[aur-general] Package deletion request

2014-12-28 Thread foalsrock
Hi, I'd like the removal of two freshly uploaded packages. I've uploaded them without much testing (shame on me) and they now unnecessarily conflict. python-bidi: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-bidi/ python2-bidi: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-bidi/ Thanks

Re: [aur-general] Package deletion request

2014-12-28 Thread Ralf Mardorf
Hi :) On Sun, 28 Dec 2014 12:55:46 +0200, foalsrock wrote: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-bidi/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-bidi/ Click the links, then log in. At the right side is an Package Actions box. Click File Request. Request type: Deletion is the default.

[aur-general] Package deletion request

2014-12-22 Thread Mike Dacre
Hi All, I maintain qguiconnect at https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qguiconnect/ It has been superseded by qconnect, so could you please delete qguiconnect? Thanks, Mike

Re: [aur-general] Package deletion request

2014-12-22 Thread Daniel Wallace
You can make the delete request through the aur interface on that packages page. Check the file request link. Sent from my iPhone On Dec 22, 2014, at 11:45 PM, Mike Dacre mike.da...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, I maintain qguiconnect at https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qguiconnect/ It

Re: [aur-general] Package deletion request for sublime-text-beta

2014-08-17 Thread Jelle van der Waa
On 08/17/14 at 07:32am, Evangelos Foutras wrote: On 17 August 2014 06:25, Ronald Kinard furyhunter...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I accidentally uploaded a package which is an effective duplicate of sublime-text-dev, named sublime-text-beta. I'm requesting that my package sublime-text-beta

[aur-general] Package deletion request for sublime-text-beta

2014-08-16 Thread Ronald Kinard
Hello, I accidentally uploaded a package which is an effective duplicate of sublime-text-dev, named sublime-text-beta. I'm requesting that my package sublime-text-beta be deleted. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sublime-text-beta/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sublime-text-dev/ Thanks

Re: [aur-general] Package deletion request for sublime-text-beta

2014-08-16 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On 17 August 2014 06:25, Ronald Kinard furyhunter...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I accidentally uploaded a package which is an effective duplicate of sublime-text-dev, named sublime-text-beta. I'm requesting that my package sublime-text-beta be deleted.

Re: [aur-general] Package deletion request for sublime-text-beta

2014-08-16 Thread Taylor Lookabaugh
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 10:25 PM, Ronald Kinard furyhunter...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I accidentally uploaded a package which is an effective duplicate of sublime-text-dev, named sublime-text-beta. I'm requesting that my package sublime-text-beta be deleted.

Re: [aur-general] package deletion request

2014-06-07 Thread Felix Yan
On Friday, June 06, 2014 12:32:13 Schala Zeal wrote: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw-w64-zlib-static/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw-w64-winpthreads-static/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw-w64-wxmsw2.9/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw-w64-wxmsw2.9-static/

[aur-general] package deletion request

2014-06-06 Thread Schala Zeal
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw-w64-zlib-static/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw-w64-winpthreads-static/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw-w64-wxmsw2.9/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw-w64-wxmsw2.9-static/

[aur-general] package deletion request my-little-investigation

2014-04-12 Thread Matthias Devlamynck
Hi, I've created a package named my-little-investigation and some time after noticed that the project is named my-little-investigations with an s. My bad. So anyone can delete this package to avoid the duplicate ? https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/my-little-investigation/ With thanks,

Re: [aur-general] package deletion request my-little-investigation

2014-04-12 Thread Felix Yan
On Sunday, April 13, 2014 01:35:06 Matthias Devlamynck wrote: Hi, I've created a package named my-little-investigation and some time after noticed that the project is named my-little-investigations with an s. My bad. So anyone can delete this package to avoid the duplicate ?

