On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:22 PM, narke narkewo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 27 July 2011 14:36, Gary V. Vaughan g...@vaughan.pe wrote:
because those are in the users' namespace. Instead, Makefile.am should
be setting required (but not compiler specific!!) options inside
On 31 Jul 2011, at 02:04, NightStrike wrote:
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:22 PM, narke narkewo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 27 July 2011 14:36, Gary V. Vaughan g...@vaughan.pe wrote:
because those are in the users' namespace. Instead, Makefile.am should
be setting required (but not compiler
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Gary V. Vaughan g...@gnu.org wrote:
On 31 Jul 2011, at 02:04, NightStrike wrote:
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:22 PM, narke narkewo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 27 July 2011 14:36, Gary V. Vaughan g...@vaughan.pe wrote:
because those are in the users' namespace.
On 31 Jul 2011, at 06:57, NightStrike wrote:
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Gary V. Vaughan g...@gnu.org wrote:
On 31 Jul 2011, at 02:04, NightStrike wrote:
Unless I'm completely wrong, and there is in fact some sort of
standard for compiler options other than do whatever gcc does.
For
