Hi,
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 12:55:31PM -0700, Dan Stromberg wrote:
...but it's not finding tcc. Perhaps it's looking for a program called
tcc -b, and not a program called tcc with a -b argument?
No, it should look for tcc. Does the following work:
AC_CHECK_PROGS(FOO1, [tcc -b gcc
* J.T. Conklin wrote on Tue, May 31, 2005 at 08:37:44PM CEST:
Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* J.T. Conklin wrote on Sun, May 29, 2005 at 07:34:46PM CEST:
Does anyone have a macro for testing gcc's symbol visibility options
(-fvisibility=hidden, etc.)? The ACE/TAO autoconf
Hello,
I am trying to put checks for available programs in a
for loop in a configure.ac script.
My first attempt was:
for NAME in cp du mv rm sh su mkdir rmdir bunzip2
bzip2 compress gunzip gzip tar unzip zip
do
AC_PATH_PROG($NAME, $NAME, [no])
done
This does not work, so I wrote
Hello Claudio,
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 07:39:58AM -0700, Claudio Fontana wrote:
for NAME in cp du mv rm sh su mkdir rmdir bunzip2
bzip2 compress gunzip gzip tar unzip zip
do
AC_PATH_PROG($NAME, $NAME, [no])
done
The problem with is that the AC_*PROG macros expect a literal as
a
Stepan Kasal [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think that the patch which would put AS_VAR_* to programs.m4 would
present a useful general improvement.
Paul, would you accept such a patch?
That sounds good to me, yess.
I think the best solution is to drop caching from programs.m4.
You can also
On Wed, 2005-06-01 at 18:33 +0200, Stepan Kasal wrote:
I think the best solution is to drop caching from programs.m4.
Only over my dead body ;-)
Caching was invented mainly for expensive tests which involve
calling a compiler, which can be really slow.
No, caching had been invented for faster
On Wed, 1 Jun 2005, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Wed, 2005-06-01 at 18:33 +0200, Stepan Kasal wrote:
I think the best solution is to drop caching from programs.m4.
Only over my dead body ;-)
Caching was invented mainly for expensive tests which involve
calling a compiler, which can be
