Re: [BUG] autoupdate vs aclocal m4_include

2006-04-07 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 10:10:31AM CEST: * Noah Misch wrote on Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 12:50:47AM CEST: On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 11:07:14PM +0200, Stepan Kasal wrote: * bin/autoupdate.in (handle_autoconf_patches): Change the way we distinguish m4sugar macros. I

Re: [BUG] autoupdate vs aclocal m4_include

2006-04-03 Thread Noah Misch
Hi Gary, On Fri, Nov 19, 2004 at 06:33:59AM +, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: This is Autoconf-2.59, Automake-1.9.2, CVS Libtool branch-2-0: Unless AC_CONFIG_MACRODIR is called aclocal or m4sugar, autoupdate complains about `unknown set' if aclocal.m4 uses m4_include. The run still works, but

Re: [BUG] autoupdate vs aclocal m4_include

2006-04-03 Thread Stepan Kasal
Hello, On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 12:23:11PM -0700, Noah Misch wrote: Note that naming a macro directory `m4sugar' causes autoupdate to misbehave, all we need is to distinguish the m4sugar macros. What about the following? Stepan 2006-04-03 Stepan Kasal [EMAIL PROTECTED] *

Re: [BUG] autoupdate vs aclocal m4_include

2006-04-03 Thread Noah Misch
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 11:07:14PM +0200, Stepan Kasal wrote: * bin/autoupdate.in (handle_autoconf_patches): Change the way we distinguish m4sugar macros. I think this is superior. Thanks. ___ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@gnu.org

[BUG] autoupdate vs aclocal m4_include

2004-11-18 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
This is Autoconf-2.59, Automake-1.9.2, CVS Libtool branch-2-0: Unless AC_CONFIG_MACRODIR is called aclocal or m4sugar, autoupdate complains about `unknown set' if aclocal.m4 uses m4_include. The run still works, but there are several pages of spurious warnings. Here's a minimal repeat recipe: $