site (here:
http://dl.atrpms.net/all/fakeroot-1.11-19.src.rpm) and built it
myself, but I am still getting an error that says: ERROR: No NVIDIA
driver is currently
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 12:41 PM, George Galt george.g...@gmail.com wrote:
Paulo:
Thanks. I added 0 1 to the end and got a little further, but I've had
a bunch of other issues. I had to create a directory /etc/OpenCL and
chmod 777, but I still get a bunch of errors. It seems like it is
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 3:07 PM, George Galt george.g...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Paulo Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 12:41 PM, George Galt george.g...@gmail.com
wrote:
Paulo:
Thanks. I added 0 1 to the end and got a little
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 9:02 AM, James B. Huber jbhu...@judahnet.netwrote:
Did we stop building/providing updated kernel modules for EL6 ?
Been a few weeks and haven't seen kqemu, lirc or video4linux for last
2.6.32.279.2.1 kernel ???
Regards,
Jim
Our rhel6 license has expired some
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Bob Lightfoot boblf...@gmail.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm trying to build an rpm from an atrpms src.rpm and it keeps failing
for
error: line 13: Dependency tokens must begin with alpha-numeric, '_'
or '/': BuildRequires:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 5:51 PM, Bob Lightfoot boblf...@gmail.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This may have been discussed in the past so pardon the repeat if it
has. I know Axel is a wonderful one man show and will eventually have
time to build and release the
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, SRPM is ready!
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/34775202/mythtv/mythtv-0.25.2-1.fc16.src.rpm
Richard
Actually, I think I can build the Atrpms package,
but I am just finishing my F17 tweaks on my new computer, and had to
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 8:57 AM, John Pilkington j.p...@tesco.net wrote:
On 01/07/12 23:26, Scott Harris wrote:
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 2:15 PM, John Pilkington j.p...@tesco.net
mailto:j.p...@tesco.net wrote:
I've mentioned this in the 'ATrpms Status Update' thread and on the
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 4:59 PM, John Pilkington j.p...@tesco.net wrote:
On 26/06/12 20:32, George Galt wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 3:21 PM, George Galt george.g...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Paulo Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 12
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 9:03 AM, John Pilkington j.p...@tesco.net wrote:
On 27/06/12 12:30, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 4:59 PM, John Pilkington j.p...@tesco.net
mailto:j.p...@tesco.net wrote:
snip
It might be easier to look at the repo:
http
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Bob Lightfoot boblf...@gmail.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paulo - when you say building them is easy are you refering to using
yum to download the source rpm and then rebuild the rpm on the new
kernel running in runlevel 3 mode
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 10:47 PM, Bob Lightfoot boblf...@gmail.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear Atrpms:
This may be a basic newb question but here goes. I use several
kdml packages from atrpms on my mythtv pc and every time a new kernel
is released I end up
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 4:44 AM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote:
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 12:07:03PM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
These new nvidia drivers should always go to testing,
because they cause a lot of headaches ...
I got fooled by them being tagged as long lived ones
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Matt Lewandowsky m...@greenviolet.netwrote:
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 09:48:17 -0400 From: george.g...@gmail.com
Are these instructions for a particular architecture? I'm on Fedora
16 and Fedora 15 at home and these issues were resolved weeks ago. If
you
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote:
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 08:44:31PM +0100, Tom G. Christensen wrote:
On 03/11/2012 04:28 PM, Axel Thimm wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 08:32:35AM -0500, Ed Hurst wrote:
Recent updates won't go through because
The problem is that the new ffmpeg packages were linked against
libvpx 1.0 from testing.
Probably, Axel will rebuild them ...
--
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
LCG - UFRJ
___
atrpms-users mailing list
atrpms-users@atrpms.net
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 8:22 AM, John Pilkington j.p...@tesco.net wrote:
I upgraded a few packages this morning, including the new
nvidia-long-lived and IIRC some ssh-related ones, but not the new
F15-64-bit kernel, and rebooted. Now vlc segfaults when asked to play a
file; I haven't seen
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Bob Tennent rdtenn...@gmail.com wrote:
|Most probaby the relevant files are under ~/.config, ~/.local and
|~/.cache. Paulos suggestion is very good, creating a new user with a
|default config takes only half a minute, so testing whether the issue
|is in
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote:
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 08:43:39AM -0500, Bob Tennent wrote:
| Has anybody else had this problem on EL6 systems? It started in
| vlc-1.1.12-73 and is still there in vlc-1.1.13-74. The preceding
| version,
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 6:49 PM, John Pilkington j.p...@tesco.net wrote:
On 12/18/2011 01:24 PM, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 5:18 PM, John Pilkington j.p...@tesco.net
mailto:j.p...@tesco.net wrote:
On 12/14/2011 06:18 PM, John Robinson wrote:
On 14/12/2011
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 12:27 PM, John Pilkington j.p...@tesco.net wrote:
On 02/12/11 22:21, David Watkins wrote:
http://git.linuxtv.org/media_**build.githttp://git.linuxtv.org/media_build.git
I just ran this and apparently have 473 modules built. Interesting.
