В Mon, 23 Aug 2010 11:01:14 -0700, Paul Eggert написа:
On 08/23/10 10:28, John Calcote wrote:
What is the correct approach for this situation? Should I simply define
__USE_UNIX98 in my source code
No, because that symbol is private to glibc. I wouldn't mess with it.
Instead, use Autoconf's
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Let's use a specific example:
AC_INIT([Pkg], [1.0], [bug], [pkg], [website])
Do you think that 'autoconf-2.63 -Wall -Werror' should have errored out
for the website argument?
Of course it should not and it would not error out. 2.63 is history,
so there's no way a
Eric Blake wrote:
I have to wonder if there are cases where rejecting extra arguments
might not be advisable,
No, the behavior should remain the same (silently ignoring them); any
change smells like a dangerous path to follow. The only difference
would be the warnings (well, errors with
Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
A diligent distro package maintainer certainly reads the
Makefile.am, and also reviews the full diff between upstream
releases.
Very few packages do this,
I don't think that anyone can state with reasonable certainty how many
do or do not do this. I do it
Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
Such a comment is also more suitable in the README, since a packager
will not read the Makefile.am.
A diligent distro package maintainer certainly reads the Makefile.am,
and also reviews the full diff between upstream releases.
Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yavor Doganov ya...@gnu.org
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:18:20 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Fix AC_FUNC_MMAP regression from 2009-11-09.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
* lib/autoconf/functions.m4 (AC_FUNC_MMAP): Add
В Fri, 09 Oct 2009 16:34:38 +0800, 张亚霏 написа:
AM_CONDITIONAL([BUILD_PCRECPP],[test $build_pcrecpp=true])
Put spaces around `=' (also for the BUILD_LIBICONV conditional).
The test for pcrecpp has to be performed with a C++ compiler, otherwise
the conditional will always be false. (You can
В Fri, 22 Aug 2008 11:21:04 +0800, Tim Post написа:
The GPL requires only that you make the source code available with all
files needed to complete the build. So, in essence, you could exclude
the things needed to rebuild the build system, but you would alienate
anyone who is willing to help
В Thu, 06 Sep 2007 20:55:16 -0600, Bob Proulx написа:
I changed the headers so that replies remain in the autoconf list and
not over at the non-public www-discuss list. That looks to have been an
unintentional artifact of the way that message was forwarded.
OK. I replied to Eric privately
At Fri, 24 Aug 2007 14:51:40 -0600,
Eric Blake wrote at [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Does anyone know how the pig latin and sweedish chef translation
pages were generated, or should we delete those now that they are
out of date?
As a general rule, please don't remove translations only because
they're
10 matches
Mail list logo
