[AUCTeX-devel] [PATCH] Various patches

Hi all, please find attached 4 patches improving some styles I touched recently. My apologies for not getting it right last time. * style/enumitem.el (LaTeX-enumitem-newlist-list) (LaTeX-enumitem-newlist-list-item-arg) (LaTeX-auto-enumitem-newlist): Remove variables.

Re: [AUCTeX] overlay prompting

Le 15 janv. 2016 à 10:57, jfbu a écrit : > Le 15/01/2016 10:42, jfbu a écrit : >> Le 15/01/2016 10:38, Mosè Giordano a écrit : >>> Hi Jean-François, >>> >>> 2016-01-15 10:36 GMT+01:00 jfbu : Le 15/01/2016 10:32, jfbu a écrit : > > Hi, > > I am

Re: [AUCTeX] overlay prompting

Hi Jean-François, 2016-01-24 10:38 GMT+01:00 jfbu : > Sorry for the delay. It was a very big file, with complicated > non-typical structure (thousands of lines before \documentclass), > and I should have focused on where "beamer" actually appeared in > the file, but did not have the

Re: [AUCTeX] overlay prompting

Le 24 janv. 2016 à 15:14, Mosè Giordano a écrit : > Hi Jean-François, > > 2016-01-24 10:38 GMT+01:00 jfbu : >> Sorry for the delay. It was a very big file, with complicated >> non-typical structure (thousands of lines before \documentclass), >> and I should have

Re: [AUCTeX] overlay prompting

Le 24 janv. 2016 à 15:25, Mosè Giordano a écrit : > 2016-01-24 15:19 GMT+01:00 jfbu : >> Thanks for the tip. Could the parsing possibly decide not to take >> into account a second `\documentclass` ? > > I'm not sure this is feasible. If I remember well, I once

Re: [AUCTeX] overlay prompting

Le 24 janv. 2016 à 15:46, Mosè Giordano a écrit : > 2016-01-24 15:14 GMT+01:00 Mosè Giordano : >> The obvious >> fix would be to do said test, but I fear parsing time would increase >> sensibly. I should do some tests. > > In a 1850-line-long document of mine,

Re: [AUCTeX] overlay prompting

2016-01-24 15:19 GMT+01:00 jfbu : > Thanks for the tip. Could the parsing possibly decide not to take > into account a second `\documentclass` ? I'm not sure this is feasible. If I remember well, I once proposed to do have a parsing for preamble stuff (\documentclass, \usepackage,

Re: [AUCTeX] overlay prompting

2016-01-24 15:49 GMT+01:00 jfbu : > how do you time the parsing ? With `benchmark-run'. In the file buffer run M-: (benchmark-run (TeX-auto-parse)) RET The first argument of `benchmark-run' can be the number of the repetitions of the form. Cheers, Mosè

Re: [AUCTeX] overlay prompting

2016-01-24 16:05 GMT+01:00 jfbu : > > Le 24 janv. 2016 à 15:54, Mosè Giordano a écrit : > >> 2016-01-24 15:49 GMT+01:00 jfbu : >>> how do you time the parsing ? >> >> With `benchmark-run'. In the file buffer run >> >>M-: (benchmark-run

Re: [AUCTeX] overlay prompting

Le 24 janv. 2016 à 15:54, Mosè Giordano a écrit : > 2016-01-24 15:49 GMT+01:00 jfbu : >> how do you time the parsing ? > > With `benchmark-run'. In the file buffer run > >M-: (benchmark-run (TeX-auto-parse)) RET > > The first argument of `benchmark-run' can

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] save-excursion and Emacs 25

On 2016-01-24, at 01:08, Mosè Giordano wrote: > Hi Marcin, Hi! >> Would you want me to run such search? > > I guess you have more experience than me in addressing this particular > problem, so if you volunteer to run the search it's fine with me, > otherwise I can try to do that

[AUCTeX-diffs] GNU AUCTeX branch, master, updated. ba7755d1b778b21e5e6e1723bd38bcbec0acf6de

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "GNU AUCTeX". The branch, master has been updated via ba7755d1b778b21e5e6e1723bd38bcbec0acf6de (commit) via

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] [PATCH] Various patches

Hi Arash, 2016-01-24 10:42 GMT+01:00 Arash Esbati : > Hi all, > > please find attached 4 patches improving some styles I touched recently. > My apologies for not getting it right last time. > > * style/enumitem.el (LaTeX-enumitem-newlist-list) >

Re: [AUCTeX] overlay prompting

On Sun, Jan 24 2016, jfbu wrote: > The \documentclass{beamer} arises on line 1890. > > So if you set `TeX-auto-parse-length' to some value about 1500, > that will fix it for me ;;;---) Can't you put a ZERO WIDTH NO-BREAK SPACE (U+FEFF) in the \documentclass{beamer} line inside the

bug#22390: Spurious backquote in reftex-ref.el

Hi Arash, 2016-01-24 10:28 GMT+01:00 Arash Esbati : > Tassilo Horn writes: > >> Mosè Giordano writes: >> >>> Thanks for the patch, the spurious backquote has been introduces a few >>> months ago, within what I guess was a massive search-and-replace >>>