"Alexandre" == Alexandre Oliva [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Alexandre On Jan 25, 2001, Akim Demaille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should we (i) make sure not to use config.site in the test suite,
or (ii) have this test grep out this message?
Alexandre (ii)
Since now the `loading config.site' is
| Hi,
Salut Nicolas!
| I just tried CVS autoconf on Tru64 unix v5.1 computer and noticed a
| failure of AC_CACHE_CHECK if an autoconf site file exists in default
| prefix location `/usr/local'. without this `config.site' defaults file
| all tests are successful.
|
| njoly@medusa [~] cat
Should we (i) make sure not to use config.site in the test suite, or
(ii) have this test grep out this message?
It sounds good to have the test suite protected from the user, but
OTOH, it sounds good to have a means to check configures using the end
user's config.site.
I'd vote for (ii) -
On Jan 25, 2001, Akim Demaille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should we (i) make sure not to use config.site in the test suite, or
(ii) have this test grep out this message?
(ii)
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer
Akim Demaille wrote:
Should we (i) make sure not to use config.site in the test suite, or
(ii) have this test grep out this message?
I vote for not using an installed config.site, because the test
suite should be self-contained and a config.site test within the
testsuite should be based on
