Re: [PATCH] Support AC_CONFIG_LIBOBJ_DIR (fixes PR/401)

2005-04-25 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Salut Alexandre, Thanks for the feedback: Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote: * LIBOBJDIR seems worthy to document from the Autoconf user perspective. Non-automake might also benefit from this; and we should avoid using undocumented interfaces in Automake. Okay, I've added that to the attached

Re: [PATCH] Support AC_CONFIG_LIBOBJ_DIR (fixes PR/401)

2005-04-25 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
Hi Gary, Thanks for all the work. I'm only commenting on the Autoconf part, here. I'll complete the Automake part after this is one is in. Gary == Gary V Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] * Autoconf needs to be adjusted to reflect the fact that Automake scans a new macro. See the

Re: [PATCH] Support AC_CONFIG_LIBOBJ_DIR (fixes PR/401)

2005-04-21 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
Some quick comments. I'm in a hurry. And before I forget: thanks for working on this. * LIBOBJDIR seems worthy to document from the Autoconf user perspective. Non-automake might also benefit from this; and we should avoid using undocumented interfaces in Automake. * The Automake manual