Re: [aur-general] Why keeping OpenRC related packages on AUR?

On 9/16/19, fredbezies via aur-general wrote: > Hello. > > Note: posting in the right mailing list now. Oops! > > I hope it is the right place to discuss about this issue. I noticed > there is a lot of OpenRC related packages on AUR. I don't want to > start a flamewar, I just want to know what is

Re: [aur-general] About bullying in our community (Was: TU Application)

On 2018-10-30 01:23 PM, Adam Levy via aur-general wrote: > On Tue, Oct 30, 2018, 1:06 PM Daniel Capella > wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 5:02 PM Adam Levy >> wrote: >>> Being curt and direct is against the code of conduct? >>> >>> It seems to me that these three rules in particular are

Re: [aur-general] Can my AUR package be reinstated?

On 30/09/17 12:00 PM, Alad Wenter via aur-general wrote: > On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 04:02:00AM +, Adam Fontenot via > aur-general wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 12:19:34PM +, Alad Wenter via aur-general wrote >>> On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 02:17:45AM +, Adam Fontenot via >>> aur-general

Re: [aur-general] LaTeX compilation error in makepkg

On 09/02/17 10:21 AM, Bennett Piater wrote: > Hi, > I resurrected beamer-theme-metropolis when aurphan showed me that it's > maintainer had orphaned it because I use it quite a lot. > > The upstream was recently updated, but I cannot get it to compile from > makepkg -- the latex compiler complains

Re: [aur-general] xfce4-pulseaudio-plugin unused shared libraries

On 04/12/16 08:03 AM, NicoHood wrote: > I am currently updating the xfce4-pulseaudio-plugin and have a few > namcap warnings to resolve. Mainly I am focusing this kind of warnings: > > xfce4-pulseaudio-plugin W: Unused shared library > '/usr/lib/libdbus-glib-1.so.2' by file >

Re: [aur-general] bringing vis to [community]

On 17/02/16 12:09 PM, Christian Hesse wrote: > Hello everybody, > > vis aims to be a modern, legacy free, simple yet efficient vim-like > editor. > > That is what the readme says... I think this is a pretty good description. > As there is good documentation I suggest taking a look at the readme

Re: [aur-general] Should TUs tolarate inapropiate behavior in the AUR?

On 13/02/16 02:49 PM, P. A. López-Valencia wrote: > El 13/02/2016 a las 5:09 a. m., William Di Luigi escribió: >> Hi >> >> >> On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 8:30 AM, Ralf Mardorf >> wrote: >>> and at least two other maintainers felt harassed >>> by this maintainer >> Again,

Re: [aur-general] Should TUs tolarate inapropiate behavior in the AUR?

On 13/02/16 04:12 PM, P. A. López-Valencia wrote: > El 13/02/2016 a las 3:12 p. m., Connor Behan escribió: >>> WE, Dave Blair and I, BOTH SAID THE HARASSMENT WAS DONE *PRIVATELY*, yet >>> you are asking for public proof? Your sharpness is Sheesh! >> He didn't say th

Re: [aur-general] Archive of AUR3 packages

On 13/08/15 02:28 PM, Chi Hsuan Yen wrote: Dear Arch lovers, Recently lots of orphaned packages on AUR are deleted by Kyrias [1]. Are AUR3 PKGBUILD tarballs kept somewhere? I'd like to re-upload packages I'm using, but it takes too long time to write all PKGBUILDs from scratch. [1]

Re: [aur-general] How the Popularity value is being calculated for a package in the AUR4?

