Re[9]: The problem with pgk-config

2010-08-02 Thread Konstantin Andreev
On 08/01/10 12:05, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: [...skip...] The one fly in the ointment is that a significant selection of libtool users seem to find life more convenient when they delete all installed .la files, which would make folding in pkg-config like functionality impossible. I confess that

Re: The problem with pgk-config

2010-08-01 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
[RESEND - apologies if you see this twice... no echo from the list after 10 hours or so] On 1 Aug 2010, at 04:31, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: On Sat, 31 Jul 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: I'd rather avoid (3), and I know (2) is going to be quite some work, but should be done. What things go wrong

Re: The problem with pgk-config

2010-08-01 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
On 1 Aug 2010, at 04:31, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: On Sat, 31 Jul 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: I'd rather avoid (3), and I know (2) is going to be quite some work, but should be done. What things go wrong with pkg-config? (Please adjust the Subject: when replying to this, thanks!) The main

The problem with pgk-config

2010-07-31 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: I'd rather avoid (3), and I know (2) is going to be quite some work, but should be done. What things go wrong with pkg-config? (Please adjust the Subject: when replying to this, thanks!) The main problem I find with pgk-config is that it has