[aur-general] TU resignation - Lukas Jirkovsky (stativ)

Hello everyone, after much time I've finally came to admit to myself that I can no longer fulfill my duties as a trusted user the way Arch Linux deserves. While I still manage to update the packages I actively use, such as rawtherapee, I can no longer keep up with other packages and updates often

Re: [aur-general] [tu-bylaws] [PATCH] Clarify the process for Special Removal of an inactive TU

On 19 January 2018 at 00:18, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > Not everything that is available only to an aurweb account of the > Trusted User type, qualifies as a TU "privilege" > > Signed-off-by: Eli Schwartz > --- > > Handy link to

Re: [aur-general] Inactivity starting 4th August

On 31 July 2014 23:33, Lukas Jirkovsky l.jirkov...@gmail.com wrote: Hey guys! I will be inactive starting Monday 4th August. I will be moving to a different city for a job (yay, for the first time I'm gong to be paid for programming :-)) and I won't have an Internet connection for some time

Re: [aur-general] Absence of kdelibs3

On 1 August 2014 12:42, Alexander Rødseth rods...@gmail.com wrote: I strongly dislike kdelibs3 and think that all kdelibs3 related packages should be removed from AUR, but that is my personal opinion. I don't think any package should be removed if it works/is maintained. And if somebody wants

Re: [aur-general] Orphan request: i2p and i2p-bin

The standard procedure is to wait at least two weeks. Especially during summer it is possible that the maintainer is on vacation On 2 August 2014 14:06, Andrey Mivrenik g...@fastmail.fm wrote: Hello! i2p has some important security-related updates, although AUR package is not being updated for

[aur-general] Inactivity starting 4th August

Hey guys! I will be inactive starting Monday 4th August. I will be moving to a different city for a job (yay, for the first time I'm gong to be paid for programming :-)) and I won't have an Internet connection for some time except from the mobile phone. Anyway, from the packaging side most of my

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Req] ethereum-serpent-git

On 11 July 2014 17:32, Andy Weidenbaum archb...@gmail.com wrote: This package no longer exists upstream. Please remove from AUR. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ethereum-serpent-git Removed, next time please use the functionality provided by AUR.

Re: [aur-general] AUR 3.3.0 released

On 9 July 2014 15:01, Dave Reisner d...@falconindy.com wrote: Naming is important. Here's an idea: lets call them comments. They can be freeform text so that you can explain why the package needs attention, rather than just pressing some weirdly labeled button and hoping the maintainer

Re: [aur-general] AUR 3.3.0 released

On 9 July 2014 15:08, Evert Vorster evors...@gmail.com wrote: Naming is important. Here's an idea: lets call them comments. They can be freeform text so that you can explain why the package needs attention, rather than just pressing some weirdly labeled button and hoping the maintainer figures

Re: [aur-general] AUR 3.3.0 released

On 9 July 2014 21:40, Jonathan Arnold jdarn...@buddydog.org wrote: And if the email bounces, the package should be automagically disowned. Not a good idea, if there was a temporary problem with a mailserver it would result in unsolicited orphaning of packages.

Re: [aur-general] deletion request mingw-w64-getrusage

On 1 July 2014 14:17, xantares 09 xantare...@hotmail.com wrote: Hello, Could someone delete mingw-w64-getrusage: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw-w64-getrusage/ I've renamed it to mingw-w64-resource. Regards, xan. Removed

Re: [aur-general] Please delete dwm-sprinkles-svn-experimental

On 18 June 2014 13:29, Runiq ru...@archlinux.us wrote: On 18.06.2014 12:49:26, Runiq wrote: See subject line, the package is here [1]. The upstream SVN branch doesn't exist anymore, and development has moved to Github [2]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dwm-sprinkles-svn-experimental

Re: [aur-general] Merge request: bitscope-dev - bitscope-dso

On 18 June 2014 17:17, Ente ducksou...@duckpond.ch wrote: Hello please merge the packet: bitscope-dev https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bitscope-dev/ into: bitscope-dso https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bitscope-dso/ the resulting packet should be: bitscope-dso

