Re: [aur-general] Should nvidia(-beta)-all replace all the other nvidia-* packages in the AUR?

On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 9:15 PM, Det nimetonma...@gmail.com wrote: On 3/19/11, Ike Devolder ike.devol...@gmail.com wrote: For me its all the same, you can remove the nvidia-bede package from aur i'll keep it in my own source tree because the nvidia-all package assumes the kernel version as

Re: [aur-general] Should nvidia(-beta)-all replace all the other nvidia-* packages in the AUR?

On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Det nimetonma...@gmail.com wrote: On 3/26/11, Oon-Ee Ng ngoonee.t...@gmail.com wrote: I can assure you that nvidia-beta-all (and nvidia-all which Det maintains) builds the modules for all installed kernels. I do? I didn't even know that. The Maintainer: None

Re: [aur-general] Please remove firefox-bin

On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Det nimetonma...@gmail.com wrote: On 3/27/11, Ionuț Bîru ib...@archlinux.org wrote: i do prefer to have them in aur, but the maintainer should follow firefox-bin as stable, firebox-beta-bin as beta. now there isn't any beta version available and it should be

Re: [aur-general] Adopting the paccheck package

On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 10:24 PM, Ionuț Bîru ib...@archlinux.org wrote: On 03/27/2011 05:13 PM, Bernard Baeyens wrote: IgnorantGuru doesn't intend to continue maintaining the paccheck package, which is now broken after the pacman 3.5.1 upgrade. I wrote an updated version which can be used

Re: [aur-general] Should nvidia(-beta)-all replace all the other nvidia-* packages in the AUR?

On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 1:39 AM, Rémy Oudompheng remyoudomph...@gmail.com wrote: 2011/3/31 Det nimetonma...@gmail.com: Not to keep bugging your mailboxes but I suppose the only real reasons for keeping all those nvidia-specific-kernel packages in the AUR boils down to these: 1) The user wants

Re: [aur-general] Should nvidia(-beta)-all replace all the other nvidia-* packages in the AUR?

Thanks for your response Rémy, On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 7:54 AM, Rémy Oudompheng remyoudomph...@gmail.com wrote: My definition was not about interactivity but dynamic nature. nvidia-beta-all is dynamic in the sense that it *computes* local variables that influence the resulting package. A

[aur-general] When should pkgrel be updated?

I've seen (in the past) various packages on the AUR which jumped by 3 or 4 pkgrels in a very short period of time. Sometimes it happens like this:- 1. Maintainer changes something and breaks the package with pkgrel=2 2. Bug reported on comments. Maintainer reverts change and makes pkgrel=3 It

Re: [aur-general] Reflector

On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote: Hi, I just wanted to let you know that I've moved the new Reflector to [community]. Given that it is a direct replacement for the old one, I didn't see any reason to pass through the AUR voting stage. Oh, and I buried the old

Re: [aur-general] Reflector

On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote: Oon-Ee Ng wrote: Hi, I just wanted to let you know that I've moved the new Reflector to [community]. Given that it is a direct replacement for the old one, I didn't see any reason to pass through the AUR voting stage

Re: [aur-general] Reflector

On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 10:11 PM, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote: Oon-Ee Ng wrote: Indirectly comparing your old project to excrement? Indirectly comparing it to a dead body. But hey, if you bury excrement in your back yard, who am I to judge you? At least it's not as bad as what Kaiting

Re: [aur-general] Reflector

On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:24 PM, Wieland Hoffmann themi...@googlemail.com wrote: Oon-Ee Ng wrote: On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 10:11 PM, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote: p.s. Please stop CC'ing me replies. It just sends duplicate messages to other folders. Sorry about that, gmail doesn't like MLs

[aur-general] Web-client for emails: [WAS:Reflector]

Re-subject - this is going OT. On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Peter Lewis ple...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: On Mon, 04 Apr 2011, Oon-Ee Ng wrote: I'll correct myself then, gmail+pentadactyl does not like the combination of mailing lists I'm on. Some of them are badly configured (thankfully

