Re: [aur-general] Wrong E-Mail Adress at registration used

On Sat, 10 Oct 2020 at 08:14:01, Matthias 'garionion' Detsch via aur-general wrote: > Would it be possible, that someone could please unlock "my" username? Done, please use [1] to send yourself a password reset email. Your may also want to consider adding a backup email address to your profile,

Re: [aur-general] Resignation as Trusted User

On Tue, 08 Sep 2020 at 10:44:53, Filipe Laíns via aur-general wrote: > I think he should be set as 'Developer', not normal user. Done.

[aur-general] aurweb 5.0.0 released

Dear aurweb contributors and users, aurweb 5.0.0 has just been released! You can now add a secondary email address that can be used to recover your account in case access to the primary email address is lost. Reset keys for an account are always sent to both the primary and the backup email

Re: [aur-general] Traceback from aurweb upon git push

On Mon, 10 Feb 2020 at 17:18:16, Chris Billington via aur-general wrote: > remote: raise child_exception_type(errno_num, err_msg, err_filename) > remote: PermissionError: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '' Should be fixed. Sorry for the inconvenience.

Re: [aur-general] git push failed 8-(

On Thu, 30 Jan 2020 at 13:34:41, J. Scheurich wrote: > $ git clone ssh://a...@archlinux.org/white_dune.git It's a...@aur.archlinux.org, not a...@archlinux.org.

[aur-general] AUR VCS cleanup

Here's a list of VCS duplicates reported by `aurdupes -V`. I did not check for false positives. Maybe somebody can go through that list and either delete all obsolete packages or file deletion requests: 1pass (VCS) * 1pass-git http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/1pass-git/ * 1pass-hg

[aur-general] AUR cleanup

Here's an up-to-date list of duplicates reported by `aurdupes -A`. I did not check for false positives. Maybe somebody can go through that list and either remove duplicate packages or file deletion requests. I'll post a separate list with VCS duplicates. atlassian-plugin-sdk *

Re: [aur-general] aur client

On Wed, 30 Oct 2019 at 11:04:07, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote: > Would it be good enough for you if I renamed it from "aur" to > "aur-client"? So at least it won't sound like the AUR itself? We currently only block aur and aurweb. There is some gray area but I'd suggest to use another name that

Re: [aur-general] aur client

On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 at 16:07:34, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote: > Lukas Fleischer: > > Another one is that we'd prefer you to not use a name that sounds very > > official for a very unofficial project. > That sounds reasonable in theory, but in practice it does nothing. The &

Re: [aur-general] aur client

On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 at 11:20:27, Alberto Salvia Novella via aur-general wrote: > That would make sense if the package was misleading, but "aur" is an aur > client for publishing to the AUR. It couldn't have clearer naming. There are other reasons you might not want to use this name. One is

[aur-general] aurweb 4.8.0 released

Dear aurweb contributors and users, This is a bit of a late announcement but we are pleased to announce that aurweb 4.8.0 has been released last week! Several bugs have been fixed, we made some significant performance improvements by caching results of expensive database queries, and a simple

Re: [aur-general] Spammers in AUR user comments

On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 at 15:13:32, Daniel M. Capella via aur-general wrote: > On April 5, 2019 7:54:44 AM EDT, NicoHood wrote: > >Should and how can we better protect ourselves from spam comments? > > Perhaps we should add CAPTCHA for account registrations. IIRC, we had an issue with spam bots

Re: [aur-general] pushing new package to aur fails

On Sun, 20 Jan 2019 at 21:48:46, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > [...] > > remote: Traceback (most recent call last): > > remote: File "hooks/update", line 11, in > > remote: load_entry_point('aurweb==4.7.0', 'console_scripts', > > 'aurweb-git-update')() > > remote: File > >

Re: [aur-general] About bullying in our community

Dear community, I am writing on behalf of the Arch Linux team. Despite the initial radio silence, we have been talking about this thread internally and we are still discussing the consequences. We apologize for any emails and actions from our team which may have been inappropriate or

