Re: [aur-general] Handling of virtual packages

On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 09:19:10AM +0200, Martin Kühne via aur-general wrote: > > It is also a good idea to use conflicts=() to prevent packages from > providing the same thing from being installed. I'd clarify this by saying that if two packages have conflicting files, pacman will still not

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 5 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 1 fully signed off package * 20 packages missing signoffs * 8 packages older than 14 days

Re: [aur-general] Handling of virtual packages

On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 10:12 PM, buckket wrote: > As there some programs out there which use redo’s .do files in their > building process it’s important that they can specify redo, or any of > the existing implementations in their makedepends. But as far as I know > there is no