Re: [Aus-soaring] Discus - was 20M gliders

2014-07-14 Thread Anthony Smith
The Discus was the first to explore a new concept in glider design. Previously designers had tried to provide a very wide laminar drag bucket from min sink through to VNE (or thereabouts). The Discus designers decided to optimise the airfoil from around min sink speed to a reasonable

Re: [Aus-soaring] Discus - was 20M gliders

2014-07-14 Thread Peter Champness
Very Interesting. Do we know what characteristics of the airfoil lead the narrow drag bucket? On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 7:38 PM, Anthony Smith anthony.sm...@adelaide.on.net wrote: The Discus was the first to explore a new concept in glider design. Previously designers had tried to provide

Re: [Aus-soaring] Discus - was 20M gliders

2014-07-14 Thread Anthony Smith
. Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] Discus - was 20M gliders Very Interesting. Do we know what characteristics of the airfoil lead the narrow drag bucket? On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 7:38 PM, Anthony Smith anthony.sm...@adelaide.on.net mailto:anthony.sm...@adelaide.on.net wrote: The Discus

Re: [Aus-soaring] Discus - was 20M gliders

2014-07-14 Thread Mike Borgelt
If you read the Abbott and von Doenhoff book Theory of Wing sections you can look at the NACA airfoils and the low drag regions. In general, the narrower the drag bucket the lower the drag when in the bucket. The airfoils like on the Discus have a problem in that as the angle of attack

Re: [Aus-soaring] Discus - was 20M gliders

2014-07-14 Thread Derek Ruddock
, 14 July 2014 9:03 PM To: 'Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.' Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] Discus - was 20M gliders Typically an non-flapped airfoil will have curvature on the lower side of the airfoil to help keep the airflow accelerated on the lower surface as the angle