[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 12 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14

[aur-general] [Removal Request] Packages Cleanup

Hi, Could you please remove those packages of mine, they are all GNOME themes which will most likely not be updated for 3.6, most are from an artist who has quit maintaining his themes, one is mine and I don't see myself updating it in the near future, if ever, and the other two haven't been

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] Packages Cleanup

On 11/06/2012 07:01 PM, Maxime Gauduin wrote: Hi, Could you please remove those packages of mine, they are all GNOME themes which will most likely not be updated for 3.6, most are from an artist who has quit maintaining his themes, one is mine and I don't see myself updating it in the near

[aur-general] [Removal Request] tyrs and tyrs-git

Hello, I was wondering if you could please remove this two packages, tyrs [ 0 ] and tyrs-git [ 1 ] as upstream is kind of dead ( last commit is 8 months old) and the developer has stepped out and even recommended the use of another software instead of his own [ 2 ] Thank you in advance. [ 0 ]

[aur-general] Deletion request : trinity related packages

All the following trinity packages are orphaned and unable to build. I propose removing them all. Also, the recomonded way of installing trinity is through binary packages provided by 3rd party repo[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qt3-trinity/ (fail when applying patch)

[aur-general] [Removal Request] Avidemux-2.6-svn

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/avidemux-2.6-svn/ no longer needs repo move to git greetings

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] Avidemux-2.6-svn

On 11/06/2012 11:08 PM, SpinFlo wrote: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/avidemux-2.6-svn/ no longer needs repo move to git greetings Removed, thanks! Felix Yan signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-general] Cleanup of beagle related packages

All of them deleted. Thanks for the report! 2012/11/6 Jekyll Wu adap...@gmail.com The beagle[1] upstream is effectively dead. I don't think any major distribution still provides it. All beagle related packages on AUR are orphaned, and none of them can build (for various reasons). So I

Re: [aur-general] Merge request: sm-ssc into stepmania

On 6 November 2012 16:56, Devin J. Pohly djpohly+...@gmail.com wrote: Hi there, Could you merge the sm-ssc package [1] into the stepmania package [2]? [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sm-ssc/ [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/stepmania/ The sm-ssc fork is now the official code

[aur-general] Some Doublettes

Hello, these packages provide the same. ocaml-typerex https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56919 typerex https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/typerex/ Better name, typerex is not a library Both packages right now do not build under ocaml 4.0, but that may change. ndn

Re: [aur-general] Some Doublettes

On 06/11/12 02:22 PM, Stefan Husmann wrote: ocaml-typerex https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56919 typerexhttps://aur.archlinux.org/packages/typerex/ Better name, typerex is not a library Both packages right now do not build under ocaml 4.0, but that may change. If

[aur-general] Orphan request: freenet

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/freenet/ The maintainer has not for many months about bad checksums and a user's request for a systemd service (which was provided in one of the comments too!). In addition, he has another package flagged out-of-date since July.

Re: [aur-general] Orphan request: freenet

Sorry, it seems it's a bit of a false alarm; the package maintainer just contacted me saying he'll abandon it himself. On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Mike Swanson mikeonthecompu...@gmail.comwrote: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/freenet/ The maintainer has not for many months about bad