Re: [AUCTeX] Re: Problems with preview-latex from AUCTeX-11.84

2007-11-01 Thread David Kastrup
Tassilo Horn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: David Kastrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi David, Your PDF file contains garbage. This breaks pdf2dsc, and the resulting incomplete Pseudo-PostScript file contains only 5 marked pages rather than 124 or more. Do you think that this is caused by

Re: [AUCTeX] Re: Problems with preview-latex from AUCTeX-11.84

2007-11-01 Thread David Kastrup
Tassilo Horn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: David Kastrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Your PDF file contains garbage. This breaks pdf2dsc, and the resulting incomplete Pseudo-PostScript file contains only 5 marked pages rather than 124 or more. Do you think that this is caused by something I use

Re: [AUCTeX] Re: Problems with preview-latex from AUCTeX-11.84

2007-11-01 Thread Tassilo Horn
David Kastrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Your PDF file contains garbage. This breaks pdf2dsc, and the resulting incomplete Pseudo-PostScript file contains only 5 marked pages rather than 124 or more. Do you think that this is caused by something I use in my document or my TeX distribution?

Re: [AUCTeX] Re: Problems with preview-latex from AUCTeX-11.84

2007-11-01 Thread Tassilo Horn
David Kastrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Yes, pdflatex doesn't complain and the resulting pdf works fine with kpdf or doc-view. Does it work with Ghostscript? Ghostview or one of the other Ghostscript-based PDF viewers? I tried kghostview and it couldn't open it: Error: /typecheck in