Re: [aur-general] PKGBUILD removal request

On 19 June 2014 15:38, sinma eichi...@mailoo.org wrote: Oups sorry, it’s hunspell-fr-cpr90-base (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hunspell-fr-cpr90-base). -- mon site web: hack-libre.org Deleted

Re: [aur-general] Remove/Merge request

On 19 June 2014 15:21, Armin K. kre...@email.com wrote: Hello, Please remove clang-svn [1] package or merge it into llvm-svn [2] because I will shortly upload a split pkgbuild for llvm-svn that also builds clang-svn. I maintain both of them. Thanks. [1]

Re: [aur-general] Merge requesrt: hdf5-wfortran and hdf5-fortran-cxx

On 15 June 2014 22:05, Quan Guo guots...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'm the maintainer of the package hdf5-fortran-cxx[1]. Another package hdf5-wfortran[2] which is the same to the package hdf5-fortran-cxx now is orphaned and out-of-date. Since there are two packages are doing the same thing, I

Re: [aur-general] Remove duplicate package babe

Merged, thx.

Re: [aur-general] delete mingw-w64-libpng-static

On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 10:23 PM, Никола Вукосављевић hau...@gmx.com wrote: Well, I guess it should be deleted then. Merged

Re: [aur-general] [Merge Request] mikachan-font‏

On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 3:54 AM, d...@orum.in wrote: Someone please merge https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mikachanfont into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ttf-mikachan the package use $startdir and wrong package name Regards Merged, thx.

Re: [aur-general] Duplicated package removal request

On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 2:34 AM, Jeremy Audet ichimonj...@gmail.com wrote: Correction: hashdeep was merged into md5deep. (Hashdeep doesn't exist anymore, so I think that's what you meant to say?) Yep, you are right.

Re: [aur-general] Duplicated package removal request

On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 1:33 AM, Steven Honeyman stevenhoney...@gmail.com wrote: I've just noticed that the md5deep [1] package (kept up-to-date, first submitted in 2006) someone has duplicated to hashdeep [2] in 2014. They compile from exactly the same source, and produce the same binaries.

Re: [aur-general] Delete requests for obsolete XWayland packages

On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 9:47 PM, Tim Jester-Pfadt t...@gmx.de wrote: Hi, I think there might be a confusion regarding package [6]. For our regular desktops we need the XOrg server which comes as a binary in /usr/bin/Xorg provided by the xorg-server package in [extra]. You get this by

Re: [aur-general] ttf-droid-sans duplicate of community/ttf-droid?

On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 11:47 PM, Bartłomiej Piotrowski b...@bpiotrowski.pl wrote: This way we should also split ttf-bitstream-vera, ttf-dejavu, ttf-freefont, ttf-liberation and ttf-ubuntu-family. Why limit ourselves to only normal, condensed and so on? Let's split bold and monoscape variants

Re: [aur-general] Upload package blacklist, maybe upcoming merge request

On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 6:24 PM, Stefan Husmann stefan-husm...@t-online.de wrote: Hello, I think that the package openjade1.3 [1] in AUR is badly named, and so wanted to upload an openjade PKGBUILD. But doing so burp (from git) told me this: error: failed to upload

Re: [aur-general] Delete requests for obsolete XWayland packages

On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Tim Jester-Pfadt t...@gmx.de wrote: Hello, now that XWayland changed to being it's own server binary, rather than a module for X11, there are several obsolete drivers on the AUR which only create confusion.[1][2][3] The new XWayland doesn't need patched

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: eclectus

On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 9:00 PM, Rémy Marquis remy.marq...@gmail.com wrote: I am the maintainer of the eclectus package. This software stopped working a long time ago, due to change of a dependency break. No upstream activity for about 4 years, and it seems this software won't be updated by

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: quark

On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Aaron DeVore aaron.dev...@gmail.com wrote: I am the maintainer of the quark package. I can't get it to compile, there hasn't been an additional vote in years, and no upstream activity in almost 4 years. Please delete. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/quark/

Re: [aur-general] Remove gconf-thread

Removed, thx. On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Hector Martinez-Seara hse...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, please remove gconf-thread. It was patched to be able to run banshee but new banshee version does not require the patch. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gconf-thread/ Hector