Re: [aur-general] Effective acne skin care

On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 8:53 PM, Jelle van der Waa je...@vdwaa.nl wrote: On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 15:39 +0300, Bergen .. wrote: spammy crap Oh this is very usefull , is there some 3rd party repo providing this package? -- Jelle van der Waa Oh, are we feeding trolls now? =)

Re: [aur-general] Orphan Request

On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Mark Foxwell fastfre...@archlinux.org.uk wrote: Hi, Please can you orphan offlineimap-git: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24202 I suggested changes to the PKGBUILD (see comments) and contacted the maintainer directly by email but no reply in two

[aur-general] Please delete cairo-tee and cairo-xcb-tee

cairo in [extra] already has tee support. cairo-tee[1] and cairo-xcb-tee[2] can be deleted. Maintainer for [2] has said as much, and [1] has no maintainer since the previous maintainer disowned it once [extra] got cairo with --enable-tee. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45693 is

[aur-general] Please delete kdelibs-nohal

http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39002 kdelibs from [extra] no longer depends on hal, so this package is outdated, orphaned, and no longer needed.

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request

On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 2:04 AM, Thomas Dziedzic gos...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:40 AM, roland karim roland...@yahoo.de wrote: I would suggest to delete the crossover-games-unsupported package, because there is no crossover beta package at the moment. Roland target

Re: [aur-general] GDeskCal

On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Martti Kühne mysat...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 12:39 PM, pauline martin 321enil...@gmail.com wrote: I don't know if this project has been discontinued or not, but it is flagged as out of date and I have spent a good amount of time trying to find

Re: [aur-general] removal of pidgin-gtalkinvisible

On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Martti Kühne mysat...@gmail.com wrote: please delete pidgin-gtalkinvisible [1], I'm the maintainer and announced deprecation in favor of pidgin-gtalk-shared-status [2] a month ago. cheers! mar77i [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30136 [2]

Re: [aur-general] removal of pidgin-gtalkinvisible

On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Ray Rashif sc...@archlinux.org wrote: On 17 June 2011 10:34, Thomas Dziedzic gos...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 7:45 PM, Martti Kühne mysat...@gmail.com wrote: please delete pidgin-gtalkinvisible [1], I'm the maintainer and announced deprecation

Re: [aur-general] removal of pidgin-gtalkinvisible

On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:49 PM, Ray Rashif sc...@archlinux.org wrote: On 17 June 2011 20:56, Martti Kühne mysat...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 9:00 AM, Oon-Ee Ng ngoonee.t...@gmail.com wrote: snip Actually, after some consideration his naming is more appropriate, since that's

[aur-general] Please delete mplayer-vdpau-pulse and mplayer-vdpau-pulse-svn

Please delete mplayer-vdpau-pulse [1] and mplayer-vdpau-pulse-svn [2], mplayer from the repos already has pulse support. I believe it has vdpau support as well (mine does, here) but based on a quick browse at the deps couldn't confirm that. [1] - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40575 [2]

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request

On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 2:45 AM, Alessio Sergi ase...@archlinux.us wrote: Hi TUs, please delete the following packages: ccsm++ [1] replaced by ccsm-git [2]; compiz-core++ [3] replaced by compiz-core-git [4]; compiz-plugins-extra++ [5] replaced by compiz-plugins-extra-git [6];

Re: [aur-general] OK! changing a PKG's name and retaining votes/comments

On Aug 21, 2011 3:38 AM, Ray Rashif sc...@archlinux.org wrote: On 11 August 2011 22:25, Lukas Fleischer archli...@cryptocrack.de wrote: On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 07:09:44PM +0200, Lukas Fleischer wrote: On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 05:35:00PM +0200, Lukas Fleischer wrote: On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at

[aur-general] Package merge request: kernel26/linux-ice and kernel26/linux-rt-ice