Re: [aur-general] Wrong ownership notification

On Fri, 10 Aug 2018 at 10:47:02, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > On 8/10/18 4:44 AM, Florian Bruhin wrote: > [...] > > However, the package never was orphaned, and at least in the AUR > > webinterface I'm still listed as a maintainer... huh? > > You're not the only one, I gave a patch to

[aur-general] aurweb 4.7.0 released

Dear aurweb contributors and users, We are pleased to announce that aurweb 4.7.0 has been released! New features are the possibility to search by depends as well as an API rate limit in the RPC interface. Moreover, co-maintainers can now remove themselves from the co-maintainer list. This

Re: [aur-general] [tu-bylaws] [PATCH] Clarify the process for Special Removal of an inactive TU

On Sun, 21 Jan 2018 at 21:40:43, Xyne wrote: > On 2018-01-21 10:04 +0100 > Lukas Fleischer via aur-general wrote: > > >So you suggest to remove the first part of the condition (before the > >"OR") altogether? > > I made no such suggestion. By your logic,

Re: [aur-general] [tu-bylaws] [PATCH] Clarify the process for Special Removal of an inactive TU

On Sun, 21 Jan 2018 at 04:24:49, Xyne wrote: > > The intent of the first sectionm before the "OR", is to measure any sort of > > activity. Updating a package, voting or posting a comment shows that the TU > > is still logging in to the AUR and thus active in some sense. The point of > > the first

Re: [aur-general] Special Removal of an Inactive TU: speps

On Sun, 21 Jan 2018 at 04:07:06, Xyne wrote: > Doug Newgard via aur-general wrote: > > >Yes, it is a bit ambiguous. The discussion in #archlinux-tu concluded that > >the > >voting being an the AUR was just happenstance and intent of the section was > >that voting not be included in point 2. With

Re: [aur-general] Special Removal of an Inactive TU: speps

On Thu, 18 Jan 2018 at 22:05:10, Thorsten Toepper wrote: > [...] > Whether the votes happens in the AUR web interface or on a separate > private mailing list is unimportant for the real process I agree, just > at the moment it's the AUR webinterface and the second point is simply > not too well

Re: [aur-general] AUR account registration failed

On Mon, 01 Jan 2018 at 16:51:42, Mauro Santos via aur-general wrote: > On 01-01-2018 14:33, Ian Bashford wrote: > > Hi Lukas, > > > > Thanks for replying quickly. I haven't received your direct mail either... > > (I've checked spam). > > It should be the same address I'm using to post to the

Re: [aur-general] AUR account registration failed

On Mon, 01 Jan 2018 at 14:56:01, Ian Bashford wrote: > I tried creating an aur account ianb, registered for ianbashford \at/ > gmail.com > I didn't receive the confirmation mail, and password resets don't send > anything either. > Would an admin be able to see what's wrong? Replied off-list.

[aur-general] aurweb 4.6.0 released

Dear aurweb contributors and users, We are pleased to announce the release of aurweb 4.6.0! This release brings a lot of improvements to the comment functionality. You can now use basic Markdown syntax to format your comments. Commit hashes to the Git repository of the package and references to

Re: [aur-general] git push - Permissions denied

On Wed, 05 Apr 2017 at 08:01:19, Bruno Pagani via aur-general wrote: > Hum… Didn’t think about searching for the $pkgbase. This kind of things > should not happen, right? Maybe the git interface should check the > presence of a pkgname in .SRCINFO (as well as mismatches with the > PKGBUILD for all

Re: [aur-general] git push - Permissions denied

On Wed, 05 Apr 2017 at 03:43:11, Dan B via aur-general wrote: > Package: aur.archlinux.org/libcs50 > > > » git push > > Enter passphrase for key '/home/krakn/.ssh/id_rsa': > > git-receive-pack: permission denied: krakn > > fatal: Could not read from remote repository. > > > > Please make sure

[aur-general] aurweb 4.5.1 released

Hello, We are pleased to announce aurweb 4.5.1, the first maintenance release for 4.5. The official aurweb setup [1] has already been updated. For a comprehensive list of changes, please consult the Git log [2]. As usual, bugs should be reported to the aurweb bug tracker [3]. [1]