Re: [aur-general] Merge request: pipe and pipe2

On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Thiago Barroso Perrotta thiagoperrott...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I just updated the pipe [1] PKGBUILD. There is also pipe2 [2], which is the same program, but outdated (last updated in 2012). The best thing here would be to merge them into 'pipe2'. [1]:

Re: [aur-general] [Disownment request]

On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 10:49 PM, Berno Strik dutchma...@gmx.com wrote: By joining I mean that I combine the cupswrapper and lpr packages into one new package. You can see examples of that if you look at the brother-packages owned by libernux Can you upload the new packages? I will happily

Re: [aur-general] [Merge request] brother-mfc-7460dn

I've contacted the maintainer but he did not respond (see email below). Can you please continue with the merge. OK, merged. Thanks for cleaning this up!

Re: [aur-general] [Disownment request]

On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:00 AM, Berno Strik dutchma...@gmx.com wrote: Can you please merge, [1] and [2] into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-hl5250dn [3] and [4] into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-mfc-490cw [5] and [6] into

Re: [aur-general] Delete ttf-formata

There's no problem for providing PKGBUILD in AUR as long as it does not download from an illegal source or otherwise advertise illegal activity. You can always create a PKGBUILD that states only the file name in the source array and which requires users to manually download the file. There are

Re: [aur-general] remove python-keyczar (Python 2 only)

On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Johannes Dewender a...@jonnyjd.net wrote: Hello, please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-keyczar/ This name always was a Python 2 package and is available since 2012 here: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-keyczar I checked,

Re: [aur-general] Merge request livescript to nodejs-livescript

On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Lance Chen cyen0...@gmail.com wrote: Hello TUs, Please merge livescript into nodejs-livescript, since the latter one make it clearer that it is a nodejs package. Thank you very much. livescript: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/livescript/

Re: [aur-general] [Package renaming] firefox-extension-add-to-search-bar

On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 10:41 AM, chdorb chd...@gmail.com wrote: I've uploaded firefox-extension-add-to-search-bar, please merge it with firefox-add-to-search-bar and then delete the old one. Merged. Please provide links next time.

[aur-general] April Fools' Day jokes in AUR

I feel that this PKGBUILD needs to be preserved for future generations after it has been deleted from AUR: pkgname=secure-certificates pkgver=0 pkgrel=0 pkgdesc=Trust no one arch=(any) license=('WTFPL') url=('https://127.0.0.1') conflicts=('ca-certificates') provides=('ca-certificates') build()

Re: [aur-general] A bit strange - unusual packages

CCed to the maintainer of these packages. lib32- prefix is used for the 32bit packages that are meant to be used with 64bit Arch, ie. with arch=('x86_64'). However, all your lib32-distrho-* packages are arch=('i686'). You should provide only one package that is arch=('x86_64' 'i686') for this.

Re: [aur-general] Disown request: velox and velox-git

On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 8:08 AM, Brian F. G. Bidulock bidul...@openss7.org wrote: Please disown velox and velox-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/velox/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/velox-git/ so that they may be property maintained. -- brian Disowned, Cinelli still hasn't

Re: [aur-general] Orphan request: waimea

On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 2:48 AM, Brian F. G. Bidulock bidul...@openss7.org wrote: Please disown https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/waimea = not updated in 7 years = no response emails to maintainer in last 6 months = I have updated PKGBUILD ready to go --brian Disowned.

Re: [aur-general] Disown request: velox and velox-git

On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 2:50 AM, Brian F. G. Bidulock bidul...@openss7.org wrote: On Thu, 13 Mar 2014, Brian F. G. Bidulock wrote: Please disown https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/velox and https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/velox-git = not updated in over a year = no response to

Re: [aur-general] Delete package from the AUR

On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 12:25 PM, James Bulmer neki...@gmail.com wrote: Morning, I was a bit of a twerp and mistyped the name of a package, with this in mind could python2-oslo-rootwtaphttps://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-oslo-rootwtap/ be removed. Thanks Removed.