Hi, please remove kernel26-ice [1] and merge comments/votes with linux-ice [2]. Also, I would prefer that kernel26-rt-ice [3] be removed and comments/votes merged with linux-rt-ice [4]. The slight problem with that is that nvidia proprietary driver users will not be able to use linux-rt-ice,

Re: [aur-general] Package merge request: kernel26/linux-ice and kernel26/linux-rt-ice

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Evangelos Foutras evange...@foutrelis.com wrote: On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 8:10 AM, Oon-Ee Ng ngoonee.t...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, please remove kernel26-ice [1] and merge comments/votes with linux-ice [2]. Also, I would prefer that kernel26-rt-ice [3] be removed

Re: [aur-general] VCS Packages

On Sep 10, 2011 9:09 AM, Stefan Husmann stefan-husm...@t-online.de wrote: Am 09.09.2011 14:45, schrieb Thomas Dziedzic: On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 5:38 AM, gadget3000gadget3...@msn.com wrote: *Repo has moved:* audacious-hg (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25204) now uses git and

[aur-general] Please delete conky-lua-nv-old

conky-lua-nv-old [1] is an exact duplicate (deleting two commented lines) of conky-lua-nv [2]. The latter is out-of-date, but has more votes and predates (and was updated more recently) than the former. Please delete [1]. [1] - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47051 [2] -

[aur-general] Please delete pidgin-gtalk-shared-status

pidgin-gtalk-shared-status[1] should be deleted, as pidgin-gtalksharedstatus [2] is a better (my subjective opinion) name and pre-dates it, plus has more votes (and is actually up-to-date). I just disowned [2] myself since I don't use it anymore, but found [1] while searching for it, so I thought

Re: [aur-general] Please delete pidgin-gtalk-shared-status

On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Evangelos Foutras evange...@foutrelis.com wrote: On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Oon-Ee Ng ngoonee.t...@gmail.com wrote: pidgin-gtalk-shared-status[1] should be deleted, as pidgin-gtalksharedstatus [2] is a better (my subjective opinion) name and pre-dates

[aur-general] Please remove emesene2

Hi, emesene2[1] is in [community] and should be deleted. 1 - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48535

Re: [aur-general] GPG Key Signing

On Dec 1, 2011 9:38 PM, Jelle van der Waa je...@vdwaa.nl wrote: On 01/12/11 14:27, Ángel Velásquez wrote: 2011/12/1 Xyne x...@archlinux.ca: Hi Allan, I'm in the process of getting my key signed (Pierre has signed, Thomas and Ionut should sign soon, not sure if Dan will sign due to not

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request

On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote: rafael ff1 wrote: lib32-gail has a broken URL, is not updated for long time (since October 2008) and this software is implemented by Gnome's ATK since version 3.0. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17078 Please delete.

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] r8169

On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 9:05 AM, Jason St. John jstj...@purdue.edu wrote: I am requesting that AUR package r8169 ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44317 ) be removed. The r8169 package seems to have been created because of a bug in the 2.6.36 kernel which has already been fixed,

Re: [aur-general] removal request kde icon tasks

On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 6:43 PM, Alexander Rødseth rods...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, If a dev/tu adds a package to one of the official repos, they are supposed to also remove the AUR packages for the same software, as part of the process. Though I guess in this case this won't be done until it

Re: [aur-general] Disown Request cellwriter

On Feb 28, 2012 9:39 PM, Adonay Sanz Alsina ado...@kademar.org wrote: It's flagged out-of-date cause not compile. I can mantain it. Again, please don't do that, out-of-date doesn't mean has a bug

[aur-general] AUR helpers and AUR standards

Splitting off from the TU application thread that's becoming more of a discussion on the above:- My (user) perspective - when did being able/not to install packages from a helper (for example yaourt) become a benchmark for deciding how 'correct' a PKGBUILD is?