Re: [aur-general] aurweb 4.5.0 released

On Wed, 01 Mar 2017 at 06:51:23, Pablo Roberto Lezaeta Reyes via aur-general wrote: > Ack, translations! I don't remember an anouncement about the string freeze, > so now many languages have missing string, but better just wait until 4.5.1 > to let the teams catch the 4.5 new strings. I know,

Re: [aur-general] Can't register an AUR account

On Sun, 26 Feb 2017 at 19:41:53, Antonio Gutierrez via aur-general wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm trying to create an account in the AUR, I fill in the data and hit > Create, but I just get this undescriptive error at the top: > > Error trying to create account, *'chibby0ne'*. > [...] > Any ideas?

[aur-general] aurweb 4.5.0 released

Dear aurweb contributors and users, aurweb 4.5.0 has just been released. You will notice that after logging in, the home page is now replaced by a dashboard which shows your flagged packages and your recent package requests, followed by a list of your packages. There also is a list of packages

Re: [aur-general] Need a reset link

On Mon, 13 Feb 2017 at 02:51:03, Nobabs27 via aur-general wrote: > Hi, I need a reset link for the account "Nobabs27" on the AUR, but I can't > receive the email because Yahoo. I sent you a new password to your Yahoo email address. Please change it again after logging in. Thanks, Lukas

[aur-general] Voting Results (was: TU Application: Baptiste Jonglez)

On Wed, 07 Dec 2016 at 08:05:59, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > [...] > The discussion period is over. Please cast your votes at [1]. > [...] The voting period has ended. The results are: * Yes: 24 * No: 4 * Abstain: 11 This means that the proposal has been accepted. Congratulations,

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Baptiste Jonglez

On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 at 07:33:16, Baptiste Jonglez wrote: > I would like to apply to become a TU. Lukas Fleischer has kindly accepted > to sponsor my application. > [...] > Don't hesitate if you have any questions, or comments on my AUR packages! The discussion period is over. Plea

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Baptiste Jonglez

On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 at 07:33:16, Baptiste Jonglez wrote: > I would like to apply to become a TU. Lukas Fleischer has kindly accepted > to sponsor my application. I confirm that I sponsor Baptiste. I have worked with him several times in the past; among other things he contributed s

Re: [aur-general] Co-maintainers not receiving flag-out-of-date notification mails?

On Sun, 13 Nov 2016 at 10:10:52, Chi-Hsuan Yen via aur-general wrote: > I'm the co-maintainer of depot-tools-git. [1] Two weeks ago that package is > flagged as out-of-date, but I didn't receive any notification mail - not in > Spam either. For other packages that I'm the only maintainer,

Re: [aur-general] Missing Co-Maintainer Search Criteria on AUR

On Sat, 05 Nov 2016 at 10:00:35, NicoHood wrote: > I think adding a manual co-maintain filter is enough for now (option 2 > without special UI). I do not really need a special button etc, just > somehow an option to show the packages. This way the feature could be > implemented possibly simple

Re: [aur-general] Missing Co-Maintainer Search Criteria on AUR

On Fri, 04 Nov 2016 at 22:24:32, Johannes Löthberg via aur-general wrote: > This belongs on either the bugtracker[0] or aur-dev rather than > aur-general. Essentially the reason there isn't currently support for > it is that both me and Lukas has been rather busy lately, but we'd > gladly

[aur-general] aurweb 4.4.1 released

Just for the record: The first maintenance release for aurweb 4.4 was released yesterday and the official setup [1] was upgraded. For a comprehensive list of changes, consult the Git log [2], and please report bugs to the aurweb bug tracker [3]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/ [2]

[aur-general] aurweb 4.4.0 released

Dear list, I am sending this a bit later than usual -- aurweb 4.4.0 was released yesterday and the official aurweb setup [1] was upgraded a couple of hours ago. You can now change package ownership using the SSH interface, check the new commands in the `ssh a...@aur.archlinux.org help` output

Re: [aur-general] I can't upgrade my package

On Sat, 01 Oct 2016 at 21:34:02, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > Note the additional hyphen. One could argue that git-serve should > support both notations, however, for a short-term fix, you should figure > out why Git sends `git receive-pack` instead of `git-receive-pack`. Even better: I j

