On 12/06/15 07:45 AM, Martti Kühne wrote:
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Magnus Therning mag...@therning.org
wrote:
No, and valuable != popular :)
Any popularity contest is going to be biased in some way. This is as
good a bias as any other.
And let's leave completely out of focus that
On 14/06/15 09:03 AM, Joakim Hernberg wrote:
On Sun, 14 Jun 2015 14:01:45 +0200 Lukas Fleischer
lfleisc...@archlinux.org wrote:
We cannot merge comments easily as there would be conflicts with
comments added on aur4.archlinux.org in the meantime.
Why would there be conflicts merging the
Em 18-06-2015 19:27, LoneVVolf escreveu:
Should we allow such programs in AUR ?
You're mistaking a tool for its uses. I have some packages on the AUR
that could also help protect criminals. Should I also remove these
packages from AUR? Let's ban criptography, because it also protect
Hi,
While browsing AUR4 orphaned pacakges, i noticed cudahashcat with
description Worlds fastest password cracker with dictionary mutation
engine .
There are atleast 2 more packages from the same upstream,
http://hashcat.net/oclhashcat/ .
I realise it and can be useful for people that
On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 00:27:14 +0200 LoneVVolf lonew...@xs4all.nl wrote:
I realise it and can be useful for people that forgot their own
password, there are many illegal/immoral uses for it.
It's useful not just for forgotten passwords, but for
penetration/security testing as well as
On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 15:38:29 -0700, Patrick Burroughs (Celti) wrote:
On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 00:27:14 +0200 LoneVVolf lonew...@xs4all.nl
wrote:
I realise it and can be useful for people that forgot their own
password, there are many illegal/immoral uses for it.
It's useful not just for forgotten
As one of the maintainers of one of the hashcat packages, I am a firm believer
that such programs should be allowed. They are not illegal, have plenty of
legal and moral use cases and are widely available elsewhere (why put a
non-universal constraint on a single set of programs with virtually
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 156 packages missing signoffs
* 4 packages older than 14