Re: [aur-general] AUR helpers and AUR standards

On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 8:33 AM, Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote: Am Fri, 2 Mar 2012 07:45:34 +0800 schrieb Oon-Ee Ng ngoonee.t...@gmail.com: Splitting off from the TU application thread that's becoming more of a discussion on the above:- My (user) perspective - when did being able

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: google-chrome-mini

On Mar 16, 2012 8:49 PM, Det nimetonma...@gmail.com wrote: This is not even funny: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57611 - A clone of 'google-chrome-dev' - Otherwise the same but the build and dependencies somehow more 'minimal' - In practice completely useless

Re: [aur-general] Deletion Request

On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 7:31 AM, Seblu se...@seblu.net wrote: On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 1:25 AM, BxS bxs...@gmail.com wrote: Dear TUs, please delete package [1], it as been replaced by package [2]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57910 [2]

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: google-chrome-mini

On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Taylor Lookabaugh jesus.christ.i.l...@gmail.com wrote: Have you tried emailing him personally? Obviously, from the reply seen earlier in the thread.

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: google-chrome-mini

On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Daniel Wallace daniel.wall...@gatech.edu wrote: this is the email I just got On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 10:55:16PM -0700, Tai-Lin Chu wrote:    i really dont think removing a pkgbuild just because they are    similar is a    good idea, given that we have tons of

Re: [aur-general] Automated Package Removal

On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote: On 09/04/12 17:56, Daniel Campbell wrote: I would contribute if a. My dev machine had internet and b. If i thought my work had a chance of being considered. Given that I'm not a TU or a regular among the devs, my work

Re: [aur-general] Compiz* package cleanup

On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera h...@osvaldobarrera.com.ar wrote: The following packages should be deleted (or merged in some cases). It's great that you're clearing thing up, good job =). You really should include package names in the email as well for posterity's sake

Re: [aur-general] TU application - speps

On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Massimiliano Torromeo massimiliano.torro...@gmail.com wrote: I never had a problem revealing my real-life identity on the internet but I also don't think that it actually changes anything since, as everyone else already pointed out, I think GPG identities are

Re: [aur-general] Vote results for speps' TU application

On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 7:20 AM, speps sp...@gmx.com wrote: On Tue, 8 May 2012 21:26:40 +0200 Thorsten Töpper atsut...@freethoughts.de wrote: Hello, the vote for speps' application is over so it's time to publish the results: Yes:           20 No:             1 Abstain:        2

Re: [aur-general] Catalyst/Nvidia cleanup

Sorry for top posting, android phone has a word limit for editing in line... As author of the (hacky) nvidia-*-all package, I can safely say that they're not meant to replace individual nvidia-*. Unnecessary rebuilding when only one kernel is updated and just not being the most kiss solution for

Re: [aur-general] Idea for AUR improvement

On Jun 1, 2012 10:03 PM, Marcin apos;sirmacikapos; Karpezo mar...@karpezo.pl wrote: Hi there! Few days ago I’ve installed Archlinux on my laptop again. One of the first changes I’ve noticed in my *.archlinux.org accounts was loosing all packages I was maintaining in AUR. It’s completely

[aur-general] Please delete dovecot-systemd

Please delete dovecot-systemd [1], I am the maintainer. Reason: systemd support already to dovecot in [extra] (bug-report closed here [2]) [1] - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47523 [2] - https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/22601

Re: [aur-general] testificate user massive spamming

2012/6/20 Callan Barrett cal...@zoocar.org: Hey guys posting +1 can you please quit it. The irony is making my head explode. +1 =p

Re: [aur-general] [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] final leg of /lib removal

On Jul 4, 2012 3:38 AM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote: We all know that no one reads the news items, nor dev-public, so I think adding an extra warning should save us a few hundred mails/forumposts/IRC conversations. -t I see a good opportunity to start pruning the list of users of all

