Hello,
I have just committed this patch.
Stepan
2005-09-01 Stepan Kasal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* doc/autoconf.texi (Configuration Headers): Add an index entry
for AH_HEADER.
Index: doc/autoconf.texi
===
RCS file:
Stepan Kasal [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Do you like this patch?
Can I commit it, as soon as the mentioned bug is fixed?
Yes, please. Thanks.
2005-08-31 Stepan Kasal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* lib/autoconf/libs.m4 (AC_SEARCH_LIBS): Merge the two AC_LINK_IFELSE
calls, so that the
Hi Ben, Vincent,
* Ben Pfaff wrote on Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 04:57:36PM CEST:
AC_COMPILE_IFELSE generates a test that only checks the exit status
of the compiler command. But this is not sufficient:
*snip*
demon ~ % cc -DFOO tst.c echo OK
cc-1035 cc: WARNING File = tst.c, Line = 2
#error
Hello,
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 06:10:49PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Again I'll only refer to part of your well-written mail, [...]
... and I'm answering in a hurry now, so I should apologize, too.
[m4_require([_LT_SET_OPTIONS], [_LT_SET_OPTIONS([$1])])[]dnl
yes, this works now and should
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 07:57:36AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
demon ~ % uname -a
IRIX64 demon 6.5 01062343 IP35
demon ~ % cat tst.c
#ifdef FOO
# error FOO is defined
#endif
int main(void)
{
return 0;
}
demon ~ % cc -DFOO tst.c echo OK
cc-1035 cc: WARNING File = tst.c, Line = 2
Ben Pfaff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
AC_COMPILE_IFELSE generates a test that only checks the exit status
of the compiler command. But this is not sufficient:
My own feeling is that if the compiler exits with a nonzero status
and produces working object code, then it succeeded, regardless of
Hello,
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 11:51:41AM -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
3) Do not branch from the IF-SUCCESS or IF-FAILURE.
you are right, of course.
Stepan
On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 17:35 +0200, Stepan Kasal wrote:
Hello,
I noticed the above.
If we are to fix it, we probably have to invent new name for
AC_EGREP_CPP and AC_EGREP_HEADER?
What about AC_GREP_E_CPP and AC_GREP_E_HEADER?
The old ones would become obsolete...
Wdyt?
Unless there