Re: [aur-general] I can't upgrade my package

On Sat, 01 Oct 2016 at 21:07:29, Juan Martínez wrote: > [...] > debug1: Remote: Forced command. > debug1: Remote: Port forwarding disabled. > debug1: Remote: X11 forwarding disabled. > debug1: Remote: PTY allocation disabled. > debug1: Remote: Forced command. > debug1: Remote: Port forwarding

Re: [aur-general] I can't upgrade my package

On Sat, 01 Oct 2016 at 20:38:11, Juan Martínez wrote: > El sáb, 01-10-2016 a las 20:25 +0200, Lukas Fleischer escribió: > > On Sat, 01 Oct 2016 at 19:57:55, Juan Martínez wrote: > [...] > Arch: > git version 2.10.0 > > Lubuntu (also tried from here since i have the s

Re: [aur-general] Send Package to AUR

On Mon, 22 Aug 2016 at 18:21:48, Rafael Fontenelle wrote: > 2016-08-22 13:12 GMT-03:00 Tiago R. Lampert : > [...] > I notice the following snippet: > > > remote: error: invalid pkgbase: jsql-injection, expected package_name > > remote: error: hook declined to update

[aur-general] aurweb 4.3.0 released

Dear aurweb contributors and users, aurweb 4.3.0 was released earlier today. Unfortunately, there were some issues with the new database backend which prevented users from accessing the SSH/Git interface of the official aurweb setup [1] for a couple of hours. A patch [2] has been submitted to the

Re: [aur-general] aur-general Digest, Vol 142, Issue 15

On Sat, 13 Aug 2016 at 14:23:42, Dwarf wrote: > > You can send a mail containing 'password' in the message body to > > 'aur-general-request'. You should get your password in the reply. > Thanks for the suggestion, but I forgot to clarify that it's for the > AUR, not the mailing list. You should

Re: [aur-general] There are too many unreachable loose objects; run 'git prune' to remove them.

On Wed, 01 Jun 2016 at 12:10:49, Florian Bruhin wrote: > Hi, > > whenever I push something to the AUR since some days (even a new repo with a > single commit) I get: > > error: The last gc run reported the following. Please correct the > root cause > and remove gc.log. >

[aur-general] Duplicates in the AUR/[community]/[extra]

I did not run aurdupes for a while and in the meantime, the list of packages being both in the AUR and in the official repositories grew quite large (almost 100 packages!): bandit * bandit [community] * bandit http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bandit/ chinese-calendar *

Re: [aur-general] [RFC] Limit the height of AUR comments

On Mon, 07 Mar 2016 at 06:03:53, Mark Weiman wrote: > [...] > It's rather frowned upon to post monolithic comments of that nature. Assuming > your change makes it so that comments are in their own scrollable box if > they're > too long, it would be a change I'd be for. > [...] For dependencies,

[aur-general] aurweb 4.2.0 released

Dear aurweb contributors and users, We are pleased to announce aurweb 4.2.0. The official aurweb setup [1] has already been upgraded. Even though this is only a minor release, the list of new features is longer than usual, which is mostly because we started working on various different requests

Re: [aur-general] Now there is real Spam in the AUR comments - Was: Misuse of AUR (yaourt) comments

On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 at 18:30:04, Tinu Weber wrote: > [...] > There is also spam (from today) on > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/atom-editor/ > And there seems to be another spam comment on the yaourt page right now. > Thanks for reporting! I deleted those comments and suspended the account.

Re: [aur-general] qtikz-git

Hi Stefan, On Sun, 07 Feb 2016 at 18:41:19, Stefan Husmann wrote: > Hello, > > I hav uploaded a package qtikz-git to AUR and got no error message doing so, > but the package did not show up in AUR. > > Should I open a bug report for this? > [...] Looking at the .SRCINFO file [1], there does

Re: [aur-general] Why is the package version still the old one?

