Hi all,
I've got this weird situation after upgrading to the latest tuxonice kernel
(kernel-tuxonice-2.6.22.9-91_1.cubbi_tuxonice.fc7.i686) where I'll get an
device already mounted or mount point busy on my /boot patition during
startup after which the system refuses to continue allowing me drop
Ok, figured out that commenting out the LABEL=/boot line in fstab (from the
rescue cd) will at least let me boot.
No to figure out WHY this is happening and HOW to get back to normal.
Hints appeciated :)
Cheers,
-Tako
On 10/30/07, Tako Schotanus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I've got
Hey! Quit referring only to Gnome, it works perfectly well on KDE too :-p
But that was not why I was replying, I just wanted to see if anyone on the
list had any problems getting the graphical suspend to work on a
dual-monitor setup? It's as if the framebuffer does not get enabled the
moment I
On 8/11/07, Paulo Cavalcanti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone else having trouble with mldonkey?
No, works perfectly for me.
Good luck,
-Tako
___
atrpms-users mailing list
atrpms-users@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
On 8/3/07, Axel Thimm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 09:20:03PM +0200, Tako Schotanus wrote:
Just out of curiosity, why the name change to tux on ice?
That's an upstream change, not a package level change. I also don't
know why, but I assume it's to differentiate from
installing things until I
noticed I had to point to the Everything part of the official Fedora 7
repository. :-)
Now everything works fine.
On 6/3/07, Axel Thimm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 10:04:29PM +0200, Tako Schotanus wrote:
Ok, but installing it has already removed
Ok, but installing it has already removed the original lines :-)
Any way to get them back? (No idea which F7 package provided them
originally)
Cheers,
-Tako
On 6/3/07, Axel Thimm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 10:01:40AM -0400, Jeff Guerdat wrote:
Axel Thimm wrote:
On
Hi,
I just noticed that the latest atrpms-package-config removes the
kde-redhat, livna and flash channels from any package managers.
I can't remember having seen any discussion about this so I wondered why
this was done?
Cheers,
-Tako
___
Hi,
I just noticed that the latest atrpms-package-config removes the
kde-redhat, livna and flash channels from any package managers.
I can't remember having seen any discussion about this so I wondered why
this was done?
Cheers,
-Tako
___
Tako Schotanus wrote:
Hey, thanks for that bit of information, I got the same problem but
because I just bought the card I had no idea what could be the cause of it.
So now the Oops is gone but of course my card still doesn't want to work ;-)
Any chance that you've got an AverMedia DVB-T
Axel Thimm wrote:
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 12:39:25AM +0200, Tako Schotanus wrote:
Axel Thimm wrote:
On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 07:18:54PM +0200, Tako Schotanus wrote:
Axel Thimm wrote:
On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 12:33:00PM +0100, John Pilkington wrote
Axel Thimm wrote:
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 05:31:38PM +0200, Tako Schotanus wrote:
Axel Thimm wrote:
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 10:12:19PM +0200, Tako Schotanus wrote:
Well, the subject says it all I think: I just can't seem to install any
of the kernel modules
Axel Thimm wrote:
On Sat, Mar 25, 2006 at 10:34:45AM +, Tony wrote:
On 3/25/06, Axel Thimm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd prefer to discuss this on the list, so anyone else can jump in.
No probs- but becasue of the way I feed and label 70+ lists into this
gmail account, I am
Axel Thimm wrote:
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 08:23:02PM +0100, Tako Schotanus wrote:
Axel Thimm wrote:
On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 08:26:09PM +0100, Tako Schotanus wrote:
Tako Schotanus wrote:
Like I said, I just use Matthias Henslers src package and compiled the
kernel rpm
Tako Schotanus wrote:
Axel Thimm wrote:
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 08:23:02PM +0100, Tako Schotanus wrote:
Axel Thimm wrote:
On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 08:26:09PM +0100, Tako Schotanus wrote:
Tako Schotanus wrote:
Like I said, I just use
Axel Thimm wrote:
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 05:11:16PM +0100, Tako Schotanus wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 11:53:25AM -0500, David Asher wrote:
Ok, I had this saved this message for the day that I would finally get
round to compiling some packages of my own but of course I have
Tako Schotanus wrote:
Like I said, I just use Matthias Henslers src package and compiled the
kernel rpm, so that works.