On 12/06/15 07:45 AM, Martti Kühne wrote: On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Magnus Therning mag...@therning.org wrote: No, and valuable != popular :) Any popularity contest is going to be biased in some way. This is as good a bias as any other. And let's leave completely out of focus that

Re: [aur-general] merging of aur3 comments into aur4

On 14/06/15 09:03 AM, Joakim Hernberg wrote: On Sun, 14 Jun 2015 14:01:45 +0200 Lukas Fleischer lfleisc...@archlinux.org wrote: We cannot merge comments easily as there would be conflicts with comments added on aur4.archlinux.org in the meantime. Why would there be conflicts merging the

Re: [aur-general] Duplicate packages

On 06/04/15 08:46 PM, Justin Dray wrote: Hi, I was just wondering what the process is when someone finds duplicate pacakges? Assuming I'm not the owner of either package, but someone has uploaded foo and foobar and both provide the same thing, what would be the best we to get that resolved?

Re: [aur-general] Regex on search page

On 04/11/14 06:38 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: On Wed, 5 Nov 2014 12:25:10 +1300 David Phillips dbphillip...@gmail.com wrote: I don't understand why some people are against such helpers. Without veering too far off this thread's topic, there's a large number of discussions on the web which cover

Re: [aur-general] Renaming of xfce4-session-nosystemd

On 15/06/14 01:11 PM, Aaditya Bagga wrote: On 06/15/2014 11:50 PM, Aaditya Bagga wrote: Hi, Could the package xfce4-session-nosystemd be renamed to xfce4-session-consolekit ? Link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfce4-session-nosystemd/ Thx. Pkg request to be merged/deleted:

Re: [aur-general] Delete vim-notmuch

On 22/05/14 07:33 PM, Felipe Contreras wrote: Hi, I packaged this plug-in as a standalon vim plug-in, however, nowadays it's bundled with the official 'notmuch-vim' package already. In theory I could update the package for the people that want to have the latest and greatest version without

Re: [aur-general] Merge syslinux-firmware-git into syslinux-git

On 16/05/14 01:03 PM, Keshav Amburay wrote: Hi, Please merge syslinux-firmware-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/syslinux-firmware-git/ into syslinux-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/syslinux-git/ . Thanks in advance. With Best Regards, Keshav Merged, thanks! signature.asc

Re: [aur-general] Requesting orphaning of AUR syslinux-git pkg

On 15/05/14 03:22 PM, Keshav Amburay wrote: Hi, I request orphaning of syslinux-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/syslinux-git/ pkg. I contacted the current maintainer via comment on the AUR pkg page on Feb 8th 2014 and via mail (quoted below) on April 24, 2014 with no response from

Re: [aur-general] [Merge Request] flamerobin

On 21/04/14 12:09 PM, Berno Strik wrote: Can you please Merge [1] into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/flamerobin-git/ The last update of [1] was in April 2009. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/flamerobin Merged, thanks :). signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-general] request remove:

On 20/04/14 12:10 PM, SpinFlo wrote: Hi please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vapoursynth-plugin-scrawl-git/ is now integrated in vapoursynth core greetings rm'd thanks! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-general] Please disown pdftk-bin / libgcj

On 19/04/14 05:50 AM, Florian Bruhin wrote: * Connor Behan connor.be...@gmail.com [2014-04-18 16:13:43 -0700]: On 18/04/14 01:28 AM, Florian Bruhin wrote: pdftk-bin[1] and libgcj[2] have been out of date for months, and libgcj doesn't build anymore. I'd like to take them over. I mailed

Re: [aur-general] Please disown pdftk-bin / libgcj

On 18/04/14 01:28 AM, Florian Bruhin wrote: pdftk-bin[1] and libgcj[2] have been out of date for months, and libgcj doesn't build anymore. I'd like to take them over. I mailed the maintainer over 2 weeks ago, with no answer. Thanks! Florian [1]

Re: [aur-general] Please disown pdftk-bin / libgcj

On 18/04/14 05:14 AM, Felix Yan wrote: On Friday, April 18, 2014 10:28:55 Florian Bruhin wrote: pdftk-bin[1] and libgcj[2] have been out of date for months, and libgcj doesn't build anymore. I'd like to take them over. Both disowned, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan I scrolled right by this

Re: [aur-general] Merge request

On 15/04/14 02:31 PM, Pedro Alejandro López-Valencia wrote: Please merge ee https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ee/ into ee-editor https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ee-editor/. Done, thanks! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: aqualung-alsa