[aur-general] Package deletion request

2014-02-09 Thread Joseph Carta
Hi. I've just claimed ownership to and updated the previously orphaned package extract-xiso [1]. Since the author of this program incorporated the somski mod into it, the package extract-xiso-somski [2] has been made redundant and should be deleted. [1]

Re: [aur-general] Package deletion request

2014-02-09 Thread Xyne
On 2014-02-09 03:35 -0500 Joseph Carta wrote: Hi. I've just claimed ownership to and updated the previously orphaned package extract-xiso [1]. Since the author of this program incorporated the somski mod into it, the package extract-xiso-somski [2] has been made redundant and should be

[aur-general] Package deletion request

2013-12-03 Thread Nuno Araujo
Please delete subvein [1]. It has been renamed upstream to mutantfactions [2]. Thank you [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/subvein/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mutantfactions/ -- Nuno Araujo nuno.ara...@russo79.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message

Re: [aur-general] Package deletion request

2013-12-03 Thread Maxime Gauduin
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Nuno Araujo nuno.ara...@russo79.com wrote: Please delete subvein [1]. It has been renamed upstream to mutantfactions [2]. Thank you [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/subvein/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mutantfactions/ -- Nuno Araujo

Re: [aur-general] Package deletion request: libassuan1

2013-11-22 Thread Felix Yan
On Sunday, November 17, 2013 22:46:36 Tom wrote: Nowadays libassuan1 isn't required by any current package and at least I don't expect it to be so in the future. Thanks. Removed. Please include a link to package next time, thanks! Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a

[aur-general] Package deletion request: libassuan1

2013-11-17 Thread Tom
Nowadays libassuan1 isn't required by any current package and at least I don't expect it to be so in the future. Thanks.

[aur-general] Package deletion request

2013-09-22 Thread Haffmans, Wouter
Hello, The package doxgen-git[1] was uploaded with a typo in the package name (I've replaced it with doxygen-git[2] - the y was missing). Please remove the doxgen-git variant. Thanks. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/doxgen-git [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/doxygen-git

Re: [aur-general] Package deletion request

2013-09-22 Thread Connor Behan
On 22/09/13 02:35 PM, Haffmans, Wouter wrote: Hello, The package doxgen-git[1] was uploaded with a typo in the package name (I've replaced it with doxygen-git[2] - the y was missing). Please remove the doxgen-git variant. Thanks. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/doxgen-git [2]

[aur-general] Package deletion request: nghost3

2013-06-20 Thread Jonas Heinrich
Hey, unfortunately this project is dead and discontinued: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nghost3/ Please remove the packae, thank you! - onny pgpb9UkuA4ArL.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [aur-general] Package deletion request: nghost3

2013-06-20 Thread Bartłomiej Piotrowski
On 2013-06-20 14:28, Jonas Heinrich wrote: Hey, unfortunately this project is dead and discontinued: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nghost3/ Please remove the packae, thank you! - onny Done, thank you. -- Bartłomiej Piotrowski http://bpiotrowski.pl/ signature.asc Description:

[aur-general] Package deletion request

2013-04-16 Thread Benoît Zugmeyer
chromium-nightly https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/chromium-nightly/ I made a mistake by submitting a duplicate package (duplicates chromium-browser-bin). A little too enthusiastic about sharing my package. Sorry about that, won't happen again. -- Benoît Zugmeyer

[aur-general] Package deletion request

2013-04-16 Thread Igor Cardoso
About a month ago I submitted a package (vmware-usbarbitrator) that contained the VMware-USBArbitrator script, as well as a systemd service to automatically run it on computer startup. Now, Det has managed to integrate that, among other interesting features, in one package only: vmware-patch;

Re: [aur-general] Package deletion request

2013-04-16 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On 17 April 2013 02:17, Igor Cardoso igordc...@gmail.com wrote: About a month ago I submitted a package (vmware-usbarbitrator) that contained the VMware-USBArbitrator script, as well as a systemd service to automatically run it on computer startup. Now, Det has managed to integrate that,

Re: [aur-general] Package deletion request

2013-04-16 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On 16 April 2013 20:17, Benoît Zugmeyer ben...@zugmeyer.com wrote: chromium-nightly https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/chromium-nightly/ I made a mistake by submitting a duplicate package (duplicates chromium-browser-bin). A little too enthusiastic about sharing my package. Removed, thanks.