Re: [aur-general] merge request - you-get-git

On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 2:48 PM, lilydjwg lilyd...@gmail.com wrote: Please merge python-you-get-git[1] into you-get-git[2] as it's used primarily as a tool, not as a library. [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-you-get-git/ [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/you-get-git/ --

Re: [aur-general] Request for replacing canon-ufr to cndrvcups-lb-bin

On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 8:06 PM, Rob Til Freedmen rob.til.freed...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Evgeniy Alekseev darkarca...@mail.ru wrote: On Saturday 01 March 2014 12:41:27 Allen Choong wrote: I am the maintainer of canon-ufr and cndrvcups-lb-bin. As discussion with

Re: [aur-general] Using old package name for new software

On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Fabien Dubosson fabien.dubos...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I just discovered a tool called `q` [1] and I have done a PKGBUILD to try it. As it can be a useful to someone else, I was going to push it to AUR. But there exists already a package called `q` [2]

Re: [aur-general] Deletion Request: antichamber-hib

On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 4:17 PM, moebius...@gmail.com wrote: Hey, I'm the maintainer of the 'antichamber' package. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/antichamber/ Another guy made a duplicate called 'antichamber-hib'. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/antichamber-hib/ They both have

Re: [aur-general] Dropping laptop-mode-tools to AUR

On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Lukas Jirkovsky l.jirkov...@gmail.com wrote: I'm not using laptop-mode-tools for a long time now and recently I've got two bug reports that I don't really want to bother fixing (they are upstream problems). If nobody steps up to maintaining this package

[aur-general] Dropping laptop-mode-tools to AUR

I'm not using laptop-mode-tools for a long time now and recently I've got two bug reports that I don't really want to bother fixing (they are upstream problems). If nobody steps up to maintaining this package by the next Friday, I will drop it to AUR. Lukas

Re: [aur-general] Orphan request

On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Anton Larionov diffident@gmail.com wrote: Hello, Could you please orphan 'ttaenc' package? It's broken for a long time and maintainer seems to be inactive. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ttaenc/ Orphaned. The maintainer has been inactive for three

Re: [aur-general] Can we force the maintainer to change package name?

On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Rashif Ray Rahman sc...@archlinux.org wrote: Since there was no 'rstudio' at the time that user uploaded this one, there is no infringement of any rule or guideline per se. Just tell them to upload an 'r-studio' to mitigate the confusion that resulted from it.

Re: [aur-general] Changes in Arch packaging standards

On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Sergej Pupykin m...@sergej.pp.ru wrote: Hi, Bartłomiej Piotrowski proposed packaging standard changes: if there are 2 versions of some package foobar, then older version (1.0 for example) must be named as foobar1-1.0 and newer version (2.0 for example) must

Re: [aur-general] Another couple to delete...

On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 3:53 AM, Curtis Shimamoto sugar.and.scru...@gmail.com wrote: This is a module that is meant for Realtek RTS5229 Pcie SDCard readers. The functionality was mainlined around 3.8 with the rtsx-pci module (I know because my machine uses this).

Re: [aur-general] Delete request: bison27

On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 7:45 AM, Rob McCathie korr...@gmail.com wrote: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bison27/ I made this package because wine-stable 1.6 didn't work with newer releases of bison. Wine 1.6.1 was just released with this issue resolved and I have already updated

Re: [aur-general] Delete request

On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Lara Maia l...@craft.net.br wrote: Delete wine-rawinput [1]. rawinput patch already in main version of wine: http://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git/commit/c6fcc0255c3e7a655b157d1e68e5c80fe328bdf2 [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wine-rawinput/ -- *~

Re: [aur-general] Merge grub-gfx into grub-legacy

On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Keshav Padram Amburay the.ridikulus@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Please merge grub-gfx [1] into grub-legacy [2] as the former is just one patch on top of latter, and grub-gfx has been orphaned while grub-legacy seems to be actively maintained. Please note

Re: [aur-general] Merge request for [sqlmap].

