Oct 2020 20:01:45 -0400
> Manhong Dai via aur-general wrote:
>
> > The comments were sent to me indeed. However, I didn't receive any email
> > notification about the package is marked as out of state.
>
> And what in the world does "out of state" even mean
a link under my package, instead of 'robbing'.
Now , all things considered, can I get the maintainer status back?
Best,
Manhong
Sent from phone
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020, 7:43 PM Doug Newgard wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 19:26:07 -0400
> Manhong Dai via aur-general wrote:
>
>
Hi Freswa,
Somebody pointed me to your reply in the list. I didn't even know that
the request in the AUR request system was sent to this email list, nor I
know such an email list existed.
I agree that you think you already gave enough explanation from your
point of view. However, please
Dear AUR administrator,
Can you please change me back to the maintainer of the AUR package SGE?
This saturday I got two emails. One is user "freswa" disowned this
package, and then 19 minutes later, another email said this package was
adopted. When I got the two emails, it was already too
our personal
attack in my previous email.
Yes, I can say sorry about ignoring hat.
Best,
Manhong
Sent from phone
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020, 10:11 PM Doug Newgard wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 20:30:11 -0400
> Manhong Dai via aur-general wrote:
>
> > Thanks a lot for your
this sentence below?
'You couldn't even get something as simple as the pkgver right'
It turned out I can read and actually remember
Best,
Manhong
Sent from phone
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020, 10:46 PM Doug Newgard wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 22:38:02 -0400
> Manhong Dai via aur-general
Dear Trust User,
I submitted an Orphaning request in both comment area and
ticket system. Feel free to let me know if there is anything I need to
do to follow up.
My email address is da...@umich.edu , just in case I missed
any emails.
Best,
Manhong
On Mon, 2020-10-19 at 11:17 -0700, Brett Cornwall wrote:
> On 2020-10-19 12:59, Manhong Dai via aur-general wrote:
> > Dear Trust User,
> >
> > I submitted an Orphaning request in both comment area and
> > ticket system. Feel free to let me know if there is an
Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Reply to your request SGE (Manhong Dai)
> 2. Re: Reply to your request SGE (Doug Newgard)
> 3. Re: Reply to your request SGE (Alexis BRENON)
>
>
> -
> -
>
> Message: 1
>
020-10-14 at 18:58 +0400, Archange wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le 14/10/2020 à 18:47, Manhong Dai via aur-general a écrit :
> > 2, Force an AUR package maintainer to join AUR-general, or send
> > every
> > notification to the package maintainer, as I never received any
>
Hi Sauyon,
Thank you! I learned!
Best,
Manhong
> Message: 5
> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 21:03:26 +0200
> From: alad
> To: aur-general@archlinux.org
> Subject: Re: [aur-general] SGE
> Message-ID: <683dd11c-f5f1-f0a6-8f97-acde1c8e8...@archlinux.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
>
> On
On Mon, 2020-10-19 at 20:41 +0200, Iyán Méndez Veiga wrote:
> On Monday, 19 October 2020 20:32:23 CEST Manhong Dai via aur-general
> wrote:
> > I am more than willing to listen to TU, as well as any other users.
>
> Okay, let's see if that's true and you keep learning. Can
On Mon, Oct 19, 2020, 4:34 PM Manhong Dai wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2020, 4:05 PM Amin Vakil via aur-general <
> aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
>
>> I remember you have said that you use this package on your servers in
>> university, so why don't you just create a new package with any
>>
On Mon, Oct 19, 2020, 4:05 PM Amin Vakil via aur-general <
aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
> I remember you have said that you use this package on your servers in
> university, so why don't you just create a new package with any
> modifications you need in PKGBUILD and even make it specified
On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 4:57 PM Manhong Dai wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2020, 4:34 PM Manhong Dai wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 19, 2020, 4:05 PM Amin Vakil via aur-general <
>> aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
>>
>>> I remember you have said that you use this package on your servers in
>>>
On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 6:02 AM wrote:
> Request #21898 has been rejected by Foxboron [1]:
>
> Not interested. The sge package is not going to point at your fork.
>
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Foxboron/
Thanks a lot for the reply! But I never ask the current maintainer to point
to
On Sat, Oct 24, 2020, 9:28 AM Ben Lönnqvist via aur-general <
aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
> On 24/10/2020 14.36, Manhong Dai via aur-general wrote:
> > This package is in clear text-book copyright violation right now! The
> > current maintainer is using my original
-- Forwarded message -
From: Manhong Dai
Date: Sat, Oct 24, 2020, 2:28 PM
Subject: Re: [PRQ#21898] Orphan Request for sge Rejected
To:
Cc: ,
On Sat, Oct 24, 2020, 7:33 AM Manhong Dai wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 6:02 AM wrote:
>
>> Request #21898 has been rejected
Request #22025 has been rejected by Foxboron [1]:
PKGBUILDs are standard enough to not constitute original work.
Please stop abusing the AUR.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Foxboron/
I am not talking about the PKGBUILD. I even asked the current maintainer to
remove my name from the
20 matches
Mail list logo