The only thing left is to do the same for the modules. It would seem so
easy, if it really is just pointing the macros to the kernel sources
it would be a bunch of rmbuild
Axel Thimm wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 11:53:25AM -0500, David Asher wrote:
I installed transcode-1.0.2-22.rhfc4.at.src.rpm so I could rebuild it
locally (I'm having trouble with transcode and want to play around with it).
I've never built an RPM from an atrpms .spec file before, what am
Hi,
with the release of FC5 around the corner can something be said about
the best way to upgrade from FC4 to FC5?
I haven't read anything to the contrary but I must say I haven't read
much at all about FC5 and upgrading it from previous versions of FC.
Does anyone have any experinces to
Axel Thimm wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 06:42:05PM +0100, Tako Schotanus wrote:
M. Barnabas Luntzel wrote:
On Feb 13, 2006, at 9:17 AM, Tako Schotanus wrote:
M. Barnabas Luntzel wrote:
the DB schema upgrade fails. as far as I can tell it is trying to
add
M. Barnabas Luntzel wrote:
On Feb 13, 2006, at 9:17 AM, Tako Schotanus wrote:
M. Barnabas Luntzel wrote:
the DB schema upgrade fails. as far as I can tell it is trying to
add the generic column twice. I deleted it by hand, tried to
start mythbackend, then got the same error
Axel Thimm wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 10:35:55PM +0100, Tako Schotanus wrote:
Hi Axel,
have the patches from this thread
(http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=62021) been applied to
the driver? Just asking because of the ACPI patch (why do they always
seem
Hi Axel,
have the patches from this thread
(http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=62021) been applied to
the driver? Just asking because of the ACPI patch (why do they always
seem to have acpi-related patches? ;-)
Still trying to get hibernate to work, but the nvidia drivers still
Alexander Bergolth wrote:
Hi!
On 11/14/05 12:46, Axel Thimm wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 10:21:02AM +0100, Alexander Bergolth wrote:
On 11/13/2005 10:30 PM, Tako Schotanus wrote:
Axel Thimm wrote:
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 12:11:07PM -0500, Tom E. Craddock Jr
But why would you want to use synaptic to downoad your packages and
smart to install them?
I can understand that if you are on a slow line and have used synaptic
before that you would want to do this, but it would be a one-time
operation, wouldn't it?
Cheers,
-Tako
John Pilkington wrote:
A
Martin Lubich wrote:
On Monday 16 January 2006 19:06, Axel Thimm wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 01:19:51PM +, John Pilkington wrote:
Synaptic has just been removed from the fc3 repo. I have used it with
the setting that retained the rpm files in the cache after installation.
I don't expect that the current nVidia drivers in the repository include
the patches that nVidia (unofficialy I guess) released ? :-)
http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=62021
Cheers,
-Tako
___
atrpms-users mailing list
Axel Thimm wrote:
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 02:16:14PM +0100, Tako Schotanus wrote:
Axel Thimm wrote:
2) When I set output to XvMC it does full framerate but still consumes
about
50% CPU which is not normal I believe. Also sound is stuttering.
One good thing is that the image quality
That's a known problem with the x86_64 version, you'll have to manually
install the rpms like this:
rpm -Uhv
http://dl.atrpms.net/all/fedora-release-4-2_3.rhfc4.at.noarch.rpm
http://dl.atrpms.net/all/fedora-release-4-2_3.rhfc4.at.noarch.rpm
Axel Thimm wrote:
You're welcome, I'll let Alex know. BTW who's Alex? ;)
(np. I was raised in a country, where everyone called my Alex, because
they never heard of Axel before :)
Hahaha, must be dyslexic today, sorry Axel :-)
-Tako
___
Matthias Hensler wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 03:45:45AM +0100, Axel Thimm wrote:
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 01:52:54PM +0100, Mark Wormgoor wrote:
Ok, I'm running this kernel now and it seems just as stable as the
regular Fedora kernels. It's got my blessing ;)
Got the message.
