Hi Zhao,
I have only dabbled with the various new version of Biblex as they have come
along in the 30+ years since I wrote my PhD thesis in LaTeX and became a
convert. I know from many papers, grants, and theses since then that standard
BibTeX works fine.
Of course, I do not want to sound
Dear AUCTeX community,
I hope this email finds you well. I am currently writing an academic
paper and have been using AUCTeX for LaTeX editing. I am wondering if
it is always recommended to prefer BibLaTeX over BibTeX when working
in AUCTeX for academic writing.
I am aware that BibLaTeX is a
branch: master
commit 22ba857c53ca633f93b543328a17e01825961817
Author: Arash Esbati
Commit: Arash Esbati
Improve fontification within shortvrb delimiters
* style/shortvrb.el ("shortvrb"): Use
`font-latex-syntactic-keywords-extra' for fontification instead of
Hi Keita,
Ikumi Keita writes:
> Yes. A major obstacle is that `syntax-propertize-rules' doesn't accept
> an entry of the form
> (REGEXP-OR-FUNC (1 "\"") (2 ".") (3 "\""))
Really? I think the docstring says that it should work the way you
describe above:
,[ C-h f syntax-propertize-rules
