Hi Alexandre,
* Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote on Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 01:47:12PM CEST:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 01:22:14PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
I merely wonder what AT_DATA was invented for then.
Keeping track of files.
Hi Ralf,
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 10:15:11AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
The only thing the test suite needs to know is: Can we run executables
intended for $build at all or not? This may be found out with
AC_RUN_IFELSE for once and all, [...]
You don't have to use AC_RUN_IFELSE. Just
Hi Stepan,
* Stepan Kasal wrote on Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 11:38:04AM CEST:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 10:15:11AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
The only thing the test suite needs to know is: Can we run executables
intended for $build at all or not? This may be found out with
AC_RUN_IFELSE for
Hi
How could I change the output of the compiling line when used autoconf
(Makefiles created via configure from Makefile.am's) when using
dependency checking?
I have autoconf created project.
Makefile.am is about following:
noinst_LIBRARIES = libcommon.a
libcommon_a_SOURCES = source.cpp \
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 10:09:51PM +0300, Ilkka Urtamo wrote:
Is it possible to change the output to simple
g++ source.cpp
This way any warnings are much more readable when compiling multible
source files and there is lots of different flags/paths in the g++ line.
Sorry if this is too