Re: [aur-general] Package deletion request

2012-12-30 Thread Felix Yan
On Sunday, December 30, 2012 12:41:30 PM Krzysztof AS wrote: Hi, Packages with request: -- derpity-gtk-theme: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/derpity-gtk-theme/ - author changed name to zukitwo - no updates after 2011-05 - page at gnome-looks been deleted -

[aur-general] Package deletion request

2012-12-28 Thread Charles Pigott
Hi, hopefully, i'm getting this mailing list format right... :L I believe that package openttd-ttdwin ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/openttd-ttdwin/) should be removed as it contains copyrighted files, that are illegal to distribute Thanks for your attention

Re: [aur-general] Package deletion request

2012-12-28 Thread Robert Knauer
On 28.12.2012 15:08, Charles Pigott wrote: Hi, hopefully, i'm getting this mailing list format right... :L I believe that package openttd-ttdwin ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/openttd-ttdwin/) should be removed as it contains copyrighted files, that are illegal to distribute Thanks

Re: [aur-general] Package deletion request

2012-12-28 Thread Charles Pigott
Ha, got it wrong :L Several problems with that: - http://www.transporttycoon.net/where does not contain anywhere you can download the files - What do you mean no unfree files in the source package ? ALL those files are unfree and are only available (legally) from the TTD CD

Re: [aur-general] Package deletion request

2012-12-28 Thread Robert Knauer
On 28.12.2012 15:28, Charles Pigott wrote: Ha, got it wrong :L Several problems with that: - http://www.transporttycoon.net/where does not contain anywhere you can download the files - What do you mean no unfree files in the source package ? ALL those files are unfree and are only

Re: [aur-general] Package deletion request

2012-12-28 Thread LordAro
On 28 December 2012 14:35, Robert Knauer rob...@privatdemail.net wrote: On 28.12.2012 15:28, Charles Pigott wrote: Ha, got it wrong :L Several problems with that: - http://www.transporttycoon.net/where does not contain anywhere you can download the files - What do you mean no unfree files

Re: [aur-general] Package deletion request

2012-12-28 Thread Robert Knauer
On 28.12.2012 15:45, LordAro wrote: On 28 December 2012 14:35, Robert Knauer rob...@privatdemail.net wrote: On 28.12.2012 15:28, Charles Pigott wrote: Ha, got it wrong :L Several problems with that: - http://www.transporttycoon.net/where does not contain anywhere you can download the files

Re: [aur-general] Package deletion request.

2012-11-13 Thread Ike Devolder
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 11:47:37PM +0100, N30N wrote: The following pacages are now avalible in the ArchLinuxARM repos. So I would like to request they be removed from the AUR. marvell-xbmc-git: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/marvell-xbmc-git/ marvell-ipp:

[aur-general] Package deletion request.

2012-11-12 Thread N30N
The following pacages are now avalible in the ArchLinuxARM repos. So I would like to request they be removed from the AUR. marvell-xbmc-git: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/marvell-xbmc-git/ marvell-ipp: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/marvell-ipp/ Thanks and best regards, N30N.

[aur-general] Package deletion request - i3-pango

2012-09-20 Thread Patrice Peterson
Hey, Please delete my package i3-pango [1]. I3 officially supports Pango since version 4.3, making this package obsolete. Thanks, Patrice [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59344 pgpiSmssXHLXd.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [aur-general] Package deletion request - i3-pango

2012-09-20 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Patrice Peterson ru...@archlinux.us wrote: Hey, Please delete my package i3-pango [1]. I3 officially supports Pango since version 4.3, making this package obsolete. Thanks, Patrice [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59344 Removed, thanks.

