Hi;
in Autoconf-2.64, AT_TESTED() only works with utilities that would be found
with AC_CHECK_PROGS(). Full pathnames don't work, so tools such as
AC_PATH_PROGS() that report a full pathname cannot be AT_TESTED().
The following patch should resolve this -- really all it does is preface a
/ into
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 13:01, Eric Blake e...@byu.net wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Allan Clark on 11/17/2009 3:30 AM:
Hi;
in Autoconf-2.64, AT_TESTED() only works with utilities that would be
found
with AC_CHECK_PROGS(). Full pathnames don't
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 02:13, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.netwrote:
We have a makefile in a project, which works well. In the short term at
least, we do not want to use autoconf to create a makefile, but instead use
our own.
However, it would be nice to have a configure script at
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 09:34, 张亚霏 zhangyafeik...@gmail.com wrote:
hi all:
I write these lines in configure.in:
AC_CHECK_LIB([pcre], [pcre_compile],
[build_pcre=true],
[build_pcre=false])
AM_CONDITIONAL([BUILD_PCRE],[test $build_pcre = true])
AC_MSG_CHECKING(pcrecpp)
AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([
On Sep 28, 2009, at 12:04, Alfred M. Szmidt a...@gnu.org wrote:
There is an article called recursive make considered harmful.
According to it, you should have just one Makefile.am in top level
with all the rules (all libs etc). By this, make can show its
strengths best. Often, a
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 18:00, imfel...@gmail.com imfel...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm trying to temporarily fork off a daemon (BIND's named) within a
testsuite. Yet the testsuite hangs despite having started the daemon. Below
is an excerpt of the circumstances. Running testsuite -v shows that the
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 14:22, Bob Friesenhahn
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Tue, 2 Sep 2008, Harlan Stenn wrote:
I've used cross-compiles (off and on) for years and I gotta say the
first time I got this message I probably did some pissing and moaning.
But I do believe that proper naming is the
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 03:24, Erik de Castro Lopo [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Robert Rehammar wrote:
This way autotools would
integrate with (e.g.) apt to make installations more smooth. This would
save the user the work to download and install all packages that bar
depends on and that
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 17:14, Bob Friesenhahn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
IMVHO any kind of repetition of knowledge encoded in rpm and apt
(or system vendor X package) databases is not tolerable, if it needs to
be hand-maintained in any way. It's
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 17:37, Bob Friesenhahn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, Allan Clark wrote:
Heh. Jokes aside, I figured there's a good chance that the same project
(ie
http://freshmeat.net/projects/{PROJECT}http://freshmeat.net/projects/%7BPROJECT%7Dor
http
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 21:27, Tim Post [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Richard,
On Sat, 2008-07-26 at 15:07 +0100, Richard Ash wrote:
Such a look up table would be priceless, I think :) I have had zero
luck
in finding one.
A compiled table would be large, cumbersome and perennially out
don't feed the troll?
The poster raises no concrete suggestions, and seems to focus on his own
ease, not the portability of his product. Seems to be just tossing crap
around, trolling for a response.
Some of us are defined by who we're fighting rather than what we're
building.
Allan
On Sun,
Stepan Kasal wrote:
Hello,
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 02:30:25PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Being deprecated is different that being removed, and as such it would
be good to have a reference to AC_FOREACH in the eventual documentation
of m4_foreach and others, with the info that AC_FOREACH
Keith Marshall wrote:
On Saturday 22 October 2005 10:08 am, Allan Clark wrote:
You might want to consider switching to elm, mutt, or a Mozilla-based
client (if you're a graphical guy); they have these features, and are
fairly well-tested.
I don't have any option to do this -- I am
Keith MARSHALL wrote:
Oops. Forgot that GNU's list mailers don't set the Reply-to header
properly, (can this not be fixed?), and only replied privately to
Stepan.
My mailer allows me to choose. I use reply when I want to make a
private reply, and reply-all when I want to reply to the list as
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
make:
cd tdg/en/html hhc index.hhp
/bin/sh: line 1: hhc: command not found
Why does AC_CHECK_PROG find hhc ?