On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Evan Teitelman teitelmane...@gmail.com wrote: Please merge sqlmap[1] into sqlmap-git[2]. I contacted the sqlmap-git maintainer, who agreed to a merge. The sqlmap sourceforge upstream is considered deprecated and the tarball releases are out-dated. The latest

Re: [aur-general] Merge request: pulseaudio_ctl -- pulseaudio-ctl

On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 1:11 AM, member graysky gray...@archlinux.us wrote: Based on the Scrimma's advice[1], I would like to request a TU to please merge my old package into my new package thus retaining the comments/votes. Old package: pulseaudio_ctl New package: pulseaudio-ctl Thank you

Re: [aur-general] kfaenza-icon-theme disown

On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Daniele Formichelli daniele.formiche...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I would like to disown package kfaenza-icon-them from maintainer JokerBoy. He has not responded to comments on the AUR page ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kfaenza-icon-theme/) and it doesn't

Re: [aur-general] Merge request: qputusb

On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 6:00 PM, lukas.gra...@web.de wrote: Hi, I am now the owner of putusb and it includes qputusb. Could you delete the obsolete qputusb from the aur to merge it with putusb. Thanks lks Merged, thanks.

Re: [aur-general] Trusted User Application

After quickly skimming through your PKGBUILDs I must say I like them, they are nice and clean. Bonus points for quickly fixing the return 1 issue. Lukas

Re: [aur-general] Removal requests: dkms-rt8192cu

On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Jakub Klinkovský kuba.klinkov...@gmail.com wrote: On 16.08.13 at 14:17, N30N wrote: Hi, This package has become dated and I would like it be removed: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dkms-rt8192cu/ Thanks and best regards, N30N. I can see that rtl8192cu

Re: [aur-general] RFC: freecad-git

On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote: Hi, Would anyone care to comment on this PKGBUILD? AUR: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fr/freecad-git/PKGBUILD Pastebin copy: http://pastebin.com/q3ARNgJ6 Is this an acceptable clever workaround or an abomination that

Re: [aur-general] RFC: freecad-git

On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Dave Reisner d...@falconindy.com wrote: But not needed here. If oce and oce-git provide=(opencascade), freecad-git could simply depends=(opencascade). Good point, I thought oce and opencascade are two completely different projects. However, after more careful

Re: [aur-general] Delete requests

On 31 August 2013 17:13, Julien Nicoulaud julien.nicoul...@gmail.com wrote: Can you please revert python2-requests-0.14https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-requests-0.14/ back to its original state ? Regards, Julien You should still be able to download tarball directly from:

Re: [aur-general] Delete request

On 31 August 2013 17:11, Julien Nicoulaud julien.nicoul...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Please delete freerdp-awakecoding-git - upstream fork has been merged into freerdp. Regards, Julien Removed, thanks. Please provide link next time. Lukas

Re: [aur-general] Merge request

On 30 August 2013 00:40, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera h...@osvaldobarrera.com.ar wrote: Please merge python-shiboken into shiboken. The shiboken package is older and shiboken is an application, not a library, so it as the proper naming scheme. Both packages provide the same software, and there are no

Re: [aur-general] Deletion and merge requests (long list)

On 27 August 2013 17:53, Lex Black autumn-w...@web.de wrote: Am 26.08.2013 20:10, schrieb Connor Behan: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hawaii-login-manager-git/ Merged with something else https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sddm-devel/g3kGNWI0A3A Not sure about this. Some people might

Re: [aur-general] Request name change/orphaing of drawterm

On 24 August 2013 02:41, Marshall Conover marzhal...@gmail.com wrote: I have uploaded a new package, drawterm-hg[2], which (as far as I can tell) meets the criteria for a package on the AUR, and fixes the issues with the old drawterm package (which also used mercurial, but didn't have it in the

Re: [aur-general] Different PKGBUILD

On 17 August 2013 09:11, podhorsky.ksj podhorsky@gmail.com wrote: Please look at my package avidemux-2.6. Today I updated it. When I try View PKGBUILD action it gives me old package. When I download tarball it gives me new package. Where is problem? Thanks It's likely that the old

Re: [aur-general] Remove psi-plus-recources-git

On 15 August 2013 11:49, Alexey D. lq07829ic...@rambler.ru wrote: Hello. May you remove psi-plus-recourCes-git please? Removed. Please post a link to the package next time. Lukas

Re: [aur-general] [tu-bylaws][PATCH]

On 9 August 2013 13:29, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote: Hi, Here's a patch for the TU-bylaws that resulted from discussion in the previous thread: I can't obviously comment on grammar as I'm not a native speaker, so I have just a single comment. I think it may be better to split this into two

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request

On 9 August 2013 19:33, Quan Guo guots...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Lukas, I have updated the eminent-git package as instructed. Thanks Best Quan Hello Quan, thank you for your cooperation, I just merged them. Lukas