Re: [aur-general] Package deletion request

2012-08-01 Thread Ike Devolder
Op dinsdag 31 juli 2012 14:42:40 schreef Patrice Peterson: Hi, Please delete my tm-tools package [1]. I was being an idiot and didn't notice it already existed as tmtools [2]. Thanks in advance, Patrice [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59994 [2]

[aur-general] Package deletion request

2012-07-31 Thread Patrice Peterson
Hi, Please delete my tm-tools package [1]. I was being an idiot and didn't notice it already existed as tmtools [2]. Thanks in advance, Patrice [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59994 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55169 pgpiVbR9tSQCG.pgp Description: PGP signature

[aur-general] Package deletion request

2012-07-23 Thread mitsu...@gmail.com
Please delete python-wtforms[1] because it was replaced with python2-wtforms. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26120 Thanks. -- Tomoya Kose (mitsuse) mitsu...@gmail.com

Re: [aur-general] Package deletion request

2012-07-23 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 1:49 PM, mitsu...@gmail.com mitsu...@gmail.com wrote: Please delete python-wtforms[1] because it was replaced with python2-wtforms. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26120 Thanks. Done, thanks.

Re: [aur-general] Package deletion request

2012-06-28 Thread Heiko Baums
Am Wed, 27 Jun 2012 18:33:10 -0700 schrieb Connor Behan connor.be...@gmail.com: On 27/06/12 06:20 PM, Skydrome wrote: Requesting to delete my aur pkg https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=53452 I have made a split package https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30375 which

Re: [aur-general] Package deletion request

2012-06-28 Thread Dave Reisner
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 10:57:01AM +0200, Heiko Baums wrote: Am Wed, 27 Jun 2012 18:33:10 -0700 schrieb Connor Behan connor.be...@gmail.com: On 27/06/12 06:20 PM, Skydrome wrote: Requesting to delete my aur pkg https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=53452 I have made a split

Re: [aur-general] Package deletion request

2012-06-27 Thread Connor Behan
On 27/06/12 06:20 PM, Skydrome wrote: Requesting to delete my aur pkg https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=53452 I have made a split package https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30375 which incorporates the former. Thanks Done. There has been some discussion on this list about

[aur-general] package deletion request: fhs

2012-05-22 Thread Ruslan Nabioullin
I am requesting that the AUR package fhs [1] be deleted, as standards documents are outside the scope of the AUR. I am the current maintainer of the package. -Ruslan [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56396 -- Ruslan Nabioullin rnabioul...@gmail.com signature.asc Description:

Re: [aur-general] package deletion request: fhs

2012-05-22 Thread Alexander Rødseth
Hi, Could it considered to be documentation for the filesystem package? If that should be the case, fhs could be renamed filesystem-docs by submitting a new package and requesting a delete+merge of the old one. -- Best regards,  Alexander Rødseth  Arch Linux Trusted User  (xyproto on IRC,

Re: [aur-general] package deletion request: fhs

2012-05-22 Thread Dave Reisner
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 12:28:48AM +0200, Alexander Rødseth wrote: Hi, Could it considered to be documentation for the filesystem package? If that should be the case, fhs could be renamed filesystem-docs by submitting a new package and requesting a delete+merge of the old one. -- Best

Re: [aur-general] package deletion request: fhs

2012-05-22 Thread Ruslan Nabioullin
On 05/22/2012 06:28 PM, Alexander Rødseth wrote: Hi, Could it considered to be documentation for the filesystem package? If that should be the case, fhs could be renamed filesystem-docs by submitting a new package and requesting a delete+merge of the old one. Interesting, I did not think

[aur-general] package deletion request: django-svn

2012-05-01 Thread Alper Kanat
Hey There, I'm the maintainer of django-svn. Mainstream just migrated from their own subversion server to github. Therefore I created a new package (django-git) and uploaded it to AUR. I don't know whether if renaming packages on AUR is possible or not but it'd be nice to keep the comments and