On 12/04/14 08:26 PM, Rob McCathie wrote: Hi TU's list, I'm the original submitter of aqualung-alsa. Nowadays i'm the maintainer of aqualung and aqualung-svn too. aqualung-alsa can be deleted. For now people should be using the SVN package anyway, within which i've left a commented out

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

On 03/04/14 12:46 PM, Ivaylo Kuzev wrote: Hi, The package [1] is orphan and the features are provided by [2]. Please remove [1]. [1]: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ratpoison-xft/[1] [2]: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ratpoison-git/[2] -- Ivaylo Kuzev | @ivo Merged [1] into [2],

Re: [aur-general] Disownment Request: kdeplasma-applets-redshift

On 31/03/14 03:11 PM, thecatt...@gmx.com wrote: Hi, any news about this? Still no response from the actual maintainer. Regards. Disowned, thanks! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-general] Disown request: windowmaker-git

On 27/03/14 10:41 PM, Brian F. G. Bidulock wrote: Please disown windowmaker-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/windowmaker-git/ - not updated in over a year - maintainer responding to neither comments nor email - I have updated PKGBUILD ready to go --brian Disowned, thanks.

Re: [aur-general] celestia-addon-.* merge requests

On 02/01/14 07:17 AM, SanskritFritz wrote: I have renamed several packages of mine. Please merge the following packages: celestia-addon-apollo-soyuz - celestia-addon-apollo_soyuz celestia-addon-atlantis-2 - celestia-addon-atlantis_2 celestia-addon-deep-impact - celestia-addon-deep_impact

Re: [aur-general] museek packages cleanup.

On 26/10/13 01:17 PM, Karol Woźniak wrote: Hi all, it's cleaning time! As museek+ sources were recently moved from svn to git, I thought it would be good time to have a look at our packages for them. Therefore, please merge museekd-svn [1] and museeq-svn [2] into museekd-git [3] and

Re: [aur-general] Merge bugseverywhere into bugseverywhere-git

On 26/10/13 06:33 PM, Alfredo Palhares wrote: Hello fellow archinians. Please merge bugseverywhere[0] into bugseverywhere-git[1] the stable version of be is totally out of date, git is the only option. [0] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bugseverywhere/ [1]

Re: [aur-general] disown request: fuse-zip

On 26/10/13 08:16 PM, 徐林 wrote: I send E-mail to ur6...@archlinux.org.ua 2 weeks ago but get no replay at all. Disowned, thanks. Please include a link next time :). signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-general] Delete sixpair-bluez

On 26/10/13 11:01 PM, Justin Dray wrote: Can we please get sixpair-bluez removed: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sixpair-bluez/ It has been out of date for many years and there is already a sixpair package that is updated. Merged into sixpair. Thanks. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP

Re: [aur-general] Merge compiz-core-dev into compiz-dev

On 27/10/13 01:18 AM, Johannes Löthberg wrote: Hey, Upstream doesn't call it compiz-core anymore, the compiz-core-dev package hasn't been updated in over a year and is orphaned. compiz-dev on the other hand is named after the current upstream name and is up to date, could a TU merge

Re: [aur-general] Merge request

On 23/10/13 12:20 AM, Nuno Araujo wrote: Hi Can you please merge python2-virtkey [1] into python-virtkey [2]? python-virtkey is now a split package that builds binaries both for python2 and python3. Thank you [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-virtkey/ [2]

Re: [aur-general] Merge grub-bzr into grub-git.

