Re: [aur-general] "pepper-flash" naming?

On 2016-11-13 21:12, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > On 11/13/2016 02:01 PM, Det via aur-general wrote: >> That reasoning is pretty obvious. > > Debatable... but thanks for actually (finally) spelling out your reasons > in your initial post here, rather than simply assuming everyone thinks

Re: [aur-general] "pepper-flash" naming?

On 11/13/2016 02:57 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: IMO it would be better to drop all flashplayer related packages from AUR, as well as from the official repositories. While I agree with you on principal, it's an unrealistic expectation. You can't expect a small business, who paid $1000s to a

Re: [aur-general] "pepper-flash" naming?

On Sun, 13 Nov 2016 15:12:56 -0500, Eli Schwartz wrote: >I could think of a bunch of arbitrary names, not just pepper-flash or >flashlugin-ppapi. Since "PPAPI" is for "pepper plugin application programming interface" it makes sense to stay with "pepper" and adding "flash" is useful, because it

Re: [aur-general] "pepper-flash" naming?

On Sun, 13 Nov 2016 13:45:42 -0600, WebDawg via aur-general wrote: >IMO people still need flash to do stuff so I do not know why you would >remove it. While most of us still may hate flash they have decided to >support it again:

Re: [aur-general] "pepper-flash" naming?

On 11/13/2016 02:01 PM, Det via aur-general wrote: > That reasoning is pretty obvious. Debatable... but thanks for actually (finally) spelling out your reasons in your initial post here, rather than simply assuming everyone thinks the way you do. I could think of a bunch of arbitrary names, not

Re: [aur-general] Trusted User Application: Giancarlo Razzolini

> I was aware Jelle went on vacation, which is why I was ok waiting for him > to come back. > As someone mentioned on IRC, TU's are humans too. Anyway, I want to thank > you all for > this opportunity. I will start on the TODO right now. Sorry about that :) Needed some vacation and time

Re: [aur-general] Trusted User Application: Giancarlo Razzolini

> Heh, seems Jelle inconveniently went on vacation just before it ended, so on > behalf of Jelle: > > Congrats grazzolini, you've been accepted! > > Yes: 20 > No: 6 > Abstain: 6 Thanks Johannes for sending this e-mail! I admit I was secretly hiding in the desert! > > Please continue by

Re: [aur-general] "pepper-flash" naming?

On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 3:50 PM, Eli Schwartz via aur-general < aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > > So, in the mailing list you give your actual reasoning, *after* giving a > cryptic comment in the AUR comments and being rejected, and rightly so, > as a crank. That reasoning is pretty obvious.

Re: [aur-general] Co-maintainers not receiving flag-out-of-date notification mails?

On Sun, 13 Nov 2016 at 10:10:52, Chi-Hsuan Yen via aur-general wrote: > I'm the co-maintainer of depot-tools-git. [1] Two weeks ago that package is > flagged as out-of-date, but I didn't receive any notification mail - not in > Spam either. For other packages that I'm the only maintainer,

Re: [aur-general] "pepper-flash" naming?

On 11/13/2016 03:33 AM, Det via aur-general wrote: > Why hell, > > Since the maintainer is throwing his tantrum, I decided it would be good > to ask the mailing list directly, should "pepper-flash" [1] be renamed > to e.g. "flashplugin-ppapi"? > > This would be more in line

Re: [aur-general] "pepper-flash" naming?

On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 11:42 AM, DJ Lucas wrote: > > No. That has historically been the name. Anyone who is already familiar > with flash on Liunx is likely to use "pepper" as a search term. > Yes, but that's a non-issue because the default is to search by "Name,

Re: [aur-general] "pepper-flash" naming?

On 11/13/2016 02:33 AM, Det via aur-general wrote: I decided it would be good to ask the mailing list directly, should "pepper-flash" [1] be renamed to e.g. "flashplugin-ppapi"? No. That has historically been the name. Anyone who is already familiar with flash on Liunx is likely to use

[aur-general] Co-maintainers not receiving flag-out-of-date notification mails?

Hi AUR enthuasiasts, I'm the co-maintainer of depot-tools-git. [1] Two weeks ago that package is flagged as out-of-date, but I didn't receive any notification mail - not in Spam either. For other packages that I'm the only maintainer, out-of-date notifications are well sent. Is it an aurweb bug

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 2 fully signed off packages * 197 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14

Re: [aur-general] "pepper-flash" naming?

On Sun, 13 Nov 2016 10:33:26 +0200, Det via aur-general wrote: >Since the maintainer is throwing his tantrum, I decided it would be >good to ask the mailing list directly, should "pepper-flash" [1] be >renamed to e.g. "flashplugin-ppapi"? People who still want to contribute on the bad thing that

[aur-general] "pepper-flash" naming?

Why hell, Since the maintainer is throwing his tantrum, I decided it would be good to ask the mailing list directly, should "pepper-flash" [1] be renamed to e.g. "flashplugin-ppapi"? This would be more in line with the official package extra/flashplugin [2] and also the