Re: [aur-general] package deletion request: django-svn

2012-05-01 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Alper Kanat tu...@raptiye.org wrote: Hey There, I'm the maintainer of django-svn. Mainstream just migrated from their own subversion server to github. Therefore I created a new package (django-git) and uploaded it to AUR. I don't know whether if renaming

Re: [aur-general] package deletion request: django-svn

2012-05-01 Thread Ike Devolder
Op dinsdag 1 mei 2012 17:18:15 schreef Alper Kanat: Hey There, I'm the maintainer of django-svn. Mainstream just migrated from their own subversion server to github. Therefore I created a new package (django-git) and uploaded it to AUR. I don't know whether if renaming packages on AUR is

Re: [aur-general] package deletion request: django-svn

2012-05-01 Thread Ike Devolder
Op dinsdag 1 mei 2012 20:41:14 schreef Evangelos Foutras: On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Alper Kanat tu...@raptiye.org wrote: Hey There, I'm the maintainer of django-svn. Mainstream just migrated from their own subversion server to github. Therefore I created a new package

Re: [aur-general] package deletion request: django-svn

2012-05-01 Thread Alper Kanat
Thanks! --- Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 8:41 PM, Evangelos Foutras evange...@foutrelis.comwrote: On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Alper Kanat tu...@raptiye.org wrote: Hey There, I'm the maintainer of django-svn. Mainstream just migrated from their own

Re: [aur-general] package deletion request for facebook python sdk

2012-04-11 Thread Alexander Rødseth
Hi, Removed, thanks. -- Cordially,  Alexander Rødseth  Arch Linux Trusted User  (xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)

[aur-general] package deletion request for facebook python sdk

2012-04-09 Thread Alper Kanat
Hey There, Can you please delete the following packages? Some are removed in upstream and don't have any maintainer on AUR: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45906 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45908 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34328

[aur-general] package deletion request

2012-03-04 Thread scj
I would like to request the removal of the package retro-fossil [1], as the project has switched DVCS and is superceded by retro-bzr [2]. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45134 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57263

Re: [aur-general] package deletion request

2012-03-04 Thread Jelle van der Waa
On 04/03/12 11:10, s...@archlinux.us wrote: I would like to request the removal of the package retro-fossil [1], as the project has switched DVCS and is superceded by retro-bzr [2]. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45134 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57263 removed!

Re: [aur-general] package deletion request: waf-svn

2012-02-28 Thread Bartłomiej Piotrowski
On 02/27/2012 08:28 PM, François Boulogne wrote: Hi Could you delete python-waf-svn https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48189 Reason, waf moved to git as announced in one comment. Thank you. Cheers, Done. -- Bartłomiej Piotrowski Arch Linux Trusted User http://archlinux.org/

[aur-general] Package Deletion Request: 3to2-hg

2012-02-28 Thread Jarek Sedlacek
Can someone delete 3to2-hg? I maintain 3to2 as well as the latest version from mercurial, but since the project has stopped updating there is no point in maintaining the development version. Thanks, Jarek Sedlacek

Re: [aur-general] Package Deletion Request: 3to2-hg

2012-02-28 Thread Alexander Rødseth
Hi, Removed the 3to2-hg orphan. Please include a direct link next time. Thanks. -- Sincerely,  Alexander Rødseth  Arch Linux Trusted User  (xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)

[aur-general] package deletion request: waf-svn

2012-02-27 Thread François Boulogne
Hi Could you delete python-waf-svn https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48189 Reason, waf moved to git as announced in one comment. Thank you. Cheers, -- François Boulogne. https://www.sciunto.org

Re: [aur-general] Package Deletion Request: sqlplus11

2012-02-26 Thread Lukáš Jirkovský
On 25 February 2012 23:04, Jason St. John jstj...@purdue.edu wrote: sqlplus11[1] should be deleted because the submitter of the package basically admitted that sqlplus11 was a duplicate of instantclient-sqlplus[2] [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36198 [2]