Re: [aur-general] Orphan request

On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera h...@osvaldobarrera.com.ar wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, opensmtpd [1] seems to be abandoned. I marked it out of date, and left the author some tips on how to improve the PKGBUILD over a month ago, and there

[aur-general] Multiple Kernel modules in the AUR [WAS: Disown request: nvidia-pae]

On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 3:47 AM, Dave Reisner d...@falconindy.com wrote: On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 09:38:30PM +0200, Robert Knauer wrote: Hello, please disown nvidia-pae[1], it's outdated for more than a month now and I mailed the maintainer on 1st of September and got no answer. Thanks,

Re: [aur-general] Delete request

On Oct 7, 2012 6:03 PM, Miguel A. M. zodiac...@yahoo.es wrote: Hi! These packages are discontinued, please delete: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49488 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50619 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50621

[aur-general] python-foo and python2-foo - should they conflict?

Was just trying out some python packages and I realized I can't have both the python and python2 variants installed at the same time for python-networkx. Of course, there's conflicts with the license files and perhaps documentation, but other than that I wonder whether there's a use-case for

Re: [aur-general] python-foo and python2-foo - should they conflict?

On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 5:02 PM, Felix Yan felixonm...@gmail.com wrote: As mentioned in the Arch Packaging Standards [1]: /usr/share/doc/{pkg}Application documentation You should rename the documentation folder of your packages to /usr/share/doc/$pkgname, so there would be not anymore

Re: [aur-general] nvidia-ice needs to be updated

Shameless plug - why not just use nvidia-all (or nvidia-beta-all if that floats your boat). nvidea-X packages, where X is some custom kernel, tend to have very low usage since usage of X kernel to begin with is pretty low, and nvidia-X usage must be a subset of that. On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 5:03

Re: [aur-general] nvidia-ice needs to be updated

maintaining the nvidia-mainline package and I think it's better to keep them seperate as the nvidia-mainline package regularly needs patching to compile against the mainline kernel. On 25 October 2012 01:38, Oon-Ee Ng ngoonee.t...@gmail.com wrote: Shameless plug - why not just use nvidia-all

Re: [aur-general] craftbukkit getting frequently flagged

Just post a comment on the package? When this happens to my own packages I end up just leaving it marked out of date to save myself the emails, then tell people 'if its really out of date, post a comment'. On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Schala Zeal schalaalexiaz...@gmail.comwrote: I would

Re: [aur-general] craftbukkit getting frequently flagged

On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Schala Zeal schalaalexiaz...@gmail.comwrote: On 11/02/2012 07:32 PM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote: Just post a comment on the package? When this happens to my own packages I end up just leaving it marked out of date to save myself the emails, then tell people 'if its

Re: [aur-general] Systemd service files

On 28 Nov 2012 05:13, Martti Kühne mysat...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Stefan J. Betz i...@stefan-betz.net wrote: Never enable any service on install ;-) +1 Please keep arch passive. No automated configs, no automated breakage I'll have to search for. Thank you.

[aur-general] Please delete glselect and pselect related packages

Hi, [1] and [2] are old outdated and non-working packages. [3] was someone's project but the github doesn't exist anymore. [1] - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nvidia-173xx-utils-glselect/ [2] - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nvidia-96xx-utils-glselect/ [3] -

Re: [aur-general] Please delete glselect and pselect related packages

On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Felix Yan felixonm...@gmail.com wrote: On 12/02/2012 07:16 AM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote: Hi, [1] and [2] are old outdated and non-working packages. [3] was someone's project but the github doesn't exist anymore. [1] - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nvidia-173xx

Re: [aur-general] NVIDIA drivers

On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 6:34 AM, Maxime Gauduin aluc...@gmail.com wrote: That means downloading the x86_64 blob 2 times and the i686 one 1 time (I'm using a dkms version to not download them one more time for each of my kernels). Symlinks, man I fail to see the benefit beyond download