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request

On 8 August 2013 22:18, Quan Guo guots...@gmail.com wrote: Dear Lukas, I'm very glad that I can help manager the eminent-git in any possible way. I just subscribed to the aur-general maillist and I will participate further discussion there. Hello Quan, the eminent-git package is currently an

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request

On 27 July 2013 14:17, Emil Lundberg lundberg.e...@gmail.com wrote: There's no problem, I just thought I'd suggest deletion of an orphaned, out-of-date package [1] since there is another package (eminent-awesome-3.5-git [2]) that provides the same functionality, has a maintainer and is up to

Re: [aur-general] Remove lib32-catalyst-test-utils

On 6 August 2013 15:32, Jameson imntr...@gmail.com wrote: Please, remove lib32-catalyst-test-utils. I've created lib32-catalyst-utils-test in order to match the naming scheme of the 64-bit version. Thanks, =-Jameson Merged. Please provide links next time. Thx, Lukas

Re: [aur-general] Please rename vodafone-mccd to v-mobile-broadband

On 4 August 2013 10:21, Jonas Heinrich o...@project-insanity.org wrote: Thank you for your replay. Here the package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/v-mobile-broadband/ Please merge, thanks Merged, thx.

Re: [aur-general] packages without category

On 30 July 2013 19:56, Rob Til Freedmen rob.til.freed...@gmail.com wrote: There are still 1000 packages without 'Category' - apparently not a hot topic. I think most of these packages are created by uploading the PKGBUILD using burp or a similar AUR uploader. If the categories were to stay [1],

Re: [aur-general] About orphaning all packages of inactive users

On 19 July 2013 20:40, Anatol Pomozov anatol.pomo...@gmail.com wrote: Hi And that is what email notifications for. They are good when someone flags our package out of date. But after that it is easy to forget about it. I don't think that *manual* mass orphaning is a good idea. There should

Re: [aur-general] About orphaning all packages of inactive users

On 18 July 2013 23:24, Alexander Rødseth rods...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, The two packages that are out of date has not been updated for three years. My plan is to orphan all his packages if nobody thinks that's a horribly bad idea. I'm also interested in comments about what should be done for

Re: [aur-general] About orphaning all packages of inactive users

On 19 July 2013 15:39, Anatol Pomozov anatol.pomo...@gmail.com wrote: Hi In this case the maintainer should unmark the package and clearly explain in comments why the package cannot be upgraded to the new version. Ideally maintainer should also work with upstream on resolving the issues. But

Re: [aur-general] Merge/Remove Request : libkqueue

On 5 July 2013 20:22, SJ_UnderWater webmaster0...@rcn.com wrote: I once tried to contact niQo about these Apple-sourced packages, but created my -0 variants to better conform to the standards so they could at least see what I was talking about; I also respond to flags pretty quickly. I

Re: [aur-general] Merge request: gtk-theme-win7-8

On 4 July 2013 11:57, podhorsky.ksj podhorsky@gmail.com wrote: Please merge https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-theme-win7-8/ in https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-theme-win78/ Thanks Merged

Re: [aur-general] Package Merging Request.

On 29 June 2013 16:47, Jagmjp Janpgm darkelfdarkelf...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: Could orion-gtk-theme be merged into gtk-theme-orion please? Merged, thank you. On 29 June 2013 16:58, Diego Principe cdprinc...@gmail.com wrote: Grumpy cat is coming... read here

Re: [aur-general] Merge request

On 28 June 2013 15:21, Maxime Gauduin aluc...@gmail.com wrote: Same for all these, deleted, please contact the current maintainers. BTW, this is not in any guideline, this is just common sense that you should contact them instead of asking for their packages to be transferred to you behind

Re: [aur-general] Rename Request

On 26 June 2013 17:41, Edoardo Maria Elidoro edoardo.elid...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry, here's the new package with the right name: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfwm-theme-axis/ The old one: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfce4-theme-axis/ Done

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

On 26 June 2013 15:20, Edoardo Maria Elidoro edoardo.elid...@gmail.com wrote: Hi everyone, this project seems dead (maybe replaced by tumbler), there's no source upstream and it's orphaned on AUR. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/thunar-audio-thumbnailer/ Removed. This package needs to be