On Sun, 29 Nov 2015 at 12:55:02, Iru Cai wrote: > On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 7:41 PM, Johannes Dewender wrote: > > > On 29/11/15 12:18, Iru Cai wrote: > > > I updated babl-git, gegl-git, and gimp-git to AUR. Why are the version > > > of these packages still the old one? The

Re: [aur-general] Issues Pushing

On Wed, 07 Oct 2015 at 12:58:27, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > On Wed, 07 Oct 2015 at 09:41:31, David Phillips wrote: > > Okay, good to know it's being worked on. I seem to recall the TU who > > looked at it mentioning that using separate repositories would use up > > more

Re: [aur-general] Half Deleted Package?

On Thu, 08 Oct 2015 at 07:14:44, Niccolò Maggioni wrote: > It seems that I can clone the repo, but don't have the permission to push > to it. What happened? I'd be glad to hand the package over to a another > maintainer, but this situation is... weird. > [...] It was adopted by David [1]. [1]

Re: [aur-general] Half Deleted Package?

On Thu, 08 Oct 2015 at 15:34:37, David Manouchehri wrote: > Why did it automatically get adopted by me even though I never successfully > pushed anything? When pushing to a nonexistent (hidden) repository, a new package base is created. This happens *before* Git is invoked. At this point, we do

Re: [aur-general] Half Deleted Package?

On Thu, 08 Oct 2015 at 06:54:20, Niccolò Maggioni wrote: > I created the package just before the AUR4 transition, but it somehow got > lost during the upgrade. I'll try to delete any leftover, I'll report back > in a few hours! > [...] It is not possible to remove the Git repository. If you want

Re: [aur-general] Issues Pushing

On Wed, 07 Oct 2015 at 09:41:31, David Phillips wrote: > Okay, good to know it's being worked on. I seem to recall the TU who > looked at it mentioning that using separate repositories would use up > more disc space but avoid this issue? > Slightly more disc space on the server, yes. One idea

Re: [aur-general] Issues Pushing

On Wed, 07 Oct 2015 at 06:40:36, David Phillips wrote: > [...] > I committed changes to an already-established AUR package, and > attempted to push these commits. Running `git push` on my slow > connection just hangs. 'Impatient me' killed it after 5 minutes of > hanging. Trying to push from a

[aur-general] aurweb 4.1.1 released

Hello, We are pleased to announce that aurweb 4.1.1 has been released. The official aurweb setup [1] has already been updated. This is a maintenance release that includes several hotfixes, the most important one fixing the multiinfo command of the RPC interface. For a comprehensive list of

Re: [aur-general] Registration problem

On Sat, 03 Oct 2015 at 14:27:55, Duru Can Celasun wrote: > I was trying to register a second AUR account with my Gmail so I can > use multiple SSH keys, but for some reason I never received the > password reset email. > You don't need a second account for that. You can specify multiple SSH keys

Re: [aur-general] Registration problem

On Sat, 03 Oct 2015 at 15:23:43, Duru Can Celasun wrote: > [...] > > I don't think so. Did you test whether that email address really works > > by manually sending a test email? If that works, you can request another > > password reset email at [1]. > > > Yes, the address works. No, using the

[aur-general] aurweb 4.1.0 released

Hello, We are pleased to announce that aurweb 4.1.0 has been released. The official aurweb setup [1] has already been updated. Special thanks to Marcel Korpel who, among other things, made various improvements to the package comments interface. You can now edit comments! For a comprehensive

Re: [aur-general] pacapong disappeared

On Fri, 02 Oct 2015 at 21:21:12, Jozef Riha wrote: > hello, > > i am (or was) a maintainer of pacapong. certainly not a state of the art > pkbuild - but it was not completely useless. anyway, the pkgbuild seems to > have been deleted without giving me any notice or explanation. > > $ git status

Re: [aur-general] Request from aur3

On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 at 08:17:08, XavierCLL wrote: > I get it! > > but why this package not show in > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?O=0=insync-dolphin > > the user created the repository but not submitted the package? > [...] Exactly. See FS#46279. [1]

Re: [aur-general] AUR repos and git subtrees

On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 at 21:09:28, Eli Schwartz wrote: [...] So, comparing my subtree split of fanficfare I get a root commit at: 69c3f0eec7fe3ce2983dec09b5dcba5a02d9169c In the AUR, the root commit is: 3c5d51989c6d14feea568ba6627dd9e5e7492f67 git diff them, they're identical trees. The

Re: [aur-general] fbterm-git has an AUR git repo, but it isn't available in the web view?

