Re: [aur-general] SGE has copyright violation

2020-10-24 Thread Manhong Dai via aur-general
On Sat, Oct 24, 2020, 9:28 AM Ben Lönnqvist via aur-general < aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > On 24/10/2020 14.36, Manhong Dai via aur-general wrote: > > This package is in clear text-book copyright violation right now! The > > current maintainer is using my original SGE source code patch

Re: [aur-general] SGE has copyright violation

2020-10-24 Thread Ben Lönnqvist via aur-general
On 24/10/2020 14.36, Manhong Dai via aur-general wrote: > This package is in clear text-book copyright violation right now! The > current maintainer is using my original SGE source code patch file without > mentioning I am the patch's author and University of Michigan's copyright. > > I also tried

[aur-general] SGE has copyright violation

2020-10-24 Thread Manhong Dai via aur-general
On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 6:02 AM wrote: > Request #21898 has been rejected by Foxboron [1]: > > Not interested. The sge package is not going to point at your fork. > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Foxboron/ Thanks a lot for the reply! But I never ask the current maintainer to point to