On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 04:15:16PM -0500, Adam Forsyth wrote: > Let me know if there is something better to do with this info than > post it to this list. I also emailed the ccrma maintainer about that > part of the problem. It's not a big deal but it's a nuisance every > time I run smart or yum upgrade. > > With smart on fc4, I have two cyclical upgrades between atrpms > packages and those from other repos: > > 1. alsa-lib / libasound2 from atrpms vs. alsa-lib (provides > libasound2) from planetccrma. > 2. directfb / mplayer from atrpms vs. directfb from extras and mplayer > from freshrpms. > > Yum sees the atrpms alsa-lib / libasound2 packages as newer than the > ccrma ones, so has no problem there,
But you do mention cyclical upgrades for alsa, too, or not? Do you mean that smart/apt do cyclical updates, and yum doesn't? > but yields this error regarding > the mplayer / directfb dependency: --> Populating transaction set with > selected packages. Please wait. > Error: Missing Dependency: libdirectfb-0.9.so.20 is needed by package mplayer Yes, that was mentioned on this list and even filed as a bug: http://bugzilla.atrpms.net/show_bug.cgi?id=644 > I have the following repos enabled: atprms-testing atrpms-stable > updates extras freshrpms dag dries nrpms newrpms planetcore > planetccrma. All are setup in smart as rpm-md repos. The repo biting you here is extras. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
pgpIr1bui604S.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ atrpms-users mailing list atrpms-users@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