On Thu, 13 Aug 2015 at 20:07:06, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote: Em 13-08-2015 14:58, ShadowKyogre escreveu: But when I try to visit the corresponding overview page, it says that it's not found. This package was deleted (hidden). If you increase the pkgrel, create a .SRCINFO file and push it,

Re: [aur-general] Deletion of orphaned packages on AUR4

Hi, There seems to be quite some confusion about the package migration process and about package deletion. I would like to clarify my point of view. Hopefully it serves as a basis for discussion (i.e. technical discussion without attacking anybody personally). As already mentioned a couple of

Re: [aur-general] Why can't I search the packages not migrated to AUR4?

On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 at 17:52:55, Iru Cai wrote: Hi, I found some packages original in AUR3 can't be search in AUR4, but actually the package web page is in AUR4. I just removed all package bases that have not been re-uploaded to AUR 4.0.0. Iru Cai

Re: [aur-general] aurweb 4.0.0 released

On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 at 15:14:14, Jakub Klinkovský wrote: [...] As far as I remember, it was discussed that the old packages from AUR3 will still be available in an archive. Is it the aur-mirror.git [4] or something else? We were thinking to replace the currently broken links to AUR packages

[aur-general] aurweb 4.0.0 released

Hello, We are pleased to announce that aurweb 4.0.0 has been released. The official aurweb setup [1] has already been updated. The most exciting change in this release is that Git repositories are now used for AUR packages. This new feature comes along with some other nice additions, such as an

Re: [aur-general] Request to remove a commit on AUR4

On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 at 09:45:46, Ting-Wei Lan wrote: I forgot 'git push --force' was no longer allowed in AUR4. I forgot to include .SRCINFO changes in the last commit, and I can no longer do 'git subtree push' to fix it because the pushed commit was rebased. I cannot use 'git reflog' and

Re: [aur-general] forgot the username for my AUR account

On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 at 15:32:46, Dennis Værum wrote: the account is registered under this mail and I can get a link to reset the accounts password, but I still need the username. Can someone send the username to this mail? If you use the password reset form from the aur4 subdomain [1], your

Re: [aur-general] We've got a spam issue in our AUR

On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 at 17:54:10, Daniel Micay wrote: On 12/07/15 11:24 AM, Andrejs Mivreņiks wrote: Hi, The user instmania[1] has posted spam links in the comments section of almost every recently updated package. For example [2] [1] https://aur4.archlinux.org/account/instmania/

Re: [aur-general] We've got a spam issue in our AUR

On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 at 18:25:47, Andrejs Mivreņiks wrote: Hi, Suspending the account is good, though what about messages? Are they going to be removed? Also there is totally no spam protection that I know of at this moment in AUR, at some point it might turn out to be a bigger problem

Re: [aur-general] AUR4 keywords in PKGBUILD?

On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 at 18:07:37, Ido Rosen wrote: Is it possible currently to set the keywords/tags in the PKGBUILD itself instead of on the website? (Previously, we had to set categories on the AUR website, but that felt suboptimal.) e.g. a keywords=('cats' 'dogs' ...); variable? No.

Re: [aur-general] Merge request braid - braid-hib

On Thu, 09 Jul 2015 at 15:34:07, Sam S. wrote: I uploaded my previous AUR package braid to AUR4 under the new name braid-hib. Can comments and votes be merged please? Please file a merge request using the File Request link from the package actions box.

[aur-general] Adopt orphan packages on AUR 4 now!

Hi, it is July 8th (anywhere on earth) now, so I just disowned all packages that were not uploaded to aur4.archlinux.org yet. Feel free to adopt and resubmit your favorite packages! Regards, Lukas

Re: [aur-general] Cannot log in to AUR, probably due to forgotten username

On Thu, 02 Jul 2015 at 10:28:22, Roey Darwish Dror wrote: Although I just reset my password in AUR I still cannot log in using the new password. IIRC my username is r-darwish, but I might have forgotten it. Replied off-list.