Re: [aur-general] NVIDIA drivers

On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 9:19 AM, SpinFlo sl1pk...@gmail.com wrote: well, i ve upload this package for the reason explain by @alucryd, need download up to 4 times the nvidia blob drivers for install dkms-nvidia-beta (was mine and left to use this package), nvidia-utils-beta,

Re: [aur-general] NVIDIA drivers

On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 9:32 AM, SpinFlo sl1pk...@gmail.com wrote: i ve use yaourt, yes, yaourt when make and install sucessful package delete all sources., then the symlink don't work Don't use yaourt then. On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 9:37 AM, SpinFlo sl1pk...@gmail.com wrote: sorry for the

Re: [aur-general] NVIDIA drivers

On Jan 26, 2013 6:10 AM, Rob Til Freedmen rob.til.freed...@gmail.com wrote: There is a dependency in nvidia/PKGBUILD which is totally wrong depends=( [...] nvidia-utils=${pkgver}) It leads to a circular dependency at ***build*** time and isn't really needed at run time for nvidia to work.

Re: [aur-general] NVIDIA drivers

On Jan 26, 2013 7:42 AM, Maxime Gauduin aluc...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:43 PM, Oon-Ee Ng ngoonee.t...@gmail.com wrote: On Jan 26, 2013 6:10 AM, Rob Til Freedmen rob.til.freed...@gmail.com wrote: There is a dependency in nvidia/PKGBUILD which is totally wrong

Re: [aur-general] NVIDIA drivers

On Jan 27, 2013 4:59 AM, Rob Til Freedmen rob.til.freed...@gmail.com wrote: Maybe I'm missing something ... but what could possible go wrong if we go with nvidia-utils instead of nvidia-utils=${pkgver} ? There's only one package named nvidia-utils build from the same source and always

Re: [aur-general] TU Application

On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote: Daniel Micay wrote: I'll even forgive you for being a closet iPhone user. :) In light of this revelation and by section 5, subsection 3, paragraph 2 of the TU bylaws, I hereby move for summary rejection of this application.

Re: [aur-general] Delete request: 2299thegame

On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Limao Luo luoli...@gmail.com wrote: I'm requesting deletion of my package 2299thegame [1] because the binary (from an older release) segfaults, there is no source I could find anywhere else, and even the original Realstudio source files cause a segfault when I

Re: [aur-general] iniparser moved to community?

On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Barton bar...@bcdesignswell.com wrote: It seems that iniparser-git [1] has become iniparser [community] [2], but I could be wrong. The second has a more recent date on it. -barton [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/iniparser-git/ [2]

Re: [aur-general] Unused account on BBS and AUR web interface

On May 4, 2013 11:34 PM, William Gathoye will...@gathoye.be wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi guys, I would like to contribute to the AUR, but it appears the account 'wget' has already been registrered, but no one seems to currently use it. It looks like someone has

[aur-general] Please delete evolution-plugins-experimental

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/evolution-plugins-experimental/ External Editior plugin is now enabled in evolution in the repos I'm the submitter and maintainer.

Re: [aur-general] Please delete evolution-plugins-experimental

On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 7:47 AM, Evangelos Foutras evange...@foutrelis.com wrote: On 26 June 2013 02:41, Oon-Ee Ng ngoonee.t...@gmail.com wrote: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/evolution-plugins-experimental/ External Editior plugin is now enabled in evolution in the repos I'm

[aur-general] Remove request - magic-background

Personal project of the author that he's lost the sources to (confirmed via email conversation with him). Please delete https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/magic-background/

Re: [aur-general] google-earth - Integrity checks (md5) fail

On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 10:53 PM, Alexander Rødseth rods...@gmail.com wrote: Rarely, if ever, do people simply dump command output on aur-general and expect anything to come of it. You're the minority. This is a logical fallacy and an appeal to popularity, this doesn't make him wrong. As a

Re: [aur-general] Merging request.