[aur-general] Package Deletion Request: perl-shared

2012-02-25 Thread Jason St. John
perl-shared[1] should be deleted because it is *very* out of date, has 0 votes, has been orphaned, and the official 'perl' package provides the same functionality[2]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25536 [2]

Re: [aur-general] Package Deletion Request: perl-shared

2012-02-25 Thread Justin Davis
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Jason St. John jstj...@purdue.edu wrote: perl-shared[1] should be deleted because it is *very* out of date, has 0 votes, has been orphaned, and the official 'perl' package provides the same functionality[2]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25536

[aur-general] package deletion request

2011-07-21 Thread Auguste Pop
Hi, I am the current maintainer of osd-lyrics (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30489). One of the upstream developer commented on the package and requested a rename to osdlyrics, and I have uploaded osdlyrics (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50877) accordingly to AUR. Although

Re: [aur-general] package deletion request

2011-07-21 Thread keenerd
Done. -Kyle http://kmkeen.com On 7/21/11, Auguste Pop augu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am the current maintainer of osd-lyrics (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30489). One of the upstream developer commented on the package and requested a rename to osdlyrics, and I have uploaded

[aur-general] package deletion request

2011-03-07 Thread yanchenko.i...@gmail.com
please delete package pygments3 (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37546) , its in comunity now with name python-pygments

[aur-general] Package deletion request

2011-01-15 Thread Thomas S Hatch
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21687 is a duplicate of the correctly named ocaml-ocamlgraph, please delete it. -Tom Hatch

Re: [aur-general] Package deletion request

2011-01-15 Thread Dave Reisner
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 03:19:18PM -0700, Thomas S Hatch wrote: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21687 is a duplicate of the correctly named ocaml-ocamlgraph, please delete it. -Tom Hatch Deleted. Thanks, dave

[aur-general] Package deletion request

2011-01-01 Thread Thomas S Hatch
lwt: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33268 Has been replaced by the properly named: ocaml-lwt: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39089 Thanks! -Thomas S Hatch

Re: [aur-general] Package deletion request

2011-01-01 Thread Dave Reisner
On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 09:01:30PM -0700, Thomas S Hatch wrote: lwt: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33268 Has been replaced by the properly named: ocaml-lwt: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39089 Thanks! -Thomas S Hatch Package has been defenestrated. Thanks, d

[aur-general] Package deletion request

2010-09-23 Thread Gereon Schomber
Hi, I am the former maintainer of urbanterror-data that was adopted into [community]. However, my package urbanterror-client (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21494) still exists and is useless because there is urbanterror in community which serves the same purpose (I guess). Therefore

Re: [aur-general] Package deletion request

2010-09-23 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Gereon Schomber gereon_schom...@arcor.de wrote: Hi, I am the former maintainer of urbanterror-data that was adopted into [community]. However, my package urbanterror-client (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21494) still exists and is useless because

[aur-general] Package deletion request (was: PKGBUILD/AUR help)

2010-09-04 Thread Christos Nouskas
Loui Chang wrote: On Thu 02 Sep 2010 12:02 +0300, Christos Nouskas wrote: I'm trying to enhance the PKGBUILD of kernel26-pf to detect the cpu-specific .config option and automatically add it to the generated package and its description, by tweaking the $PKGEXT and $pkgdesc variables.

Re: [aur-general] Package deletion request (was: PKGBUILD/AUR help)

2010-09-04 Thread Brad Fanella
On Sep 4, 2010, at 5:47 PM, Christos Nouskas n...@archlinux.us wrote: Loui Chang wrote: On Thu 02 Sep 2010 12:02 +0300, Christos Nouskas wrote: I'm trying to enhance the PKGBUILD of kernel26-pf to detect the cpu-specific .config option and automatically add it to the generated package

[aur-general] package deletion request

2010-08-14 Thread Dave Reisner
Please delete the package systemd-initscripts-git, which I was, until recently, the owner of. It backs up onto a git repo (also mine) which is no longer useful. Thanks, dave reisner

