Karl Semich:
> Would it be reasonable for aufs to refrain from copying up if only the
> ctime is changed? Perhaps a mount option to ignore isolated ctime
> changes?
Hmm, I think I can understand your point.
But it won't be so easy to decide because it is against a generic
filesystem behaviour.
Hi,
On 3/8/16, sf...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
>
> Splitting file-data and meta-data will break these policies.
>
> For your case, I'd suggest you to try
> $ find /your/dir \! -user userA | xargs -r chown userB
I think the problem is when this occurs
Hello Karl,
Karl Semich:
> I was wondering if there could be some way to deduplicate in this
> scenario? Such that when the ctime needs to be updated, just some
> small metafile is copied up, and not all the contents which could be
> many gigabytes?
Many years ago, I had thought about