On 22/09/2014 3:47 pm, Texler, Michael wrote:
There has been recent press/hype about hack-ability of new cars that use
Bluetooth and Wi-Fi. Media beat-up, panic or some merit?
(http://au.pcmag.com/opinion/23312/security-experts-identify-20-most-hackable-cars)
Well, certainly makes stealing
The stats were interesting. Pilot error is the leading cause of airliner
accidents, greater than all other causes combined.
However maybe we still want a pilot there. Sometimes they manage the right
response when all else fails.
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Nelson Handcock
-boun...@lists.internode.on.net] On Behalf Of Peter Champness
Sent: Monday, 22 September 2014 5:50 PM
To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] Would you fly on a pilotless plane?
The stats were interesting. Pilot error is the leading cause of airliner
That's self defeating, what about all the times the pilot has done
something wrong a computer would have handled fine?
It's just a matter of time... Self flying planes should be a much simpler
problem than self driving cars/buses/trucks.
___
Aus-soaring
Has anyone else read QF32 by Richard de Crespigny? Might change your mind
about the pilot and dog theory...
ROSS
_
___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Somewhat offtopic perhaps, but would be interested in
observations/reactions from the soaring community
http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/technology/sci-tech/are-you-ready-to-fly-on-a-pilotless-plane-20140921-10j70w.html
___
Aus-soaring mailing list
There has been recent press/hype about hack-ability of new cars that use
Bluetooth and Wi-Fi. Media beat-up, panic or some merit?
(http://au.pcmag.com/opinion/23312/security-experts-identify-20-most-hackable-cars)
Would a pilotless aircraft be any less susceptible to been hacked?
On the flip
