*-{git|hg|svn} and perform actual update of
local copy of sources
(even if PKGBUILD has not been updated)
or users have to accept the fact they play with cutting-edge version of software
so they take care of updates it on their own.
Stop AUR insanity!
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http
/smartgit
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
/python2-openpyxl
So, both Python versions are covered and there is no need
for customised versions.
Shall we remove python-openpyxl-hjunes as no longer needed?
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
On 26 March 2013 08:21, Ike Devolder ike.devol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 09:52:40PM +, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
I can't find anything in the AUR guidelines article about
recommended naming convention for packages.
Apart, from the brief paragraph here
https
or even 11.
FYI, I haven't talked to the maintainers of those packages to avoid
generating noise.
First, I'd like to learn what are recommended options to handle such
split packages
of virtually the same software.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
On 25 March 2013 20:16, Ike Devolder ike.devol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 11:08:07AM +, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
There are two sets of very similar packages for Oracle InstantClient
1) dedicated for version 11.2.0.3.0
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/oracle-instantclient
software
they provide:
https://github.com/defunkt/gist - gist and gist-git
https://github.com/ConradIrwin/jist - jist and jist-git
https://github.com/mattikus/pygist - pygist and pygist-git
Their implementation language is displayed in dependencies.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http
On 23 March 2013 06:34, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote:
On 2013-03-22 20:52 + Mateusz Loskot wrote:
I have submitted hubflow-git package:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hubflow-git/
I'd appreciate any comments and reviews.
This package relies on fix in added to hubflow after my bug
/index.php/PKGBUILD
[3]https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_Packaging_Standards
Yes, I do read those guides and try to follow, though the art of packaging
is not single step process :)
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
for current released
version, (s)he may need to patch it manually.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
On 21 March 2013 20:56, Daniel Wallace danielwall...@gtmanfred.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 08:49:40PM +, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
Hi,
I wonder, would it be possible to request merging these two packages?
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/git-flow-git/
https://aur.archlinux.org
, similar structure.
I'm looking for comments, does it look OK and ready for AUR submission?
[1] http://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/downloads/build_types.html
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/eclipse-integration/
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
PKGBUILD
On 27 October 2012 12:41, Stefan Husmann stefan-husm...@t-online.de wrote:
Am 27.10.2012 01:40, schrieb Mateusz Loskot:
On 27 October 2012 00:36, Dave Reisner d...@falconindy.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 12:34:33AM +0100, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
Is it my local problem or https
On 27 October 2012 13:12, Florian Pritz bluew...@xinu.at wrote:
On 27.10.2012 14:04, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-dev/2012-October/002220.html
Yes, that's very helpful note.
I honestly wonder, why this motion hasn't been
announced in https
with the new
setup, please let us know. Thanks to Ionut and Pierre who helped me with
migrating to the new server.
Folks, thanks for your great work!
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
Hi,
Is it my local problem or https://aur.archlinux.org is offline now?
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
On 27 October 2012 00:36, Dave Reisner d...@falconindy.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 12:34:33AM +0100, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
Is it my local problem or https://aur.archlinux.org is offline now?
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=151509
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id
regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
Hi,
The package can be removed, as explained in the comment:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56948
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55712
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34264
[3] http://apps.corel.com/lp/aftershot/download/index.html
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
On 12 July 2012 21:17, Evangelos Foutras evange...@foutrelis.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 11:08 PM, Mateusz Loskot mate...@loskot.net wrote:
I'm running current Arch 64-bit and I'm trying to install the AfterShot Pro
[0]
using aftershotpro 1.0.1.10-1 [1]
First obstacle
On 20 June 2012 07:36, Ike Devolder ike.devol...@gmail.com wrote:
Op dinsdag 19 juni 2012 23:08:13 schreef Mateusz Loskot:
Hi,
I have just uploaded first release of colormake-git package:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=60182
I'm hoping it is in good shape.
Also, currently
released a while ago:
http://bre.klaki.net/programs/colormake/
Shall I try to refresh it to colormake 0.9?
BTW, there is no sign of colormake in official repositories:
www.archlinux.org/packages/?sort=q=colormake
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
On 16 June 2012 07:56, Kwpolska kwpol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 12:52 AM, Mateusz Loskot mate...@loskot.net wrote:
I have created first version of proj-svn package for PROJ.4, a cartographic
projections library hosted at http://proj.osgeo.org
I attached two files, PKGBUILD
On 16 June 2012 14:19, Kwpolska kwpol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Mateusz Loskot mate...@loskot.net wrote:
On 16 June 2012 07:56, Kwpolska kwpol...@gmail.com wrote:
* ${srcdir}, ${pkgdir}
I'm not sure I understand.
Should I remove all uses of these variables?
I
regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
' logs, why nobody bothers
naming them .ChangeLog?
Is the wiki out of date here, or the policy is relaxed?
[1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Creating_Packages
[2] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_User_Repository#Git_Repo
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
On 15 June 2012 21:17, Mateusz Loskot mate...@loskot.net wrote:
Apart from the mandatory .PKGINFO file
I've just realised, this file is named .PKGINFO whereas all packages
use PKGBUILD.
Hmm, what am I missing here?
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
On 15 June 2012 23:23, Jesse Juhani Jaara jesse.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
pe, 2012-06-15 kello 23:14 +0100, Mateusz Loskot kirjoitti:
I've just realised, this file is named .PKGINFO whereas all packages
use PKGBUILD.
PKGBUILD is the file that makepkg reads and builds the package according
On 15 June 2012 23:32, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 16/06/12 08:14, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
On 15 June 2012 21:17, Mateusz Loskot mate...@loskot.net wrote:
Apart from the mandatory .PKGINFO file
I've just realised, this file is named .PKGINFO whereas all packages
use PKGBUILD
://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21666
Homepage: http://home.comcast.net/~gevenden56/proj/
Historically, it is related to PROJ.4, names are similar, but they are
distinct projects.
So, proj-svn is not a duplicate of any existing package.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
-svn suffix for the latter?
I have checked the Wiki of ABS, Package Development category, etc.
and I haven't found answer to my questions. Any pointers?
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
On 15 June 2012 01:49, Sven-Hendrik Haase s...@lutzhaase.com wrote:
On 06/15/2012 02:45 AM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
(I'm not sure if this post belongs here or perhaps to aur-dev, sorry
for confusion.)
Is there any convention regarding structure and naming of packages?
I have a project
33 matches
Mail list logo
