Re: [aur-general] validpgpkeys

On Sun, 11 Dec 2016 20:55:23 +0100, Bruno Pagani wrote: >Personally, I make use of this on as much packages I maintain as >possible, while pinning a comment redirecting to >https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Makepkg#Signature_checking, while >also mentioning --skippgpcheck because it’s always

Re: [aur-general] validpgpkeys

On Sun, 11 Dec 2016 13:54:08 -0600, Doug Newgard wrote: >No, there is no reason to avoid it. The argument that people don't >understand isn't a valid one with Arch. Full ACK. If they want to use a helper without taking care about anything on their own, they could configure their helper to skip

Re: [aur-general] validpgpkeys

Le 11/12/2016 à 20:46, Ralf Mardorf a écrit : > Hi, > > you likely noticed the discussion about "Stronger Hashes for PKGBUILDs" > on Arch general. I wonder if there is any reason to avoid validpgpkeys > for PKGBUILDs of the AUR? > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/freetype2-infinality/ ? > > If

Re: [aur-general] validpgpkeys

On Sun, 11 Dec 2016 20:46:56 +0100 Ralf Mardorf wrote: > Hi, > > you likely noticed the discussion about "Stronger Hashes for PKGBUILDs" > on Arch general. I wonder if there is any reason to avoid validpgpkeys > for PKGBUILDs of the AUR? >

[aur-general] validpgpkeys

Hi, you likely noticed the discussion about "Stronger Hashes for PKGBUILDs" on Arch general. I wonder if there is any reason to avoid validpgpkeys for PKGBUILDs of the AUR? https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/freetype2-infinality/ ? If upstream, e.g. kernel.org signs the source, then IMO nothing

Re: [aur-general] Deletion of xfce4-volumed

On Sun, 11 Dec 2016 13:07:08 +0100, Einhard Leichtfuß wrote: >Unless there is a genral rule not to include discontinued software in >the AUR, I would like to resubmit the package. Hi, even "community" provides discontinued software, e.g.

[aur-general] Deletion of xfce4-volumed

Hi, I just noticed xfce4-volumed having been deleted from AUR. >From the aur-requests archive [0] (2016-12-07): > oberon2007 [1] filed a deletion request for xfce4-volumed [2]: > > Has been discontinued by xfce since 2009. replaced by xfce4-volumed- > pulse > > [1]

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 25 packages missing signoffs * 4 packages older than 14