Isn't Why doesn't 'make' find 'hhc'? a better question?
of course it's a good question.
But a goal of autoconf
Trevor Woerner wrote:
I have a project with source files in multiple subdirectories: src,
tests, cfg. Doxygen will generate code documentation based on special
hints in the comments of the code files themselves (like javadoc, if
you're familiar with that mechanism).
I could just blindly have
Yudai Yamagishi wrote:
Hi,
I have RedHat Linux 9.0 working as a server.
Recently I tried to install autoconf-2.59-80 using rpm but gave me
these errors.
file /usr/share/info/standards.info.gz from install of autoconf-2.59-
80 conflicts with file from package binutils-2.13.90.0.18-9
I need to
Hi cool_nithu;
$ ./configure --with mpiCC=yes --without-gcc
1) --with-, ie --with-mpiCC=yes (no space)
2) ./configure --help should tell you if that's even an option (if it's
not, ./configure ignores it)
Did these options come from that package? Did you get them from some
Paul Eggert wrote:
Sam Steingold [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
the reason I want a CPP macro and not a run-time if is that the code
will end up looking like this:
if (size_of(u.ut_tv.tv_sec) = 4)
a_function_expecting_32_bit_argument(u.ut_tv.tv_sec);
else
John W. Eaton wrote:
I'm using Autoconf 2.59:
devzero:450 autoconf --version
autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.59
Written by David J. MacKenzie and Akim Demaille.
Copyright (C) 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even
I regret if this is a recurring query; I didn't find in archives.
Is there a moderated form of this list? Has anyone established a
moderated list on his/her own server that feeds from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Allan
___
Autoconf mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Libtool-ers;
I think this issue simply becomes mired by stacking up on either side of
a for/against line.
Previously, it was mentioned that certain troublesome source trees be
used as litmus tests for automake or autoconf changes; the same may hold
true now for libtool. Brief summary: if you
Sebastian;
AC_CXX_CHECK_LIB (LIBRARY, DECLARATION-SECTION,CALL-SECTION,
[ACTION-IF-FOUND],[ACTION-IF-NOT-FOUND], [OTHER-LIBRARIES])
You've added a declaration section to my sample.
Is this a re-statement without further reinforcement or justification
that you want to have a #include
Patrick Guio wrote:
If I just touch configure then everything is running ok again. I am not
sure which of the package is generating this trouble nut is there any
policy/strategy of using configuration tool together with a cvs
repository?
A common timestamp issue is introduced when developers
Mark D. Roth wrote:
On Wed May 15 17:21 2002 -0700, Paul Eggert wrote:
I use Automake's aclocal for this. It generates aclocal.m4
automatically from m4/*.m4. In my case, the m4/*.m4 files are often
links to the canonical versions.
Unfortunately, that won't work for me, since I use
John;
I find that it's made for GCC, but seems to support (by checking) a
number of other build systems. For example, it detects and supports the
UnixWare, Open UNIX build systems, Open Server, and I think it also
works with the Intel icc tool.
In this do-it-yourself realm, I'm sure if you try
AutoConf;
This may be a Question from the FAQ -- I'd read it if I knew where it
was.
How do I make a AC_CHECK_LIB for a C++ library?
My example looks for cgi_base::configureForServer on different systems
like this:
AC_CHECK_LIB(cgi, configureForServer__8cgi_basePci)
AC_CHECK_LIB(cgi,
Pavel, et al;
The CVS HEAD release passes this test.
FYI
Allan
Pavel Roskin wrote:
The existing test in Autoconf will never pick up anything other than a
file because in actually scans $PATH. That's why the failure is only
observed on the systems with `fc' being a file in $PATH.
[...]
Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On May 29, 2000, Marek Kowal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have an .x file and want to create, using rpcgen, stub files in
automake. Later on I want to compile and link part of them into server,
and the other part into client. Did anybody excercised this already?
30 matches
Mail list logo
