Hi again,
sorry, attached is a patch which can actually be applied.
Bye,
Tassilo
diff --git a/tex.el b/tex.el
index ab6d3d9e..c93e723a 100644
--- a/tex.el
+++ b/tex.el
@@ -3322,6 +3322,17 @@ The variable will be temporarily let-bound with the necessary value.")
(defvar TeX-macro-history nil)
Hongyi Zhao writes:
>> Could someone here give a minimal working example for the question
>> discussed here with `completion-table-dynamic'?
>
> I found an example here [1], but I still can't figure out how to
> modify it to meet the problems discussed in this topic:
Here's a patch against
On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 8:32 PM Hongyi Zhao wrote:
>
> On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 10:29 PM Tassilo Horn wrote:
> >
> > Tassilo Horn writes:
> >
> > > Or are you asking if that will make that work for all standard AUCTeX
> > > completion functions. I guess so, although just setting
> > >
> > >
On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 10:29 PM Tassilo Horn wrote:
>
> Tassilo Horn writes:
>
> > Or are you asking if that will make that work for all standard AUCTeX
> > completion functions. I guess so, although just setting
> >
> > (setq-local completion-extra-properties
> >
Hi all,
I think that `TeX-complete-make-expert-command-functions' has some
inconsistencies in its implementation.
We have currently the following code in tex.el:
--
(defmacro TeX-complete-make-expert-command-functions (thing
Hi Arash,
> Arash Esbati writes:
> I like the idea, but `LaTeX-default-tabular-environment' is notoriously
> the one I currently don't want. Should we change this part a little in
> order to give users a chance to pick up what they want? I'm thinking
> about a change like this:
It looks
