Re: [AUCTeX-devel] [AUCTeX] GNU AUCTeX 11.89.4 released to ELPA

2016-05-23 Thread Tassilo Horn
Marcin Borkowski writes: Hi Marcin, > BTW, here is a snippet from my init.el which removes one of these > rough edges: > > (add-to-list 'tex--prettify-symbols-alist '("\\mathbb{R}" . 8477) t) > (add-to-list 'tex--prettify-symbols-alist '("\\mathbb{N}" . 8469) t) > (add-to-list

Re: [AUCTeX] [AUCTeX-devel] GNU AUCTeX 11.89.4 released to ELPA

2016-05-23 Thread Tassilo Horn
Marcin Borkowski writes: Hi Marcin, > BTW, here is a snippet from my init.el which removes one of these > rough edges: > > (add-to-list 'tex--prettify-symbols-alist '("\\mathbb{R}" . 8477) t) > (add-to-list 'tex--prettify-symbols-alist '("\\mathbb{N}" . 8469) t) > (add-to-list

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] [AUCTeX] GNU AUCTeX 11.89.4 released to ELPA

2016-05-23 Thread Joost Kremers
On Sun, May 22 2016, Uwe Brauer wrote: > I stayed with Xemacs > mostly because of x-symbol but now GNU emacs 25 supports prettifying. > > Which brings me to different question, when will 25 official be > released? Because I think the documentation should say something about > prettifying (but

Re: [AUCTeX] [AUCTeX-devel] GNU AUCTeX 11.89.4 released to ELPA

2016-05-23 Thread Joost Kremers
On Sun, May 22 2016, Uwe Brauer wrote: > I stayed with Xemacs > mostly because of x-symbol but now GNU emacs 25 supports prettifying. > > Which brings me to different question, when will 25 official be > released? Because I think the documentation should say something about > prettifying (but