Re: [aur-general] [AURv4] Shallow HTTPS clones do not work

On Mon, 22 Jun 2015 at 21:05:58, Chris Warrick wrote: I’m trying to create a shallow clone of an AURv4 repository with `--depth 1`, but I can’t get it to work. $ git clone https://aur4.archlinux.org/pkgbuilder.git/ Cloning into 'pkgbuilder'... remote: Counting objects: 23, done. remote:

Re: [aur-general] Deleted account on AUR and unable to recreate on AUR4

On Mon, 15 Jun 2015 at 23:37:16, Daniel Sandman wrote: So I fucked up I was going to move over my AUR packages to AUR4. Couldn't log in on AUR4 and I wanted to make a new user anyway. So I deleted my account on on AUR. Now I am unable to recreate it on AUR4 as I use the same email

Re: [aur-general] merging of aur3 comments into aur4

On Sun, 14 Jun 2015 at 13:43:13, Joakim Hernberg wrote: Are there plans to merge comments made on aur3 into aur4 at the end of the transition period? Seems like users still like to leave comments on aur3, and even if not all that important, it might be useful to have them merged when aur4

Re: [aur-general] Multiple maintainers

On Sun, 14 Jun 2015 at 05:55:39, Pablo Lezaeta Reyes wrote: [...] If you go [1] you only see me as maintainer, no mention ahta ther is another maintainer. If is intended that the detals not show maintainer, then you could concider make that maintainers show all the mainainter, so if a problem

Re: [aur-general] Category... and AUR4

On Sat, 13 Jun 2015 at 01:52:31, Pablo Lezaeta Reyes wrote: As discuced countless times, there is a recurrent request to remove Category because is not acurated to the many catoegories that a package could have, is not a translatable part, always there are miscategoriced packages, and so on

Re: [aur-general] Multiple maintainers

On Sat, 13 Jun 2015 at 01:56:37, Pablo Lezaeta Reyes wrote: I try add maandree to comaintain my ponysay-devel-git, I fill the request and press accept but no comaintainer update or message is show and I not see he in the list. Is there a pedior to wait? the co maintainer need to accept the

Re: [aur-general] registration with wrong email

On Sat, 13 Jun 2015 at 19:45:03, respiranto wrote: Hi, Some days ago, I wanted to register an AUR account but unfortunately used the wrong email address (respira...@icloud.de instead of .com). Since the mail with the password has been sent to the wrong email adress (which is probably not

Re: [aur-general] How the Popularity value is being calculated for a package in the AUR4?

On Fri, 12 Jun 2015 at 09:43:00, G. Schlisio wrote: Lukas on aur-dev: Popularity is the sum of all votes with each vote being weighted with a factor of 0.98 per day since its creation. thats quite a fast wear-off, i think. after a year, there is virtually nothing left (6e-4 only). does

Re: [aur-general] AUR4, git, subtrees ELI5?

On Fri, 12 Jun 2015 at 01:42:41, Eli Schwartz wrote: [...] That still requires packagers to go through several new hoops. [...] Which ones? Can't think of any apart from generating the key and adding it to the web interface. It literally takes ~1 minute. You need to do the same thing after

Re: [aur-general] AUR4, git, subtrees ELI5?

On Fri, 12 Jun 2015 at 12:42:30, David Kaylor wrote: On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 5:34 AM, Lukas Fleischer lfleisc...@archlinux.org wrote: [...] It is expected (and intended) that some (hopefully not too many) AUR package maintainers back out due to the new system. It is also intended

Re: [aur-general] [AUR4] Support of multiple ssh public keys

On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 at 21:18:11, Yuki Chiba wrote: Hi, I prefer to use individual ssh public keys on different machines, but I could register only single key in my profile on aur4.archlinux.org. Just out of curiosity: Is there any reason for using different SSH keys per machine (for the

Re: [aur-general] AUR4, git, subtrees ELI5?