Re: [aur-general] Removal Request: eGTK

On 24 June 2013 10:51, Edoardo Maria Elidoro edoardo.elid...@gmail.com wrote: Hi eveyone, elementary-gtk-theme[0] on AUR has many, many, many problems with Archlinux's GTK2 and GTK3 packages. I think that upstream they did not added the support for GTK 3.6 or 3.8. Should we keep it? Have a

Re: [aur-general] Package removal request

On 27 June 2013 10:36, Francisco Pina Martins f.pinamart...@gmail.com wrote: I own a package in AUR called hardware-monitor (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hardware-monitor/). It no longer serves any purpose I know of since panel applets have been deprecated, the package no longer builds

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

On 27 June 2013 20:40, Edoardo Maria Elidoro edoardo.elid...@gmail.com wrote: 2013/6/27 Lukas Jirkovsky l.jirkov...@gmail.com: Can you please upload the packages under a proper name? I can merge them afterwards. Here's the new packages: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfce4-remmina-plugin

Re: [aur-general] disown request: storebackup

On 15 June 2013 15:12, Jens Nazarenus j...@0x6a.de wrote: I sent a message (at 2013-06-05) to the maintainer of the package storebackup[1] and asked him to update the PKGBUILD. The latest version of storebackup: 3.3.1 PKGBUILD version: 3.2 The latest comment at 2012-11-09 to update the

Re: [aur-general] Requeste merge: bdsup2subplusplus-git into bdsup2subpp-git

On 9 May 2013 04:37, SpinFlo sl1pk...@gmail.com wrote: please merge https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bdsup2subplusplus-git into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bdsup2subpp-git this last have better name greetings Done

Re: [aur-general] Request removal of package

On 9 May 2013 07:14, Antonio Orefice aorefic...@gmail.com wrote: This one is to request removal of package i disowned: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/cairo-nvidiablob/ Meantime, another similar package has emerged, it is cairo-nvidia, so now there is a dupe. Could you please remove the

Re: [aur-general] Request to orphan simon

On 1 May 2013 14:53, Jy Yaworski j...@dervormund.info wrote: Hello: simon [1] has been at version 0.4 for some time, and has been flagged as such since 2012-12-30. The maintainer doesn't seem to be responsive to comments, and an orphan request has been in the comments since 2013-03-01. Could

Re: [aur-general] Merge and removal requests

On 1 May 2013 00:08, Lex Black autumn-w...@web.de wrote: Hi I skipped through orphaned, ood -git PKGBuilds and found some that can be merged or deleted: xbmc-skin-alaska-git: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xbmc-skin-alaska-git/ Source changed to svn Removed tmw-git:

Re: [aur-general] Request to delete jack-git

On 1 May 2013 17:18, Joakim Hernberg j...@alchemy.lu wrote: Please delete jack-git, as I've replaced it with jack1-git -- Joakim Done

Re: [aur-general] request remove avidemux-2.6-gui

On 1 May 2013 18:15, SpinFlo sl1pk...@gmail.com wrote: hello, please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/avidemux-2.6-gui/ for a confusion with handle .AURINFO, upload these package greetings Done

Re: [aur-general] Request to delete lib32-jack-git

On 1 May 2013 17:48, Joakim Hernberg j...@alchemy.lu wrote: Please delete lib32-jack-git, as I've replaced it with lib32-jack1-git -- Joakim Done. Please provide link next time.

Re: [aur-general] Delete and Merge requests

All done, thanks. Lukas

Re: [aur-general] packages removal

On 11 April 2013 15:07, vincent bu...@vinvin.dyndns.org wrote: Hi, packages eos-movrec [1] and open-phd-guiding [2] have been replaced by their counterparts with name ending in -svn [3,4] to follow VCS PKGBUILD guidelines. Please remove these old package versions. Respectfully, vinvin

Re: [aur-general] ssd deletion request

On 29 March 2013 12:37, Stefan Husmann stefan-husm...@t-online.de wrote: Hello, please delete my package ssd https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages/ssd/https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ssd/ I replaced it by a package named sawfish-session-dialog.

  1   2   >