> Tassilo Horn writes:
> Ikumi Keita writes:
>> OK, the attached revised patch includes a new test.
> Looks good. Is there a problem with just adding a
> (defvar TeX-test-dummy-alist nil)
> for the test variable and then declaring lexical-binding t for the file?
> Usually, the test are
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "GNU AUCTeX".
The branch, master has been updated
via b326502954199d5f4339f09e82dfd1dcb32ca1d6 (commit)
from
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "GNU AUCTeX".
The branch, master has been updated
via b326502954199d5f4339f09e82dfd1dcb32ca1d6 (commit)
from
Hi,
I recently made some graphics which I outsourced into their own files. I
used the `standalone` document class for this. For some reason, in these
files, the variable `TeX-PDF-from-DVI` is automatically set.
Minimal example:
> \documentclass[tikz,border=5pt]{standalone}
>
> \begin{document}
Ikumi:
It does appear to have fixed the problem. I am no longer getting the warnings.
Thanks for the patch.
Michael
> On Jan 7, 2021, at 6:17 AM, Ikumi Keita wrote:
>
> Hi Itaï, Luke, Braun,
>
> Sorry for late response. It seems that I managed to fix the bug of
> preview-latex you reported
Hello,
This may not be of direct use but I use AucTeX under Windows with emacs27.
I use straight for package management and a simple:
(straight-use-package 'auctex)
in the init makes everything work out of the box. The only issue that I had
is that I have to define keybindings in a hook that I
On Sat 9 Jan 2021 at 17:18 Joost Kremers wrote:
> I do:
>
> ```
> (use-package tex-site
> :ensure auctex
> :config ...)
> ```
>
> Before use-package, before package.el even, `(require 'tex-site)` was the way
> to
> load AUCTeX, so I kept `tex-site` when I switched to use-package.
>
>
Ikumi Keita writes:
> OK, the attached revised patch includes a new test.
Looks good. Is there a problem with just adding a
(defvar TeX-test-dummy-alist nil)
for the test variable and then declaring lexical-binding t for the file?
Usually, the test are only run thru make, and then there's
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "GNU AUCTeX".
The branch, master has been updated
via b465e383472725d6885b811f97985cc38f5226cd (commit)
from
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "GNU AUCTeX".
The branch, master has been updated
via b465e383472725d6885b811f97985cc38f5226cd (commit)
from
Pastiche P writes:
> The error is gone, but I'm not sure AUCTeX itself is properly
> loaded. E.g., the command LaTeX-section is undefined. Or perhaps I'm
> misunderstanding something?
Sorry, I think I wanted to suggest this recipe:
(use-package tex-site
:ensure auctex
:config
(setq
Hi Tassilo,
On Fri, Jan 08 2021, Tassilo Horn wrote:
>> Anyone know what's going on?
>
> Yes, me! Fixed in Git. I've just released auctex 13.0.3 on ELPA with a
> fix (just some hours after I've had released 13.0.2). :-)
Thanks! Updated and now it works. :-)
--
Joost Kremers
Life has its
On Sat, Jan 09 2021, Greg Bognar via General discussion about AUCTeX wrote:
>> Pastiche P writes:
>>
>> The error is gone, but I'm not sure AUCTeX itself is properly loaded. E.g.,
>> the command LaTeX-section is undefined. Or perhaps I'm misunderstanding
>> something?
>
> In my experience, you
> Pastiche P writes:
>
> The error is gone, but I'm not sure AUCTeX itself is properly loaded. E.g.,
> the command LaTeX-section is undefined. Or perhaps I'm misunderstanding
> something?
In my experience, you need to do
(use-package latex
:ensure auctex
:mode ("\\.tex\\'" . LaTeX-mode)
> Tassilo Horn writes:
> While you are at it, could you please add some TeX-add-to-alist tests to
> our suite. Looking at your relevant diff hunk it is obvious that this
> function isn't trivial and some tests are justified.
OK, the attached revised patch includes a new test.
>> and
The error is gone, but I'm not sure AUCTeX itself is properly loaded. E.g.,
the command LaTeX-section is undefined. Or perhaps I'm misunderstanding
something?
Thanks!
On Sat, 9 Jan 2021 at 11:18, Tassilo Horn wrote:
> Pastiche P writes:
>
> Hi Pastiche,
>
> > I just installed AUCTeX 13.0.1
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "GNU AUCTeX".
The branch, master has been updated
via eba6bab8c1f9f699c51d381f4fad3d967128909d (commit)
from
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "GNU AUCTeX".
The branch, master has been updated
via eba6bab8c1f9f699c51d381f4fad3d967128909d (commit)
from
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "GNU AUCTeX".
The branch, master has been updated
via 83d68ae7b43bb07b59d49748fc7099968bfd712e (commit)
from
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "GNU AUCTeX".
The branch, master has been updated
via 83d68ae7b43bb07b59d49748fc7099968bfd712e (commit)
from
Pastiche P writes:
Hi Pastiche,
> I just installed AUCTeX 13.0.1 using M-x list-packages. This is Emacs
> 27.1 under Windows.
>
> I put this in my config:
>
> (use-package tex
> :ensure auctex
> :config
> (setq TeX-auto-save t)
> (setq TeX-parse-self t))
>
> Whenever I open a *.tex
Ikumi Keita writes:
Hi Ikumi,
>>> I did notice, BTW, that this function uses `add-to-list`, the doc
>>> string of which warns against using it in Lisp code.
>
>> Yes, you should definitely not use it on lexical local variables.
>> With AUCTeX 13, we switched to lexical-binding, and now that
Version 13.0.3 of package Auctex has just been released in GNU ELPA.
You can now find it in M-x package-list RET.
Auctex describes itself as:
Integrated environment for *TeX*
More at https://elpa.gnu.org/packages/auctex.html
I just installed AUCTeX 13.0.1 using M-x list-packages. This is Emacs 27.1
under Windows.
I put this in my config:
(use-package tex
:ensure auctex
:config
(setq TeX-auto-save t)
(setq TeX-parse-self t))
Whenever I open a *.tex file, I get
Debugger entered--Lisp error: (void-function
Hi Tassilo and all,
> Tassilo Horn writes:
>> I did notice, BTW, that this function uses `add-to-list`, the doc
>> string of which warns against using it in Lisp code.
> Yes, you should definitely not use it on lexical local variables. With
> AUCTeX 13, we switched to lexical-binding, and
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "GNU AUCTeX".
The branch, master has been updated
via 74f5675333c40d58b441d87e964429f309ba4b91 (commit)
from
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "GNU AUCTeX".
The branch, master has been updated
via 74f5675333c40d58b441d87e964429f309ba4b91 (commit)
from
27 matches
Mail list logo