That's
on f14, 64bit. Need
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Bob Lightfoot boblf...@gmail.com wrote:
I just did a fresh install of Centos 6 and after yum update and adding
the atrpms I decided to switch from nouveau to the nvidia-graphics driver.
Problem 1 - atrpms had no package for 2.6.32-71.29.1 kernel it wanted
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 12:06:14PM +1100, OM Ugarcina wrote:
I would like to ask for a favour please . Myself and probably many
others have migrated over to RHEL / Centos /SL to escape the fedora
rat race ,
My card is a nvidia gt 240.
vdpau wotks, but not gl.
I am sticking with 285 because of that ...
--
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
LCG - UFRJ
___
atrpms-users mailing list
atrpms-users@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 6:13 PM, Mark Goldberg marklgoldb...@gmail.comwrote:
It seems these are not built, but the video4linux-kmdl-2.6.18-274.7.1.el5
and
video4linux-kmdl-2.6.18-274.7.1.el5PAE are built. Could you build the
Alsa kmdls for kernel 2.6.18-274.7.1.el5 if possible?
There is a
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 6:26 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 12:10 AM, James Szinger jszin...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to run mpd from atrppms on CentOS 6.0. When I first ran it,
I got a segfault in /usr/lib64/libavformat.so.52. I then did
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 12:10 AM, James Szinger jszin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to run mpd from atrppms on CentOS 6.0. When I first ran it,
I got a segfault in /usr/lib64/libavformat.so.52. I then did a 'yum
downgrade libavformat52' from 0.7.1-46.el6 to 0.6.3-43.el6 and now it
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 10:42 AM, George Galt george.g...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Paulo Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 5:14 PM, George Galt george.g...@gmail.com
wrote:
Axel:
There seems to be a conflict between your libva1
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 7:10 PM, The Walters sbwalters0...@gmail.comwrote:
It was the nvidia.conf.backup file. For some reason that was being read
(kept getting the boot warnings about it). Once I removed that and left the
nvidia.conf only it came up fine. Thanks for your help, looking at
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 7:41 PM, Christopher X. Candreva
ch...@westnet.comwrote:
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 7:10 PM, The Walters sbwalters0...@gmail.com
wrote:
It was the nvidia.conf.backup file. For some reason that was
being read
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Marco Scano scagn...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have installed VLC 1.1.10 by repository. When I type the comman vlc -vvv
I obtained the following error
*main interface error: option qt-volume-complete does not exist
[0x9be776c] skins2 interface debug: cannot
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 6:40 AM, John Robinson
john.robin...@anonymous.org.uk wrote:
I just know there must be something in the repo that will convert my tree
of FLACs to a tree of MP3s and retain the tagging and perhaps even artwork
but I'm scoobied[1] if I know what it is. Please could
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 5:54 AM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote:
On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 22:59 -0400, James B. Huber wrote:
Getting a compliant when trying to load the lirc_i2c module on RHEL-6.1
Executing modprobe lirc_i2c as root.
FATAL: Error inserting lirc_i2c
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 5:28 AM, John Pilkington j.p...@tesco.net wrote:
On 10/06/11 00:55, Larry Roberts wrote:
I just upgraded to the latest and greatest mythtv (and all the other
bits) and all is well except I can no longer record programs. A little
digging reveals that it is most likely
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 11:15 PM, mladen kr mlade...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm getting dependency error when trying to install
audacious-plugins-2.4.4-3.el6.x86_64
Error: Package: audacious-plugins-2.4.4-3.el6.x86_64 (atrpms-testing)
Requires: libavcore.so.0()(64bit)
Error:
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote:
On Mon, 2011-05-02 at 15:54 -0400, Speice, Bradlee wrote:
I'm having some problems packaging the nVidia source rpm as given by
atrpms. Specifically, when I try to install the package it complains
that I don't have
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 4:12 AM, Marcel Telka mar...@telka.sk wrote:
Hi,
After update of the lirc packages (to version 0.8.7) on my CentOS 5.5
frontend the MythTV stopped to accept my remotes. I noticed the irw works
correctly, so I assume the lirc API (in liblirc_client.so) somehow
changed
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 7:01 AM, Marcel Telka mar...@telka.sk wrote:
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 05:50:42AM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 4:12 AM, Marcel Telka mar...@telka.sk wrote:
Hi,
After update of the lirc packages (to version 0.8.7) on my CentOS 5.5
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 2:25 AM, Kevin J. Cummings
cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net wrote:
The new, just released, directfb-1.4.11-3.fc14 in Fedora fails to
install because both mplayer-1.0-80_snap20110221.fc14.x86_64 and
xine-lib-1.1.19-22.fc14.x86_64 have an = dependency on
libdirectfb-1.4.so.0
also occurring on F13
eg
- Running transaction check
--- Package libva.i686 0:1.0.10-1.fc13 set to be updated
-- Processing Dependency: libva-x11.so.1 for package:
libva-1.0.10-1.fc13.i686
-- Running transaction check
--- Package libva-x11_1.i686 0:1.0.10-1.fc13 set to be installed
--
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 12:22 AM, Kevin J. Cummings
cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net wrote:
On 03/12/2011 03:27 PM, Brian Long wrote:
Kevin,
It's very iffy mixing RPMs from rpmfusion and ATrpms. As Paulo said,
you should choose which of the above you want and remove the other.