On 24 Aug 2013 07:23, William Gathoye will...@gathoye.be wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi guys, Could elementary-icons-bzr be merged into elementary-icon-theme-bzr to be in sync with elementary-icon-theme from [community] ? Merged, thx. Let me join the

Re: [aur-general] Delete request: python34

On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 1:54 AM, Felix Yan felixonm...@gmail.com wrote: On Thursday, March 20, 2014 16:37:42 Jerome Leclanche wrote: It is with great joy that I'm requesting the deletion of this package, as it's now available as community/python. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python34/

Re: [aur-general] Discussion about AUR packages signing

On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Dave Reisner d...@falconindy.com wrote: On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 09:57:24PM +0200, Fabien Dubosson wrote: Hi, I want to start a discussion about AUR packages signing. If this debate already happened, it means that I'm not really good with Google or unfortunate

Re: [aur-general] Trusted User application: Levente Polyak

On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 1:05 AM, Levente Polyak anthr...@archlinux.org wrote: On top of this I also had a look at the currently orphaned packages in [community] and I would like to adopt the following packages: ansible, awesome, cclive, codeblocks, fail2ban, fish, ncmpcpp, id3v2. Adopting

[aur-general] Should I request deletion for packages in this transition period?

I'm only now looking at the AUR4 migration guidelines, and I only have a few packages so I've been uploading to AUR4 manually. However, in the process I've found old packages which I no longer use or wish to maintain. Some of which should may be deletion candidates. Of course, those all belong

Re: [aur-general] aurweb 4.0.0 released

On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Giancarlo Razzolini grazzol...@gmail.com wrote: snip orphan and unmaintained packages anyway. I guess that if all of the Arch users didn't needed them in more than the two months that it took to migrate AUR3 to AUR4, it is a safe bet to say that there won't be

Re: [aur-general] We've got a spam issue in our AUR

On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 3:43 AM, Johannes Löthberg johan...@kyriasis.com wrote: Not all spam is automated , so just requiring a CAPTCHA wouldn't be very useful. I think a slightly better approach would be to add the comment to a queue if it fails the spam filter, and require a TU to approve it.

Re: [aur-general] Suggestion to add a pinned comment to PKGBUILDs of high risk vulnerable software

On Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 4:56 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Sun, 2 Jul 2017 03:49:10 -0400, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > > >Even if it weren't entirely up to the maintainer to pin comments, who > >are you proposing should be responsible for determining what

Re: [aur-general] Suggestion to add a pinned comment to PKGBUILDs of high risk vulnerable software

On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 1:47 PM, Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net> wrote: > On Tue, 4 Jul 2017 13:25:09 +0800, Oon-Ee Ng via aur-general wrote: > >This is the primary question here. If it's the maintainer then... what > >is this email thread even for? > > It's ab

Re: [aur-general] Could someone please bring back the skypeforlinux-beta-bin package?

On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 10:51 PM, Eli Schwartz wrote: > On 11/13/2017 09:35 AM, Michael Kogan wrote: > > @1) Sorry, I am using the GMail web interface and forgot that it is > quoting > > previous mails automatically. > > I feel so sorry for you! :D I hope you have the

Re: [aur-general] On TU application, TU participation and community/ package quality

Third-party non-involved user chiming in, but I do not think any sort of tenure/seniority requirement as mentioned in the final point below would be a good idea. Something based on recent activity would be better. On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 1:38 AM Bruno Pagani via aur-general <

[aur-general] Spammy post on cntlm's AUR page

Latest post, the only one by this account - https://aur.archlinux.org/account/RonaldSteele - post unrelated to other comments on cntlm and links to dodgy blog. Account just registered today. Surprised there's only one post so far.

[aur-general] Advise on updating/uploading binary package

I've been using cin-git for a while (which draws on cinelerra-gg project). For those who are unfamiliar, there's the 'original' (old and out-of-date) cinelerra, and a newer cinelerra-heroine, and the most popular one is cinelerra-gg. The 'cin-bin' PKGBUILD on AUR points to the original website,