On 22/10/13 12:05 PM, Keshav Padram Amburay wrote: Hi, GRUB upstream has migrated from BZR to GIT http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2013-10/msg00133.html . Therefore please merge grub-bzr [1] into grub-git [2]. Please note I was the original uplader/maintainer of grub-bzr but

Re: [aur-general] Disown request: tmux-git

On 09/10/13 04:09 PM, William Giokas wrote: - Forwarded message from William Giokas wgiokas@wst420 - Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 06:23:37 -0500 From: William Giokas wgiokas@wst420 To: Dmitry Korzhevin dkorzhe...@gmail.com Subject: Updating tmux-git to current vcs format User-Agent:

Re: [aur-general] Orphan Request: zsh-syntax-highlighting-git

On 06/10/13 02:57 PM, Sam Stuewe wrote: Hey all, I pinged the list a week ago about [1] noting that I had contacted the maintainer with no response, but that it had only been a week since I had contacted them. A second week has passed and I still have not received any word from the

Re: [aur-general] Orphan Request: haroopad

On 06/10/13 09:55 PM, 蒲肖肖 wrote: Hi, Would you please orphan haroopad[1]? [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/haroopad/ The package doesn't build and is out of date for nearly 2 months. I've mailed the maintainer of this package 2 weeks ago, but did not receive any resopnse.

Re: [aur-general] fontforge-git disown

On 22/09/13 12:48 AM, Arthur Țițeică wrote: Please disown fontforge-git as it no longer builds and the maintainer didn't respond to comments in a long time. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fontforge-git/ Thanks. Disowned, thank-you. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital

Re: [aur-general] Package deletion request

On 22/09/13 02:35 PM, Haffmans, Wouter wrote: Hello, The package doxgen-git[1] was uploaded with a typo in the package name (I've replaced it with doxygen-git[2] - the y was missing). Please remove the doxgen-git variant. Thanks. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/doxgen-git [2]

Re: [aur-general] Deletion and merge requests (long list)

On 26/08/13 09:58 AM, Lex Black wrote: Huge list incoming :) Following packages are out of date and orphaned and couldn't be revived, as their source is dead, or better PKGBuilds are available. -- https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xspice/ Should be merged with

Re: [aur-general] [100% off-topic] What happened to the arch general mailing list?

On 17/08/13 03:00 AM, Vitor Eiji Justus Sakaguti wrote: On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 6:11 AM, Magnus Therning mag...@therning.org wrote: On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 03:26:09AM -0500, Doug Newgard wrote: It's a moderated list and the normal moderator is on

Re: [aur-general] MSN Messenger and Google Reader

On 16/08/13 07:17 PM, Karol Blazewicz wrote: Windows Live Messenger (formerly MSN Messenger) has been deprecated. Is it OK to remove the various MSN clients from the AUR? What about programs relying on the discontinued Google Reader? Google Reader yes, MSN no. The servers are supposed to still

Re: [aur-general] Please rename vodafone-mccd to v-mobile-broadband

On 04/08/13 12:20 AM, Jonas Heinrich wrote: Hey, I would like to ask if you could rename the package vodafone-mccd [1] to v-mobile-broadband, since the author of the project renamed it [2] [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vodafone-mccd/ [2]

Re: [aur-general] Please merge gtkparasite

On 25/07/13 04:37 PM, Doug Newgard wrote: The package gtkparasite [1] is pulling a tarball of git master, making it a duplicate of gtkparasite-git [2]. Please merge [1] into [2]. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtkparasite/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtkparasite-git/

Re: [aur-general] TU application

On 20/07/13 09:53 AM, Sébastien Luttringer wrote: On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Dicebot pub...@dicebot.lv wrote: It is nothing of real importance but question is, what harm does explicit versioning do? Interesting question because it underlines some benefits of being a rolling release for

Re: [aur-general] TU application

On 20/07/13 12:40 PM, Karol Blazewicz wrote: On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 9:32 PM, Connor Behan connor.be...@gmail.com wrote: On 20/07/13 09:53 AM, Sébastien Luttringer wrote: 4) Speed It avoid pacman to checks version for each deps. This save a lot of useless computing (parsing and comparing two

Re: [aur-general] Please delete projects

On 14/07/13 02:09 PM, Anatol Pomozov wrote: Hi, Please delete my AUR project that are not needed anymore https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tarantool/ - tarantool-git should be used (upstream priject uses weird git tagging policy) https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tup-lua-git/ lua branch

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request

On 06/07/13 04:13 PM, Rob Til Freedmen wrote: On behalf of the maintainer patryk, I request deletion of https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/exfat/ which is a duplicate of https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/exfat-git/ There are no votes and no comments worth to preserve. Deleted, thanks.

