2009/3/17 Aaron Griffin aaronmgrif...@gmail.com:
Finally pulled in the last patch there into my any-arch branch.
I'm not sure how I feel about it, seeing as it duplicates a lot of
work (I was hoping to reuse the loop somehow), but it seems ok
otherwise.
Now we just need to make sure db-move
Hello, fellow Archers.
Recently, I had a question about Vim, so I went to the #vim channel in
IRC. I was doing something
that should be working, but it wasn't. Surprisingly, the question came
up, Are you on Arch?
Turns out that several of the peolpe I most respect in the #vim IRC
channel are
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 10:54, Andrei Thorp gar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello, fellow Archers.
Recently, I had a question about Vim, so I went to the #vim channel in
IRC. I was doing something
that should be working, but it wasn't. Surprisingly, the question came
up, Are you on Arch?
Turns out
Thanks for sending it along, Dae.
-AT
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Kessia 'even' Pinheiro
kessiapinhe...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I had that problem too, i asked for something in #vim channel and they
only ridicularize vim package from Arch. I tried talk with Tobias
about the vim upgrade
Hi,
I had that problem too, i asked for something in #vim channel and they
only ridicularize vim package from Arch. I tried talk with Tobias
about the vim upgrade for support ruby1.9, but he are so far from fix
it, looking for problems which isnt important, in my vision. VI
package are with 65
Andrei Thorp wrote:
snip
There is a new vim setup on its way which should address some of these
issues. Not sure what the status of it is though...
Allan
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 9:54 AM, Andrei Thorp gar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello, fellow Archers.
Recently, I had a question about Vim, so I went to the #vim channel in
IRC. I was doing something
that should be working, but it wasn't. Surprisingly, the question came
up, Are you on Arch?
Turns
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 1:54 AM, Abhishek Dasgupta abh...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/3/17 Aaron Griffin aaronmgrif...@gmail.com:
Finally pulled in the last patch there into my any-arch branch.
I'm not sure how I feel about it, seeing as it duplicates a lot of
work (I was hoping to reuse the loop
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 11:35, Aaron Griffin aaronmgrif...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
What we could do is simply ship nvi instead, for that purpose, and
stick with only two packages, vim and gvim. That would help things
greatly.
snip
+1
It's been mentioned to me that several bugs are open around these
issues, and if this indeed the case, I believe it valuable to bring
attention to them -- a mailing list cannot hurt.
-AT
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Aaron Griffin aaronmgrif...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 10:49
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 7:44 PM, Andrei Thorp gar...@gmail.com wrote:
It's been mentioned to me that several bugs are open around these
issues, and if this indeed the case, I believe it valuable to bring
attention to them -- a mailing list cannot hurt.
Well, at the very least, I'm sure the AUR
11 matches
Mail list logo