Also, I don't
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 12:02 PM, John Welch jrw3...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 11:54 AM, John Welch jrw3...@gmail.com wrote:
Just tried doing a 'yum update' on one of my Fedora 14 workstations
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 11:54 AM, John Welch jrw3...@gmail.com wrote:
Just tried doing a 'yum update' on one of my Fedora 14 workstations
and got the following message:
'Processing Conflict: libva-1.0.10-1.fc14.i686 conflicts libdrm 2.4.23'
As a test I tried running 'yum remove libdrm' to
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Kevin J. Cummings
cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net wrote:
On 03/11/2011 09:59 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
It needs a newer libdrm (2.4.24), which did not land in the repo yet...
I can't find the updated libdrm, even in updates-testing. Why would
Axel release
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 12:18 AM, Kevin J. Cummings
cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net wrote:
On 03/11/2011 09:25 PM, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
I am having a similar, but different conflict with the new
gnome-mplayer-1.0.2 package having conflicts with the older
gnome-mplayer-common
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky atr...@kosowsky.orgwrote:
After an rpm upgraded, I have the following versions of libva all
installed:
libva-0.31.1.1_1-0.31.1-2_sds5.fc12.i686.rpm
libva-0.32.0-3_sds1.fc12.i686.rpm
libva-0.32.0.1_1-0.32.0-3_sds1.fc12.i686.rpm
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 7:41 PM, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky atr...@kosowsky.orgwrote:
Paulo Cavalcanti wrote at about 18:40:33 -0300 on Wednesday, March 9, 2011:
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky
atr...@kosowsky.orgwrote:
After an rpm upgraded, I have the following versions
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Tony Seward anthony.sew...@ieee.org wrote:
I'm trying to install MythTV from atrpms on a newly installed Scientific
Linux 6.0 machine. Initially there was a missing dependency on
perl-Date-Manip that I resolved by temporarily enabling atrpms-testing
and
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Blammo blammo@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Paulo Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.comwrote:
The previous version of libva has been removed from the repo
and ffmpeg has not been recompiled.
Any ETA on a fix?
libva 0.31 is back, isn't
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Blammo blammo@gmail.com wrote:
Preparing to migrate my mythbackend from Centos5 x64 to F14 x64, so I'm
doing a dry-run on a spare HD. After update upgrade, and installing the
atrpms repo, I do yum install mythtv-backend.. ends up failing with:
--
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 5:45 AM, Neil Bird n...@fnxweb.com wrote:
I'm posting here as the previous mentions of this problem have been here
and not the MythTV list.
I recently got bitten [again¹] by the CentOS 5 module-init-tools update
issue which prevents certain v4l modules from loading
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 5:37 AM, Tom G. Christensen ml...@jupiterrise.comwrote:
Hi,
I was trying to install gstreamer-plugins-ugly but it fails to
install due to a missing dependency.
# yum install gstreamer-plugins-ugly
Loaded plugins: priorities, refresh-packagekit, rhnplugin
496
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 1:09 AM, OM Ugarcina mo.uc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Axel and Guys,
I tried running latest vlc-1.1.6-65.fc14.i686 and it segfaults every time I
try to play back a file with 'Hardware decoding' enabled (which uses VDPAU)
. The nvidia drivers are
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 10:03 PM, Kirk Bocek t...@kbocek.com wrote:
On 1/17/2011 12:33 AM, Axel Thimm wrote:
On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 09:26 -0500, DISAFAN wrote:
If the current GIT version of nuvexport has been reworked, maybe we
should ask if we can have the RPM updated to the reworked
Hi,
the latest kernel-2.6.18-238
broke all video4linux versions.
I managed to compile (not tested yet) removing the cx88 patch
and replacing all tests LINUX_VERSION_CODE KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,20)
for LINUX_VERSION_CODE KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,18).
This is for video4linux-20090907-91.el5.src.rpm
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Paulo Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
the latest kernel-2.6.18-238
broke all video4linux versions.
I managed to compile (not tested yet) removing the cx88 patch
and replacing all tests LINUX_VERSION_CODE KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,20
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Chris Schanzle schan...@nist.gov wrote:
Hi,
Firefox and seamonkey crash on CentOS 5.5 (we use x86_64, haven't tried
i386) when they encounter non-flash video files, e.g.,
http://www.nist.gov/itl/math/hpcvg/upload/vaneRheom_20101203_02.wmv or
other videos
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Chris Schanzle schan...@nist.gov wrote:
On 01/12/2011 03:40 PM, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Chris Schanzle schan...@nist.gov
wrote:
Hi,
Firefox and seamonkey crash on CentOS 5.5 (we use x86_64, haven't
tried
i386
1 - 100 of 488 matches
Mail list logo