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

On 22/06/13 11:12 PM, Jakub Klinkovský wrote: Hi, from [1]: Support for the features in xf86-video-fbdev-for-displaylink and udlfb from the AUR have been included upstream and are no longer needed. Use the official packages instead. xf86-video-fbdev-for-displaylink [2] has a

Re: [aur-general] Merge requests

On 22/06/13 02:44 AM, Sébastien Leduc wrote: Hello, Could you please merge: python2-pipeline [1] into python2-grapevine [2] and python-pipeline [3] into python-grapevine [4] ? The project changed its name upstream so 'grapevine' replaces 'pipeline'. Thanks. 1:

Re: [aur-general] AUR cleanup policy

On 19/06/13 12:53 PM, Karol Blazewicz wrote: On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 8:57 PM, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote: On 2013-06-18 13:48 +0200 Karol Blazewicz wrote: What's the policy wrt to packages that have been submitted years ago and are neither developed upstream nor maintained in the AUR since

Re: [aur-general] Merging of comp-scale-svn with comp-scale-git and engage-svn with engage-git

On 17/06/13 10:01 AM, Moritz Maxeiner wrote: Dear TU(s), the recent move of these packages' VCS from svn to git means that - as the maintainer - I had to create two new packages for them (as per https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/VCS_PKGBUILD_Guidelines). I would like to request for the

Re: [aur-general] rtmpdump-svn vs. rtmpdump-git

On 17/06/13 11:29 AM, Rob Til Freedmen wrote: We have these packages https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rtmpdump-git/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rtmpdump-svn/ and both giving the same upstream url: http://rtmpdump.mplayerhq.hu/ where it says: Download the source: *git clone

Re: [aur-general] clementine-rc

On 17/06/13 12:05 PM, Rob Til Freedmen wrote: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/clementine-rc/ has been superseded by the final release in community I suggest removal from the AUR Removed, thanks! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-general] Merge libefivar-git into efivar-git

On 17/06/13 01:14 PM, Keshav Padram wrote: Hi, PLease merge libefivar-git [1] into efivar-git [2]. The packagewas renamed since upstream was renamed from libefivar to efivar. Thanks in advance. [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libefivar-git/ [2]:

Re: [aur-general] [DELETE] ttwm

On 11/06/13 09:57 AM, Jesse McClure wrote: TUs, Accidentally removing the tarball from github is a good indicator its time to officially remove ttwm. Any ttwm users who've missed the memo, should switch to alopex-git. Please remove ttwm from the AUR:

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: mesa-r300g-xorg

On 10/06/13 07:48 AM, Martin Stolpe wrote: Hello, can someone please delete the mesa-r300g-xorg package. The xorg state tracker is no longer devloped (VMware switched to XA state tracker and AMD is using GLAMOR now). Regards AMD is using glamor for radeonsi. Isn't this package still the

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: mesa-r300g-xorg

On 10/06/13 02:29 PM, Martin Stolpe wrote: Support for the Xorg state tracker for at least the r300 was dropped some time ago: http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_itempx=MTI3NDA 2013/6/10 Connor Behan connor.be...@gmail.com On 10/06/13 07:48 AM, Martin Stolpe wrote: Hello, can

Re: [aur-general] remove savex

On 08/06/13 01:39 PM, Alexej Magura wrote: Could yall please remove savex, I was so excited about it finally working and everything that I got carried away and added it to the AUR way ahead of schedule. I both maintain the AUR package thingy for savex and develop savex. here's a link

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request

On 06/06/13 02:14 PM, foalsrock wrote: This hasn't gotten any attention.. I'd appreciate if a TU could take care of it. Thanks On Jun 2, 2013 7:37 PM, foalsrock foalsr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'd like to request deletion of the following packages which have been submitted and maintained