Axel Thimm wrote:
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 12:40:35AM +0100, Tako Schotanus wrote:
No, that's because apt does not work on multilibed systems, or placed
differently it cannot cope with packages for different architetcures
having the same name, like the two glibc packages for i386 and x86_64
Axel Thimm wrote:
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 12:40:35AM +0100, Tako Schotanus wrote:
No, that's because apt does not work on multilibed systems, or placed
differently it cannot cope with packages for different architetcures
having the same name, like the two glibc packages for i386 and x86_64
Marcel Janssen wrote:
On Saturday 05 November 2005 15:31, Tako Schotanus wrote:
Unless somebody in the future can tell me they have a working x86_64
that includes a working firefox+flash+java, mplayer+win32codecs and
cedega without too many upgrade hassles I'll stick with i386 for now
Axel Thimm wrote:
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 07:36:49PM +0100, Tako Schotanus wrote:
Is there any easy way to get things like the win32codecs for mplayer and
the flash plugin for firefox working when running a 64bits system?
The only thing I can currently think of is: download all necessary
Is there any easy way to get things like the win32codecs for mplayer and
the flash plugin for firefox working when running a 64bits system?
The only thing I can currently think of is: download all necessary RPMs
from the i386 folder in the repository, extract the files from them and
instal
Matthias Hensler wrote:
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 12:46:55PM +0200, Alexander Bergolth wrote:
On 10/03/2005 06:36 PM, Axel Thimm wrote:
On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 11:57:47AM +0200, Alexander Bergolth wrote:
Do you think it would make sense to combine the suspend2 and
Axel Thimm wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 06:39:40PM +0200, Tako Schotanus wrote:
Axel Thimm wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 06:33:14PM +0200, Tako Schotanus wrote:
Axel Thimm wrote:
On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 12:51:00PM +0200, Tako Schotanus wrote:
Just
Axel Thimm wrote:
On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 12:51:00PM +0200, Tako Schotanus wrote:
Just wondered who I have to bribe^H^H^H^H^Hconvince to get NTFS and
Software Suspend included in the ATrpms repo? :-)
In fact NTFS is not much of a problem because the site delivers a large
amount
Axel Thimm wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 06:33:14PM +0200, Tako Schotanus wrote:
Axel Thimm wrote:
On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 12:51:00PM +0200, Tako Schotanus wrote:
Just wondered who I have to bribe^H^H^H^H^Hconvince to get NTFS and
Software Suspend included in the ATrpms repo
Axel Thimm wrote:
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 01:40:40PM +0200, Tako Schotanus wrote:
NB, another system gives these warnings:
W: Release file did not contain checksum information for
http://kde-redhat.atrpms.net/apt/kde-redhat/fedora/4/i386/base/pkglist.stable
W: Release file did not contain
the state folder before updating)
Cheers,
-Tako
Tako Schotanus wrote:
Axel Thimm wrote:
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 12:35:16PM +0200, Tako Schotanus wrote:
is it possible that something has gone wrong with an update/copy
somewhere because I get all kinds of errors trying to update.
apt-get
Axel Thimm wrote:
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 12:35:16PM +0200, Tako Schotanus wrote:
is it possible that something has gone wrong with an update/copy
somewhere because I get all kinds of errors trying to update.
apt-get update gives these errors for example (just a selection):
98% [4
Tako Schotanus wrote:
Axel Thimm wrote:
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 12:35:16PM +0200, Tako Schotanus wrote:
is it possible that something has gone wrong with an update/copy
somewhere because I get all kinds of errors trying to update.
apt-get update gives these errors for example (just
44 matches
Mail list logo