[aur-general] Package deletion request (qlandkarte, qlandkarte-svn)

2010-07-01 Thread Matthias Männich
Hi, I am the maintainer of the packages qlandkarte (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18266) and qlandkarte-svn (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20219) These packages are obsolete since the project has been terminated and is continued by qlandkartegt. Can you

Re: [aur-general] package deletion request (nautilus-split-view-git)

2010-04-03 Thread Ionut Biru
On 04/03/2010 02:19 PM, M Rawash wrote: please delete http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26529 , it has already been merged upstream, and I was just waiting for nautilus-2.30.* to hit the repos. done -- Ionut

[aur-general] package deletion request

2009-12-14 Thread dave reisner
Created evince-lite [1] without realizing that evince-gtk was aimed at the same purpose. Serves me right for doing this late at night. Please delete my offending package. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32879 Thanks, Dave

Re: [aur-general] package deletion request

2009-12-14 Thread Ionut Biru
On 12/14/2009 02:31 PM, dave reisner wrote: Created evince-lite [1] without realizing that evince-gtk was aimed at the same purpose. Serves me right for doing this late at night. Please delete my offending package. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32879 Thanks, Dave done

[aur-general] Package deletion request

2009-11-17 Thread Ranguvar
Hello, Can you please delete my package, 'llvm-clang-svnhttp://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30359'? It does not fit in with the new llvm and clang packages in [community], and it'd be better for me to offer contributions to 'llvm-svn' and 'clang-svn', etc. Thanks! -- Ranguvar

Re: [aur-general] Package deletion request

2009-11-17 Thread Ionut Biru
On 11/17/2009 10:27 PM, Ranguvar wrote: Hello, Can you please delete my package, 'llvm-clang-svnhttp://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30359'? It does not fit in with the new llvm and clang packages in [community], and it'd be better for me to offer contributions to 'llvm-svn' and

Re: [aur-general] package deletion request (streamtuner2)

2009-10-15 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 6:53 AM, M Rawash mraw...@gmail.com wrote: official website seems to have disappeared (taking with it the source package): http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23738 Deleted.

[aur-general] package deletion request (mrxvtutf8-svn)

2009-09-04 Thread M Rawash
please delete http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25149 i'm re-submitting it under a different name.

Re: [aur-general] package deletion request (mrxvtutf8-svn)

2009-09-04 Thread Biru Ionut
M Rawash wrote: please delete http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25149 i'm re-submitting it under a different name. done -- Ionut

[aur-general] package deletion request

2009-07-12 Thread F B
Hi, the package codecs-extra could be deleted (it has been replaced by the new version of codecs) http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26969 and also this package is a duplicate of codecs but the maintainer seems to be inactive: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14946 Thank you in

[aur-general] Package deletion request

2009-06-17 Thread H . Gökhan SARI
Hello, I have packages gtk-imajdotat[0], imaj.at[1]http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19610, imaj.at terminal[2] are obsolete now because imaj.at -image uploading website- is not available anymore. Can you please delete these packages? [0]:http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19610

Re: [aur-general] Package deletion request

2009-06-17 Thread stefan-husm...@t-online.de
-Original Message- Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:23:45 +0200 Subject: [aur-general] Package deletion request From: H.Gökhan SARI h...@difuzyon.net To: aur-general@archlinux.org Hello, I have packages gtk-imajdotat[0], imaj.at[1]http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19610, imaj.at

[aur-general] package deletion request: aif

2009-06-11 Thread Dieter Plaetinck
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21526 (this package is maintained in extra) Thanks, Dieter

[aur-general] Package deletion request

2009-06-09 Thread flocke
Could someone please delete the package vget [1]. The project got renamed into cgetvid so I uploaded a new package [2]. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26884 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27130 Thank You! Jakob flocke Nixdorf signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [aur-general] Package deletion request

2009-06-09 Thread Daenyth Blank
Done