Re: [aur-general] ocamlnet

On 06/06/13 06:08 PM, oliver wrote: Hello, I just marked it as outdated... ...then i saw that it is orphaned and adopted it. It has 28 votes... pacman -Ss ocamlnet does not tell me that it is officcially now. Or is this planned already? If not, I will update the package during the

Re: [aur-general] Orphan request [5/27]

On 27/05/13 01:14 PM, Limao Luo wrote: The following packages https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/acroread/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dosbox-svn/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/violet/ are all broken atm, and have been for a while. The maintainer's email bounces, and acroread

Re: [aur-general] Removal Request: libgee-0.6

On 27/05/13 07:27 PM, Masato Hashimoto wrote: Hi, Please remove libgee-0.6[1]. It's idential to libgee06 on Extra. I forgot to confirm the legacy version of libgee is existent before submitting. Thx [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libgee-0.6/ Deleted, thanks. signature.asc

Re: [aur-general] AUR package removal request: nginx-spdy

On 27/04/13 03:25 PM, Gavin Lloyd wrote: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nginx-spdy/ The only purpose was to provide the dev version of nginx with the (then beta) SPDY module. As this has been merged into the stable releases as of 1.4.0, which is already available in [community], this

Re: [aur-general] Disown Request: Joomla

On 25/04/13 05:17 PM, Jonas Heinrich wrote: Hello, I would like to adopt the package joomla [1], which is flagged out-of-date since 22.02.13 and last updated on 22.10.2012. I tried to contact on 17.04.13 but did not recieved any answer yet. If possible, please orphan it for me. Best regards,

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: pcsx2-bin

On 17/04/13 08:21 PM, Rafael Ferreira wrote: pcsx2-bin [1] is around for sometime in AUR, but IMHO it is no use anymore since pcsx2 [2] went to community repo, thanks to Maxime Gauduin. I presume that no user objects deleting pcsx2-bin as I commented twice about deleting in pcsx2-bin's

Re: [aur-general] Please delete blender-collada

On 12/04/13 02:18 PM, Michael Wünsch wrote: Hi TUs, I am the maintainer of blender-collada. Can you please delete the package since main blender now has collada built-in? Thanks! Deleted, along with the -svn version. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-general] Orphan/merge request (Was: Merge request [Apr 14])

On 13/04/13 10:19 PM, Limao Luo wrote: On 04/14/2013 01:10 AM, Limao Luo wrote: Please merge https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libticables2/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libticables/ into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libticables/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libticalcs2/

Re: [aur-general] Delete request: zebra

On 28/03/13 08:47 PM, Brian F. G. Bidulock wrote: Please delete: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/zebra = website no longer exists = zebra has long been replaced by quagga --brian Deleted, thanks. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-general] Enlightenment merge requests

On 28/03/13 10:40 PM, Doug Newgard wrote: **MERGE** Enlightenment is switching from SVN to Git. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/econnman-svn/ INTO https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/econnman-git/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/etrophy-svn/ INTO

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: xmlrpc-c-abyss

On 27/03/13 07:24 PM, Jason St. John wrote: xmlrpc-c-abyss[1] was created to provide an abyss-enabled version of xmlrpc-c[2], but as of [3], the package in [community] has enabled abyss support. xmlrpc-c-abyss is no longer needed and can be deleted. [1]

Re: [aur-general] TU application from graysky - voting period

On 24/03/13 12:30 PM, Xyne wrote: Sébastien Luttringer wrote: Objections were raised and then countered with arguments. If anyone felt that the objections were still valid after that then they should have replied with their reasons. That is the point of the discussion period: to discuss

Re: [aur-general] Resigning as TU

On 16/03/13 01:16 PM, Dave Reisner wrote: Hey all, In the past couple of months I've been less active with Arch due to time limitations, and I feel like it's been even longer since I've really been active as a TU. I don't see this as something that's going to change in the near future. Given

