Re: [aur-general] Copy package from AUR archive

2016-09-30 Thread Eli Schwartz via aur-general
On 09/30/2016 03:22 PM, Yassine Imounachen via aur-general wrote: > OK what I did really mean is how to update it Let's try that again. > the rules for submitting a deleted AUR3 package are of course the > same rules as for submitting a brand-new package. The old, AUR3 version will give you a

Re: [aur-general] Copy package from AUR archive

2016-09-30 Thread Martin Kühne via aur-general
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 9:22 PM, Yassine Imounachen via aur-general wrote: > OK what I did really mean is how to update it > That is a very unspecific question and in practice the answer may be two little changes (version numbers) or a total rewrite of the build and

Re: [aur-general] Copy package from AUR archive

2016-09-30 Thread Yassine Imounachen via aur-general
OK what I did really mean is how to update it On 30 Sep 2016 6:43 pm, "Yassine Imounachen" wrote: > Hello, > What are good practices of re-submitting deleted AUR3 packages? Namely > 'strongswan-git'. >

Re: [aur-general] Copy package from AUR archive

2016-09-30 Thread Eli Schwartz via aur-general
On 09/30/2016 01:43 PM, Yassine Imounachen via aur-general wrote: > Hello, > What are good practices of re-submitting deleted AUR3 packages? Namely > 'strongswan-git'. > There are no official good practices, but IMPHO, all packages migrated from the AUR3 (whether deleted or not) *should* have

Re: [aur-general] Copy package from AUR archive

2016-09-30 Thread Noel Kuntze
On 30.09.2016 19:43, Yassine Imounachen via aur-general wrote: > Hello, > What are good practices of re-submitting deleted AUR3 packages? Namely > 'strongswan-git'. > Hello Yassine, For strongSwan, a git package (even though there existed one once) does not make sense, because the git master

[aur-general] Copy package from AUR archive

2016-09-30 Thread Yassine Imounachen via aur-general
Hello, What are good practices of re-submitting deleted AUR3 packages? Namely 'strongswan-git'.

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

2016-09-30 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 1 fully signed off package * 17 packages missing signoffs * 12 packages older than 14