On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 at 21:39:52, Florian Bruhin wrote: * Joakim Hernberg jhernb...@alchemy.lu [2015-06-11 21:03:50 +0200]: On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 13:36:54 -0500 Eli Schwartz eschwart...@gmail.com wrote: [...] The suggestion was made that perhaps a tarball upload could be added which would

Re: [aur-general] KeyError(key)

That sounds like a bug to me. Could you please upload your repository somewhere else (e.g. on GitHub) and file a bug report on [1]? Thanks, Lukas [1] https://bugs.archlinux.org/index/proj2

Re: [aur-general] Error submitting to aur4

On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 at 09:01:05, Alexander Görtz wrote: Hi, I lately have adopted an aur package google-authenticator-libpam-git. But if I try to add it to the new aur4 I get: git-receive-pack: permission denied: nylocx fatal: Could not read from remote repository. Please make

Re: [aur-general] Should I request deletion for packages in this transition period?

On Tue, 09 Jun 2015 at 06:25:43, Oon-Ee Ng wrote: I'm only now looking at the AUR4 migration guidelines, and I only have a few packages so I've been uploading to AUR4 manually. However, in the process I've found old packages which I no longer use or wish to maintain. Some of which should may

Re: [aur-general] Error pushing a PKGBUILD with split packages

On Mon, 08 Jun 2015 at 16:48:27, Chris Warrick wrote: [...] Should I litter AURv4 with outdated packages and file requests, or what? Is there really no better way to do this? [...] I noticed that you already fixed this. For everyone else: Note that you do not need to upload a dummy package

Re: [aur-general] [AUR4] View list of orphans

On Mon, 08 Jun 2015 at 16:55:32, G. Schlisio wrote: [...] in AUR4 i tried this as well, but just got a Error retrieving package list.. Searching for maintainer orphan does not work as well. is this a bug, a feature or am i missing something here? [...] Fixed, thanks for reporting!

Re: [aur-general] [AUR4] Error when upload a update pkgbuild : remote: error: missing install file: avidemux.install

On Mon, 08 Jun 2015 at 19:25:02, brent timothy saner wrote: [...] I'm getting the same behaviour: [bts@workhorse freeswitch]$ git push Counting objects: 14, done. Delta compression using up to 8 threads. Compressing objects: 100% (13/13), done. Writing objects: 100% (14/14), 11.60 KiB | 0

[aur-general] aur4.archlinux.org is online

Hi, the AUR 4 setup at aur4.archlinux.org is now live. If you submitted your packages earlier today, please double-check that they are listed on the aur4.archlinux.org web interface. Regards, Lukas

Re: [aur-general] [AUR4] Error when upload a update pkgbuild : remote: error: missing install file: avidemux.install

On Mon, 08 Jun 2015 at 11:22:29, Xorg wrote: I have the same problem with package libreoffice-faenza-mod: remote: error: The following error occurred when parsing commit remote: error: 2b5e403e908f51617b188c49a11def1ae4d9bf27: remote: error: missing install file:

Re: [aur-general] Problem submitting to the new AUR.

On Mon, 08 Jun 2015 at 14:18:23, Joakim Hernberg wrote: I get this trying to commit the linux-rt buildscript? [...] remote: Traceback (most recent call last): remote: File hooks/update, line 253, in module remote: if not fname in commit.tree: remote: TypeError: unexpected dict remote:

Re: [aur-general] AUR4 patchwork package

On Mon, 08 Jun 2015 at 14:53:46, Francesco Colista wrote: Please, remove the patchwork package from aur, since the correct one is patchwork-git. Please file a request using the File Request link in the package actions box. Thanks! Thanks. -- :: Francesco ::

Re: [aur-general] [AUR4] AttributeError: '_pygit2.Tree' object has no attribute 'size'

On Mon, 08 Jun 2015 at 11:12:36, Florian Bruhin wrote: Hi, I just tried to upload my first package, and I get this: remote: Traceback (most recent call last): remote: File hooks/update, line 194, in module remote: if repo[treeobj.id].size 10: remote:

  1   2   3   4   5   >