Re: [aur-general] Orphan request: datovka, dslib, sudsds

On 15/03/13 02:20 AM, Martin Filip wrote: Hi, I'm requesting orphanage of package: datovka [1] and it's dependencies: dslib [2], sudsds [3] Owner's email is inaccessible (domain expired some time ago) and software is out of date. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/datovka/ [2]

Re: [aur-general] merge picard-plugins-lastfmplus into picard-plugins

On 13/03/13 05:06 AM, Johannes Dewender wrote: Please merge https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/picard-plugins-lastfmplus/ into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/picard-plugins/ The lastfmplus plugin is now included in the base plugin package. -- JonnyJD Merged, thanks! signature.asc

Re: [aur-general] Fighting spam on the AUR

On 13/03/13 06:57 PM, oliver wrote: On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 02:56:35AM +0100, oliver wrote: On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 09:31:47PM -0400, Allen Li wrote: [...] Limiting repeated actions also sounds good (if someone really needs to, e.g., flag a lot of packages, they can just drop a request here

Re: [aur-general] TU application from graysky

On 11/03/13 05:52 PM, Dave Reisner wrote: On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 04:24:31PM -0400, member graysky wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi All. Inspired by Allan's talk @ SINFO XX, I decided to throw my hat into the ring and formally apply to be a TU. My linux history

Re: [aur-general] AUR Maintenance

On 01/03/13 06:02 AM, Martti Kühne wrote: On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 5:07 AM, Connor Behan connor.be...@gmail.com wrote: [...] INSERT INTO `PackageComments` VALUES (17,46,68,'ruby bindings for fastcgi',1113164127,68),(28,69,65,'A countdown timer applet for the GNOME panel.',1113178883,0

Re: [aur-general] AUR Maintenance

On 28/02/13 01:54 PM, Phillip Smith wrote: I'd be willing to try and assist with this too. What is the format of that backup file? It is a 46MB text file of SQL commands; the kind you would get by running mysqldump. It only has 462 lines, but some of them are very long. The important lines are

[aur-general] AUR Maintenance

Some of you may remember the lost comments fiasco of 2010. When this happened, a file on sigurd was created aur-20100205-1859.sql.fixed2.xz with AUR comments that had been lost. I volunteered (on the mailin list) to help manually restore them to the AUR [1]. Since I did not know SQL or how to

Re: [aur-general] TU apply counselor

On 25/02/13 08:09 AM, Rudy Matela wrote: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Trusted_Users#How_to_become_TU.3F On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Jorge Barroso jorge_barroso...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi, I'm Jorge Barroso (jorge_barroso in the AUR), I've been an Arch user for some time and I've

Re: [aur-general] deletion request

On 23/02/13 10:04 AM, David Adler wrote: please delete chino-preset-default, it ceased to exist as an installable package. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/chino-preset-default/ thanks. How does it cease to exist? The source link is not broken and the PKGBUILD looks file to me.

Re: [aur-general] [Request] merge libdvdcss-svn into libdvdcss-git

On 17/02/13 01:00 PM, SpinFlo wrote: please. merge libdvdcss-svn into libdvdcss-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libdvdcss-svn into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libdvdcss-git because now un upstream migrate from SVN to GIT greetings Done, thanks. signature.asc Description:

Re: [aur-general] remove a comment from dolfin-bzr

On 16/02/13 12:55 PM, Myles English wrote: Hello, Please would a TU remove the comment by lecio at https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dolfin-bzr/ ? it is overly long, doesn't add anything to the package and looks untidy. I emailed him a few weeks ago to ask him to request its removal but

Re: [aur-general] Merge request

On 13/02/13 05:30 PM, Stefan Husmann wrote: Hello, Please merge sandy-hg [1] into sandy-git [2]. The maintainer and author agreed to this in the AUR comments of [1]. Best Regards Stefan [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sandy-hg/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sandy-git/

