* J.T. Conklin wrote on Sun, May 29, 2005 at 07:34:46PM CEST:
Does anyone have a macro for testing gcc's symbol visibility options
(-fvisibility=hidden, etc.)? The ACE/TAO autoconf scripts currently
checks for gcc/g++ = 4.0, but that loses on non-ELF targets.
I believe some Intel compilers
Thanks to all of you who gave comments, suggestions and corrections to the
tutorial I posted.
-Ed
--
(You can't go wrong with psycho-rats.) (er258)(@)(eng.cam)(.ac.uk)
/d{def}def/f{/Times findfont s scalefont setfont}d/s{10}d/r{roll}d f 5/m
{moveto}d -1 r 230 350 m 0 1 179{1 index show
I have an app I'd like to compile with tcc -b if available, otherwise try
gcc, and if that is unavailable too, then try cc.
autoconf seems to want to do gcc, falling back on cc, out of the box.
But how might I make it prefer tcc -b over gcc?
Thanks!
Hi,
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 05:27:08PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Note also that some compilers won't error out on unknown flags (esp
Intel ones :) but only issue a warning. This may or may not matter for
you. If it does: For example, Libtool-1.5.18 employs some trickery to
find out the
Hi,
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 10:27:01AM -0700, Dan Stromberg wrote:
I have an app I'd like to compile with tcc -b if available, otherwise try
gcc, and if that is unavailable too, then try cc.
place
AC_PROG_CC([tcc -b gcc cc])
near the top of your configure.ac
Stepan
On Tue, 31 May 2005 21:16:00 +0200, Stepan Kasal wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 10:27:01AM -0700, Dan Stromberg wrote:
I have an app I'd like to compile with tcc -b if available, otherwise try
gcc, and if that is unavailable too, then try cc.
place
AC_PROG_CC([tcc -b gcc cc])
Dan Stromberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 31 May 2005 21:16:00 +0200, Stepan Kasal wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 10:27:01AM -0700, Dan Stromberg wrote:
I have an app I'd like to compile with tcc -b if available, otherwise try
gcc, and if that is unavailable too, then try cc.
