[aur-general] Please orphan python-vpython

2011-05-08 Thread Andrzej Giniewicz
Hi, the package python-vpython (which moved from extra) is terribly outdated. Currently at 5.32 and broken, while 5.71 is out for quite some time. The package wasn't updated since 13'th Nov 2010 (exactly at time when it moved from extra, it was never updated even a bit), and it is sole package of

Re: [aur-general] Please orphan python-vpython

2011-05-08 Thread Andrzej Giniewicz
Forgot the link, here it goes: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43529 On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 6:46 PM, Andrzej Giniewicz ggi...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, the package python-vpython (which moved from extra) is terribly outdated. Currently at 5.32 and broken, while 5.71 is out for quite

Re: [aur-general] Please orphan python-vpython

2011-05-08 Thread Ángel Velásquez
2011/5/8 Andrzej Giniewicz ggi...@gmail.com: Forgot the link, here it goes: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43529 On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 6:46 PM, Andrzej Giniewicz ggi...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, the package python-vpython (which moved from extra) is terribly outdated. Currently at

Re: [aur-general] Please orphan python-vpython

2011-05-08 Thread Andrzej Giniewicz
Thanks! 2011/5/8 Ángel Velásquez an...@archlinux.org: 2011/5/8 Andrzej Giniewicz ggi...@gmail.com: Forgot the link, here it goes: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43529 On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 6:46 PM, Andrzej Giniewicz ggi...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, the package python-vpython

[aur-general] Removal of gimpshop

2011-05-08 Thread JerichoKru
Unless someone knows better than I do, this package is broken beyond repair ( .bin extensions on EVERY source file). There are only two links to the source for this and they are both the same way. I'm not certain what were to happen if you were to strip the .bin extensions.it may be tainted with

Re: [aur-general] Removal of gimpshop

2011-05-08 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On 8 May 2011 23:37, JerichoKru jericho...@hotmail.com wrote: Unless someone knows better than I do, this package is broken beyond repair ( .bin extensions on EVERY source file).  There are only two links to the source for this and they are both the same way.  I'm not certain what were to

Re: [aur-general] Removal of gimpshop

2011-05-08 Thread jesse jaara
2011/5/8 JerichoKru jericho...@hotmail.com Unless someone knows better than I do, this package is broken beyond repair ( .bin extensions on EVERY source file). There are only two links to the source for this and they are both the same way. I'm not certain what were to happen if you were to

[aur-general] sanity check / review my first AUR package

2011-05-08 Thread Taylor Venable
Hi everybody, I just started using Arch a few weeks ago, and I've been mightily impressed. I want to help out, so I started looking in the AUR for things to do. I noticed that there doesn't seem to be a package for the devel version of SWI-Prolog. The stable release is in [community], and there

Re: [aur-general] sanity check / review my first AUR package

2011-05-08 Thread rafael ff1
2011/5/8 Taylor Venable tay...@metasyntax.net: Hi everybody, I just started using Arch a few weeks ago, and I've been mightily impressed. I want to help out, so I started looking in the AUR for things to do. I noticed that there doesn't seem to be a package for the devel version of SWI-Prolog.