Re: [aur-general] Delete xbmc-pulse and merge morituri-svn - -git

On 10/02/13 02:25 PM, Frederik Freso S. Olesen wrote: Ahoy, Deletion: XBMC has been shipped with PulseAudio support for a little while, so xbmc-pulse[1] is not needed anymore. Merge: I took over maintainership of the morituri VCS package and moved it from Subversion to Git, so please

Re: [aur-general] Merge perl6-junction into perl-perl6-junction

On 03/02/13 05:31 AM, Konrad Borowski wrote: perl-perl6-junction is correct name. It isn't Perl 6 module called Junction (not that Perl 6 has such module, considering it's builtin language feature), but Perl 5 module called Perl6::Junction. Makes sense. Merged! signature.asc Description:

Re: [aur-general] merge freecol-svn into freecol-git

On 02/02/13 11:43 AM, Lone_Wolf wrote: Hi, Freecol project has switched from svn to git. please merge [1] into [2] [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/freecol-svn/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/freecol-git/ Lone_Wolf Merged, thank-you! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP

Re: [aur-general] Remove libsc?

On 01/02/13 09:50 AM, Karol Blazewicz wrote: On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 12:39 AM, Karol Blazewicz karol.blazew...@gmail.com wrote: The project's name is libbsc and not libsc, libsc PKGBUILD hasn't been updated in a while, while libbsc PKGBUILD provides the latest version. Both were submitted by

Re: [aur-general] Delete request

On 29/01/13 01:18 PM, Xavier Corredor Llano wrote: Hi please delete: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ncl-rangs/ because It was renamed to: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ncl-highres/ thanks Done, thank-you. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

On 25/01/13 03:54 PM, Axilleas Pi wrote: python2-six is in [community], I guess it's not needed anymore ;) https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-six https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/any/python2-six/ Gone, thanks. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-general] AUR Purge Request

On 19/01/13 03:49 PM, Federico Cinelli wrote: meego is no longer maintained upstream. Requestion the following packages be purged from the AUR. eom-git libmeegotouch-git madde madde-configurations media-explorer meegen-git meego-cursor-theme-git meego-gnome-control-center-git

Re: [aur-general] TU application

On 17/01/13 11:46 AM, Alexandre Filgueira wrote: Hi everybody, This whole thing of becoming a TU began after talking by email with Allan about one article of his where he talked about one project of mine. He put me in contact with Evangelos Foutras to be my sponsor, and here I am trying to

Re: [aur-general] Merge request [Jan 14]

On 14/01/13 08:18 PM, Limao Luo wrote: Please merge https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-paste-deploy into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-paste-deploy Thanks in advance. Done, thanks. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-general] [MERGE] fdk-aac into libfdk-aac and fdk-aac-git into libfdk-aac-git

On 08/01/13 02:08 PM, l...@fakeoutdoorsman.com wrote: This is to differentiate the library other packages such as fdkaac-git. fdk-aac [1] into libfdk-aac [2] [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fdk-aac/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libfdk-aac/ fdk-aac-git [3] into

Re: [aur-general] Removal Request: libgusb-ceton

On 02/01/13 08:36 AM, Jameson wrote: This should no longer be needed since libgusb moved to 1.4. If that version doesn't work, I'll have to setup a libgusb-git, anyway. Thanks. =-Jameson rm'd thanks! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-general] Requests

On 02/01/13 08:57 AM, Limao Luo wrote: Merge https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/terminal-git/ into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfce4-terminal-git/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-wsgiref/ into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-wsgiref/

Re: [aur-general] Merging package pysvn

On 02/01/13 01:52 PM, Richard Didier wrote: Hello, Can you merging package pysvn-py2 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pysvn-py2/ with python2-pysvn https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-pysvn/ this is for use correct python package naming

Re: [aur-general] Merge request

On 02/01/13 01:55 PM, Hyacinthe Cartiaux wrote: Hello, Could you please merge kde-service-menu-manager[1] into kcm-servicemenus[2] ? [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kde-service-menu-manager/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kcm-servicemenus/ Thanks ! Hyacinthe Merged,

  1   2   >